What he means is that my brothers are finding it hard to hunt him down. Why exactly do you need to know his real identity? Ibn Khaldun Bharati writes on one of the most sensitive fault lines in Indian public life. Revealing his identity could mean professional consequences, social ostracisation, threats, harassment, or worse. A pseudonym is not automatically an escape from accountability. His arguments are right there in public. Read them. Challenge them. Tear them apart line by line if they are wrong. But why must the man behind them be exposed? What does his Aadhaar name add to the intellectual argument? Nothing. What it does add is a target. Once his identity is known, people can find his employer, family, neighbourhood, community and personal history. Suddenly the debate is no longer about what he wrote. It becomes about who he is and what pressure can be brought upon him. That is precisely why pseudonyms have existed in political writing for centuries. Demand accountability for ideas, yes. Demanding that a pseudonymous writer reveal himself despite foreseeable personal risk starts looking less like accountability and more like an invitation to doxxing. If his argument is bad, defeat the argument. Why do you need the address of the man making it?