
Community Executive @E8Markets | Futures Traderš½| Former Support Lead @Myforexfunds
Joined December 2024
- Tweets5.4K
- Following273
- Followers1.3K
- Likes5.8K
Pinned Tweet
I find it quite funny and interesting that this is on my 2018ā2019 charts, kinda messy.
The beginning is always an important turning point and a key moment for every trader.
Angel retweeted
The first time you take a loss and donāt try to make it back immediately on the next trade,
nobody will know.
Theres no screenshot for it.
No PnL to post.
You just close the laptop and go on with your day.
This is a very special day.
That was the day you became one step closer to being a real trader.
One step closer to making your dream a reality.
Remember those moments, and keep that momentum going.
In the long run you build up more moments like these, till suddenly you no longer have any bad habits holding you back.
Your taking good setups avoiding the bad ones in between.
You're now a professional.
Angel retweeted
The removal of a consistency rule should be earned.
At E8 Markets, we believe traders should have a clear path to earn payouts while proving their edge. Once they demonstrate repeatable skill, they earn greater freedom.
That protects the business while rewarding the traders it was built for.
One big winning day can be luck. Greater freedom should follow evidence of skill.
Angel retweeted
A trader can spend 5 years developing their craft and still have almost nothing to show for it beyond a P&L screenshot.
No verified track record. No portable reputation. No professional identity.
In almost every other competitive profession, your achievements compound.
Why should trading be any different?
Angel retweeted
Another week. Another E8 One takeoverš
From October 19ā23, every spot in our Top 5 payouts came from E8 One with $20,000 at the top.
Different traders.
Different account sizes.
Same product showing up again.
At this point, are we even surprised anymore?
Whoās taking a spot next week? š
Angel retweeted
SAUDI ARABIA IS SENDING ITS DEFENCE MINISTER TO IRAN TODAY.
AT THE SAME TIME, IRAN-ALIGNED HOUTHIS CLAIM THEY'VE ATTACKED SAUDI ARABIA'S OIL PIPELINE.
And oil prices are actually FALLING this morning.
I think there's a serious risk that financial markets are underestimating how complicated this situation has become.
Look at what's happened over the past 48 hours.
Sunday: Saudi Arabia's stock market falls 2.7%. Its worst session in 18 months.
Monday morning: Saudi stocks rebound 2.5%.
Brent crude, which closed Friday at $116.72, has pulled back towards $115.
US inflation remains at 3.7%.
US 10-year Treasury yields are around 4.97%.
And Donald Trump has just EIGHT DAYS until the US midterm elections.
Now consider the latest developments.
Reuters is reporting that senior officials from Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan are meeting Iranian officials in Tehran today.
Saudi Arabia is sending its DEFENCE MINISTER.
Pakistan is sending its army chief.
Turkey is sending its intelligence chief.
These aren't minor diplomatic representatives.
They're senior officials responsible for national security.
And their countries signed a joint defence agreement in August under which an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all.
Meanwhile, the Houthis are claiming further attacks against Saudi Arabia, including pumping stations along its East-West oil pipeline.
Saudi Arabia hasn't confirmed those particular strikes.
But the choice of target is significant.
That 1,200-kilometre pipeline carries Saudi crude across the country towards the Red Sea.
It's one of the most important routes Saudi Arabia has for getting oil to international markets while the Strait of Hormuz remains severely disrupted.
Earlier this year, Saudi Arabia restored the pipeline's pumping capacity to approximately SEVEN MILLION BARRELS PER DAY.
Think about the implications if that infrastructure suffers a serious, prolonged disruption.
The Strait of Hormuz has already become a major problem for global energy supplies.
The alternative route through Saudi Arabia would then face additional pressure.
And suddenly the market isn't just worrying about getting oil through one shipping chokepoint.
It's worrying about the infrastructure being used to get AROUND it.
That's an entirely different level of supply risk.
Yet Brent is falling this morning.
Why?
Because Qatar has been mediating, and Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan are now engaging directly with Tehran.
Investors are assigning greater probability to some form of diplomatic progress.
Fair enough.
But an agreement hasn't been reached.
And we've already seen how quickly previous diplomatic progress can unravel.
Remember the interim agreement in June?
It didn't produce a lasting settlement.
Now we're approaching another potentially important political deadline.
November the 3rd.
Trump has eight days until Americans head to the polls.
Iran understands the pressure he's facing from elevated energy prices, inflation and the economic consequences of prolonged conflict.
