Poverty is a decision. Ownership is the cure. Conviction is the necessity. Pain is the catalyst. Asymmetry is its mathematic shape.
Joined August 2020
- Tweets47.7K
- Following1.6K
- Followers30.2K
- Likes59.9K
Pinned Tweet
$QNT gets lumped in with every other interoperability token.
I think that's a mistake, and the reason goes back to how the internet itself was designed.
Quant has been designed to be "Internet-Scale".
But what does that mean?
I come bearing gifts. 🎁
With the latest deals signed and Fusion set to open to retail, a lot of new people are about to look at $QNT. The information they need on how the token actually works is scattered across old Telegram messages, AMAs and Quant’s website, and some of it, like the early papers on token utility, isn’t on the website at all. Quant has also retired its Telegram comms, so asking every newcomer to dig through chat history isn’t realistic.
So I’ve put it all in one place, with sources for claims: quamfylounge.com
The Quant x The Clearing House hints have been there since the beginning.
ethereum:0x4a220e6096b25eadb88358cb44068a3248254675
Get ten random people off the street and start a company together with equal vote and power between them.
The company is doomed from day one.
That’s democracy spending half your life’s work.
Pretending to solve anything, lie to your face and blaming you for everything.
Dutch Alchemist retweeted
I’ve had a feeling for a while that $QNT has quietly outperformed its whole generation, so I tried to check it properly.
The group is every token that started trading in 2018. I went by first trading date rather than ICO date because I wanted projects that went through the same market and cycle phases: all of them listed into the 2018 crash and had to survive a full bear market before the 2021 run.
Each project is measured from $0 to today’s market cap. I didn’t use ICO prices, because presale discounts and bonus rounds make them unreliable, or multiples “from the bottom”, which depend completely on which day you choose.
Market cap on its own flatters tokens that still have a lot of supply locked up, so each one is discounted by its float: market cap × circulating supply ÷ max supply. A project with half its tokens still to come gets credit for half its market cap. $QNT has a fixed supply of 14.6M that has been fully unlocked since 2019, so it takes no discount. Cronos does, which is why it drops from first on raw market cap to third here.
1000+ dead 2018 projects aren’t on the chart for obvious reasons.
What makes this more interesting to me is that $QNT got here before its main product is live.
@FusionLayer25 , hasn’t gone beyond initial mainnet tests with institutions, so the staking and transaction volume it’s built for hasn’t started yet. It has signed clients that settle trillions a day.
Every other project in this chart is valued on what it already does.
I’ve had a feeling for a while that $QNT has quietly outperformed its whole generation, so I tried to check it properly.
The group is every token that started trading in 2018. I went by first trading date rather than ICO date because I wanted projects that went through the same market and cycle phases: all of them listed into the 2018 crash and had to survive a full bear market before the 2021 run.
Each project is measured from $0 to today’s market cap. I didn’t use ICO prices, because presale discounts and bonus rounds make them unreliable, or multiples “from the bottom”, which depend completely on which day you choose.
Market cap on its own flatters tokens that still have a lot of supply locked up, so each one is discounted by its float: market cap × circulating supply ÷ max supply. A project with half its tokens still to come gets credit for half its market cap. $QNT has a fixed supply of 14.6M that has been fully unlocked since 2019, so it takes no discount. Cronos does, which is why it drops from first on raw market cap to third here.
1000+ dead 2018 projects aren’t on the chart for obvious reasons.
What makes this more interesting to me is that $QNT got here before its main product is live.
@FusionLayer25 , hasn’t gone beyond initial mainnet tests with institutions, so the staking and transaction volume it’s built for hasn’t started yet. It has signed clients that settle trillions a day.
Every other project in this chart is valued on what it already does.
Dutch Alchemist retweeted
They are literally admitting the great replacement is real but blaming it on russia😭
🇪🇺🇷🇺 Ursula von der Leyen says RUSSIA IS USING MASS MIGRATION as a weapon against EUROPE
The EU chief accuses Russia of deliberately pushing migrants toward European borders to overwhelm authorities, spread fear and divide the continent.
She now wants new emergency powers to deal with these situations.
Brussels has SPENT YEARS defending migration and asylum as part of Europe's values.
Now it's warning that hostile governments can exploit those same systems to destabilize Europe.
Completely ridiculous. And pretty revealing who is actually behind it all...
Writer: Oliver
The CoinMarketCap list shows you that the assets go up a lot more when there's retail txs happening on its platform.
It makes the tokens more tangible in utility.
$QNT has yet to open up @FusionLayer25 to retail.
Staking, multichain apps that feel like one chain, Any to Any DEX.
Even assets that don't have smart contracts on their network.
None of it requires synthetic wrapped token versions.
Using multiple chains without manually getting gas tokens for each.
No fragmented liquidity or high slippage.
No USDC across tens of chains, just one balance spendable anywhere. Unified Tokens. (uToken)
Oracles linking order books across chains is aggregation, not unification. It’s a meta-search engine pretending to be a single market.
Fusion links uTokens to institutional levels of liquidity into a single settlement environment.
There's no place else I'd park my capital right now.
NFA.
Dutch Alchemist retweeted
We made the first AI model you can have a realistic conversation with that was trained entirely on speech!
Dessa is a full-duplex speech-to-speech model that you can run on consumer GPUs.
This is a GPT3 moment for speech.
Dutch Alchemist retweeted
The @USOCC has published its final rules for implementing the #GENIUSAct. It sets out requirements for stablecoin issuers under its supervision, along with rules for custody activities at OCC-supervised banks.
For US banks, this establishes a clear framework for one form of regulated #digitalmoney. Many will now be weighing #stablecoins, #tokeniseddeposits, or both.
Whichever route they take, the same questions follow: how these assets connect to existing systems, how they move between institutions, and how #payments can be programmed and settled synchronously.
That's where Quant steps in; creating corridors for the world's digital money.
Read the full release here: occ.gov/news-issuances/news-…
The rule and the Act will take effect on 18 January 2027. The OCC will confirm separately when it opens applications, and rules on AML and sanctions will follow in a separate rulemaking with the US Treasury.
Dutch Alchemist retweeted
The infrastructure problem holding regulated finance back from #blockchain now has an answer.
Public L1s lack the controls institutions need.
Private permissioned networks solved that, but created silos.
Fusion sits above both, connecting existing ledgers without bridges, without wrapped tokens, without new points of failure. Every asset class. Every network. Under institutional control.
Read more: quant.network/perspectives/b…
#QuantFusion #TokenisedFinance #Interoperability
And here’s the concerning part according to Schwab
When will we hear the team’s updated plan for the $LINK token?
Instead of asking yourself: "is it going lower?"
Ask yourself: "When would I actually buy back in again if I sell now?"
You would still feel bearish while the asset's price climbs over your sell price.
Success is a bunch of stored competence camouflaged as nothingness and sudden explosion, exponentially wave after wave.
Nobody reaches their goal gradually.