Pinned Tweet
Thanks for advertising. Validation / assessment of generalizability are tough topics, see also @f2harrell 's book and ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2598…
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Very proud of my colleagues @MedicaInSpe and @CarlMoons and their consortia in obtaining two huge grants to bring AI forward in the medical area
nwo.nl/en/news/four-consorti…
Ewout Steyerberg retweeted
It has been claimed that there is no such thing as a validated prediction model. We provide empirical evidence for that claim in our new paper here
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…
with ao @Esteyerberg @DavidKlaveren see also @MaartenvSmeden @BenVanCalster @laure_wynants
Good to see @MaartenvSmeden talking on machine learning at the @stratosinit meeting in Leiden
Applications welcome, looking for two PhD candidates from outside of 🇳🇱
project 1: multidimensional statistical disease modeling of traumatic brain injury; project 2: acute stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage.
kuleuven.be/soprani/network
lumc.nl/en/about-lumc/werken… – at Leyden, The Netherlands
Ewout Steyerberg retweeted
Applications welcome, looking for two PhD candidates from outside of 🇳🇱
project 1: multidimensional statistical disease modeling of traumatic brain injury; project 2: acute stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage.
kuleuven.be/soprani/network
lumc.nl/en/about-lumc/werken… – at Leyden, The Netherlands
Ewout Steyerberg retweeted
New OA paper with Lu Tian and @robtibshirani. We show how to use the thousands of trials from the Cochrane database to improve the statistical inference for any given trial. We may expect gains that are roughly equivalent to doubling the sample size!
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…
Proud of @IRetelHelmrich defending her thesis on methods and applications of prognosis research. Great collaboration with @hesterlingsma, @DavidKlaveren, @CenterTBI
Great start of #weon2023 by @trishgreenhalgh talking about uncertainty and trustworthiness of #MachineLearning based tools for medical practice, moving on from Evidence-Based Medicine
Good to see the philosophical background to uncertainty highlighted. For decision making, Peirce wrote a brilliant 2 column Science paper in 1884, including Youden index and Net Benefit
science.org/doi/10.1126/scie…
Ewout Steyerberg retweeted
Should you use confidence intervals and p-values for net benefit and decision curve analysis? (now with correct link!) diagnprognres.biomedcentral.…
Ewout Steyerberg retweeted
We sometimes communicate risk as “we expect that out of 100 patients like you 5 will get disease X, but how do we communicate uncertainty?what if we said we base this prediction in the model on34 patients like you” #ESMDM23
Good start of Biennial European Conference | Society for Medical Decision Making smdm.org/meeting/18th-bienni…
Humans poor at understanding randomness @Gaissmaier
Ewout Steyerberg retweeted
"The generalizability of [clinical predictive] algorithms often goes untested, leaving the community in the dark on their accuracy & safety when applied to a specific medical setting." This commentary aims to provide clarity on generalizability objectives.
nature.com/articles/s41746-0…
Ewout Steyerberg retweeted
Don't miss the third @coremdproject free webinar on Objective Performance Criteria on Monday 3rd April 2023 from 17.00 until 18.15 CET.
Register here: bit.ly/core-md3
Polemic title, sensible content?@bds_lumc – at Leyden, The Netherlands
NEW PAPER
Title says it all: there is no such thing as a validated prediction model
doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-0…
Ewout Steyerberg retweeted
Proud of my humble friend (he would probably not announce this himself) and collaborator @BenVanCalster for becoming an Editor in Chief for the prestigious Statistics in Medicine journal
Great start of symposium in honor of @hesterlingsma her inaugural lecture by @Tufts_PACE on heterogeneity of treatment effect from a simple country doctor's perspective 😂@ErasmusMCPH
Ewout Steyerberg retweeted
Additive hazards model: ever wondered what to do about negative hazards and why the default method is ordinary least squares and not maximum likelihood? Then this will be of interest! @bds_lumc
Maximum likelihood estimation in the additive hazards model onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…




