Reuters has previously reported that Iranian officials see delaying negotiations as a way of increasing that political pressure.
But Washington also has military options under consideration.
And both sides have indicated they're prepared for further confrontation if negotiations fail.
I wouldn't assume that a meeting in Tehran suddenly removes those risks.
Especially when attacks involving Saudi infrastructure are continuing.
The economic implications are already considerable.
Brent remains around $115 despite this morning's pullback.
US inflation is running at 3.7%.
And the Federal Reserve announces its latest interest-rate decision on WEDNESDAY.
That's just six days before the midterms.
Imagine being a Federal Reserve policymaker right now.
Inflation is still well above target.
Energy prices remain elevated.
The risk of further supply disruption hasn't disappeared.
Yet US Treasury yields have fallen sharply from the highs we saw earlier this month.
The 10-year was above 5.3%.
This morning it's around 4.97%.
That's a substantial move.
And it reflects a market having to weigh persistent inflation against concerns about economic growth and financial conditions.
If oil starts climbing again and Treasury yields follow, renewed inflation fears could be driving the next move.
That could provide support for the dollar and create further pressure on equities.
But if oil rises while yields continue falling, I'd be looking much more closely at whether investors are becoming concerned about the economic damage.
High energy costs.
Restrictive interest rates.
Pressure on household spending.
And a technology sector already facing questions about the enormous sums being invested in artificial intelligence.
Microsoft, Alphabet and Amazon all report earnings this week.
The Fed meets Wednesday.
US GDP and PCE inflation arrive Thursday.
And the Bank of Japan and ECB have decisions of their own.
This is an extraordinary amount of economic information for investors to digest while the geopolitical situation remains so uncertain.
I've spent 18 years following these markets, and I've learnt not to confuse an initial reaction to a headline with a lasting change in the underlying economic picture.
Oil falling on diplomatic optimism is understandable.
Saudi equities recovering on the prospect of negotiations is understandable.
But neither development proves the risks to global energy supplies have been resolved.
A credible agreement could remove a substantial amount of the geopolitical premium from oil.
That would be welcome news for inflation.
But another significant disruption to Saudi export infrastructure could send the market in precisely the opposite direction.
And with eight days until the US midterms, I wouldn't rule out sharp changes in expectations over the coming sessions.
I'm watching Brent crude, Treasury yields and the dollar together.
The relationship between those three markets could tell us considerably more about investor concerns than any single political headline.
My concern is that investors may be too quick to price diplomatic success before the underlying security problems have actually been resolved.
Saudi Arabia's defence minister is heading to Tehran.
The Houthis are claiming attacks on Saudi oil infrastructure.
Oil is falling.
And Trump is running out of time before the midterms.
I want to hear what everyone thinks.
DO WE GET A GENUINE BREAKTHROUGH WITH IRAN BEFORE NOVEMBER 3RD?
Or are markets getting far too comfortable with another round of peace talks?
Angel retweeted
SAUDI STOCKS JUST HAD THEIR WORST DAY IN 18 MONTHS.
And Wall Street hasn't even opened yet.
Saudi Arabia's stock market fell 2.7% on Sunday.
Egypt's fell 3.6%.
Brent crude closed Friday at $116.72 a barrel.
I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss what's happening in the Middle East as another temporary geopolitical scare.
We've got quite a week ahead.
Wednesday: Federal Reserve interest-rate decision.
3 November: US midterm elections.
Donald Trump has just NINE DAYS until Americans head to the polls.
And there's still no lasting agreement with Iran.
The timing of all this is becoming a serious problem.
Oil has risen more than 6% over the past week. US inflation is already running at 3.7%, and the Fed now has to make another interest-rate decision with energy prices elevated and geopolitical uncertainty showing little sign of disappearing.
That's a particularly uncomfortable position for any central bank.
Higher energy costs feed into transport, production and ultimately consumer prices.
Businesses either absorb those costs through lower margins or pass them on.
Households are already dealing with elevated borrowing costs.
And the longer this drags on, the greater the potential damage to economic activity.
What concerns me is how much of this is now overlapping.
You've got the Middle East conflict, another potential inflation shock, nervousness surrounding technology valuations and a US president heading into an election under considerable political pressure.
Iran knows the pressure Washington is under.
Reuters has already reported that Iranian officials see prolonging negotiations as a way of increasing that pressure ahead of the midterms.
Trump, meanwhile, has been openly discussing the possibility of further military action.
And while everyone's debating whether he's bluffing, the economic consequences are already being felt.
Look at the bond market.
Earlier this month, the US 10-year Treasury yield surged above 5.3%.
Investors were concerned about inflation and the possibility of interest rates remaining higher for longer.
Then we saw a sharp reversal.
Money flowed back into government bonds.
Yields fell.
By Friday, the 10-year was around 4.99%.
Meanwhile, oil has continued climbing.
I find that particularly telling.
We're seeing investors grapple with two problems that can pull financial markets in completely different directions.
The first is inflation.
If oil keeps rising and inflation expectations follow, the Fed may have less room to ease monetary policy.
That could put upward pressure on Treasury yields, support the dollar and create additional difficulties for equities.
The second is economic growth.
Because if energy prices remain elevated while borrowing costs stay restrictive, eventually something has to give.
Consumer spending weakens. Corporate margins come under pressure. Investment slows.
And if investors become sufficiently concerned about the economic outlook, they may continue buying government bonds even with inflation running above target.
That pushes yields LOWER.
Think about what that means for the Nasdaq, gold and the dollar.
The same geopolitical escalation could produce very different market reactions depending on whether investors are more concerned about inflation or the damage being done to economic growth.
You can have a perfectly reasonable view on oil and still get the dollar completely wrong if you misunderstand what's driving Treasury yields.
Now consider the political situation.
Trump wants lower energy prices heading into the midterms.
Iran has little incentive to hand Washington an easy political victory without securing meaningful concessions.
And both sides are operating in an environment where a miscalculation could become extraordinarily expensive.
Saudi equities have already taken a considerable hit.
Wall Street gets its chance to respond on Monday.
I'm particularly interested in whether US Treasury yields continue falling if oil pushes higher again.
Because if that happens, I'd be questioning just how worried investors are becoming about the broader economy.
And we've still got Wednesday's Fed decision to get through.
My concern isn't simply another spike in oil prices.
It's the possibility that investors begin losing confidence in the economy's ability to withstand expensive energy, elevated interest rates and prolonged geopolitical uncertainty all at once.
That could create a very difficult environment for risk assets heading into November.
I certainly wouldn't be assuming every dip in equities is automatically a buying opportunity here.
There's a lot for markets to digest over the coming days.
And with only nine days until the midterms, the political pressure isn't going anywhere.
I'm curious where everyone stands on this.
Do you think Wall Street shrugs off the Middle East escalation when trading resumes?
Or are we approaching a much bigger correction in US equities?
Angel retweeted
New episode with @Albertburgess_ just dropped.
He got real about leaving a job he hated while £40k in debt with two kids at home, and still figuring trading out at the same time.
Five years later heās still here, still trading, and still talking about the parts most people skip.
youtu.be/Bh5WcAS6XZw
Angel retweeted
Yeah⦠weāre taking the discount away today!!
30% OFF E8 One Forex.
Pass it. Get your payout approved. Earn the same challenge again FREE.
Code E8ARC expires today.
Donāt be in the replies tomorrow asking us to bring it backšš
Say what you want about ICT, but from a marketing standpoint, he is in a league of his own.
The way he built his personal brand, created exclusivity, and turned his concepts into an entire culture needs to be studied.
Love him or hate him, thatās a masterclass in branding
Angel retweeted
Initial Balance has been one of the go-to stats in index trading for years, and it shows up constantly in our live sessions.
But everyone reads the market a little differently.
Whatās your āI need this on my chartā tool or stat? š
Angel retweeted
I remember peak twitter 2022-2023 before all the prop firm drama and affiliate shilling moved in
Those were the days
Just education
Traders helping and motivating
Angel retweeted
TRUMP HAS 10 DAYS UNTIL THE US MIDTERMS.
AND YESTERDAY HE OPENLY RAISED THE POSSIBILITY OF ANOTHER US MILITARY OPERATION AGAINST IRAN.
Oil has just closed at $116.72 a barrel.
I think we're heading into an INCREDIBLY important week for financial markets.
And there's something developing here that concerns me.
Look at where we finished on Friday.
Brent crude: $116.72.
WTI crude: $103.27.
US inflation: 3.7%.
US 10-year Treasury yield: 4.99%.
The Dow Jones fell 653 points.
And next week, the Federal Reserve meets to decide what happens with US interest rates.
All of this is happening just DAYS before Americans head to the polls.
Now, look at what Donald Trump said on Friday.
"We may do another little Epic Fury."
That's the name associated with the US military operation against Iran.
He's now openly discussing the possibility of further military action.
Meanwhile, Reuters is reporting that Iranian officials have developed plans to target UNDERSEA COMMUNICATIONS CABLES in the Gulf if the US and Israel launch renewed strikes.
These are reported contingency plans, not attacks that have taken place.
But the implications are worth understanding.
We're no longer looking exclusively at the risk of disrupted oil supplies.
We're now hearing threats involving communications infrastructure, data centres and other assets that modern economies depend on.
And there's a reason I find that particularly interesting.
Look at the US technology sector.
For months, investors have been pouring extraordinary amounts of capital into artificial intelligence.
Data centres. Semiconductors. Cloud infrastructure.
Billions upon billions of dollars.
And now investors are starting to ask some uncomfortable questions about the cost of all this investment and the returns these companies can actually deliver.
At the SAME time, oil prices are rising again.
Which brings us back to inflation.
US inflation is already running at 3.7%.
Higher energy costs, if sustained, put further pressure on businesses and consumers.
And if those pressures start feeding into wider inflation expectations, the Federal Reserve could find itself in an extremely uncomfortable position.
Because next Wednesday, 28 October, the Fed announces its latest interest-rate decision.
That's just SIX days before the midterms.
Now, here's where I think this gets particularly interesting for traders.
Remember what we witnessed with US Treasury yields?
The 10-year surged above 5.3% earlier this month.
Then investors started buying government bonds.
Yields fell sharply.
On Friday, the 10-year recovered slightly to 4.99%.
But we're still well below those earlier highs.
And this is happening while oil is becoming MORE expensive.
That tells me investors are weighing something far bigger than the latest inflation print.
The possibility that high borrowing costs, expensive energy and pressure on highly valued equities could begin doing real damage to the economy.
Consider the position the Fed is in.
If inflation expectations climb again, maintaining restrictive monetary policy becomes harder to avoid.
But if financial conditions deteriorate and growth weakens, keeping rates elevated carries its own risks.
And the market has to price BOTH possibilities.
This is particularly important for anyone trading the Nasdaq, gold or the US dollar.
If oil continues rising and Treasury yields climb with it, inflation concerns may be regaining control.
That could support the dollar and put further pressure on equities.
But if oil surges while Treasury yields FALL?
Investors may be telling us they're becoming more concerned about economic damage than inflation itself.
And in that environment, the reaction across currencies, bonds and gold can look very different.
I've spent 18 years watching these relationships develop, and one thing I'm paying particular attention to is how quickly the market's priorities can change.
Two weeks ago, investors were obsessing over inflation and rising yields.
Now they're questioning the sustainability of AI spending, buying government bonds and watching another energy shock unfold.
And we're approaching two enormously important dates.
28 OCTOBER: FEDERAL RESERVE.
3 NOVEMBER: US MIDTERM ELECTIONS.
Iran knows the political pressure Washington is under.
Reuters has already reported that Iranian officials see prolonging negotiations as a way of increasing that pressure.
But here's what I'm particularly concerned about.
What happens if we reach November the 3rd without a meaningful diplomatic breakthrough?
Trump has said the US won't launch fresh strikes before the elections.
Yet he's now openly discussing another military operation.
And Iranian officials are warning of a much wider response if attacks resume.
That introduces considerable uncertainty into what happens AFTER the election.
Now, I'm not suggesting further strikes are inevitable.
But financial markets don't need an event to happen before they start repricing the possibility of it.
And that brings me to my biggest thought.
THE BIGGEST MARKET RISK NEXT WEEK MAY NOT BE THE FED'S INTEREST-RATE DECISION ITSELF.
IT MAY BE HOW INVESTORS REPRICE INFLATION, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GEOPOLITICAL RISK ALL AT ONCE.
Wall Street is closed for the weekend.
The geopolitical developments won't necessarily stop.
And when markets reopen, I'll be paying very close attention to what oil, Treasury yields and the dollar are telling us.
Because I don't think this is simply another temporary bout of geopolitical volatility.
I think we're approaching a point where the market will have to decide which risk concerns it MORE.
INFLATION STAYING HIGH.
OR THE ECONOMIC DAMAGE REQUIRED TO BRING IT DOWN.
And that decision could shape some of the biggest moves heading into the end of 2026.
Bookmark this.
We'll revisit it after the Fed and again after November the 3rd.
But I'm interested in something.
Do you think Trump reaches a deal with Iran before the midterms, or does the risk of another military escalation become GREATER once the election is over?










