BOOM 💥 Stephen Miller's America First Legal has won its lawsuit against Katie Hobbs Only American citizens can vote in all (15) counties in Arizona...this is what pushback looks like Can I get a Hell yeah for Stephen Miller 👍

100th EPISODE! ELECTION INTEGRITY SPECIAL | Going Rogue with Lara Logan For our milestone 100th episode of Going Rogue with Lara Logan, we went LIVE before a studio audience at the America First Warehouse in Long Island, New York, for a special investigation into one of the most consequential issues facing America ahead of the 2026 midterms. From Venezuela to America’s voting systems, Lara and an extraordinary panel of intelligence experts, investigators, and election integrity advocates examine election manipulation, the vulnerabilities in our voting infrastructure, and the national security implications. Featuring Gary Berntsen, Ralph Pezzullo, Martin Rodil, Mark Cook, Dr. Andrew Paquette, Ed Solomon, Joe Hoft, and Tina Peters. 00:00:00 Opening clips and introduction of the Going Rogue 100th episode live event 00:01:13 Lara Logan introduces panelists Gary Berntsen, Martin Rodil, and Ralph Pezzullo 00:06:32 Origins of voting machine concerns: HAVA, Venezuela, and Smartmatic 00:15:19 Smartmatic ownership shuffling and the 2025 Liberty Vote sale 00:17:18 Recruiting software engineers abroad and building a lab in the Bahamas and Switzerland 00:23:00 Violence against a witness's family and cartel involvement 00:28:09 Tina Peters' forensic images and source code obtained 00:30:37 U.S. intelligence and law enforcement penetration and inaction 00:39:12 USAID, CEPPS, and funding foreign use of Smartmatic technology 00:43:00 Machines are compromised without internet connection 00:44:45 FBI scrutiny of the panelists and hybrid warfare against the U.S. 00:49:35 intelligence community, media, and what citizens can do 00:55:50 Cartel de los Soles and Tren de Aragua 01:00:07 China's role, fentanyl, and unrestricted warfare 01:02:25 Panel calls to action and discussion of leadership and Venezuela policy 01:14:34 Second panel introduced: Mark Cook, Andrew Paquette, Ed Solomon, Joseph Hoft 01:17:24 Mark Cook outlines two requirements for fair elections and the stages of manipulation 01:26:41 Andrew Paquette on duplicate and "clone" voter registrations and the "spiral algorithm" 01:38:46 Ed Solomon presents cast vote record analysis and "synchronized rates of change" 01:51:48 Joseph Hoft on auditing standards, California voter rolls, and sampling in Orange County 01:58:34 Panelists' practical advice: vote in person on Election Day, hand counts, and reporting 02:06:46 Closing thoughts and case references from Paquette and Solomon 02:23:00 Introduction of Tina Peters 02:30:00 Peters on prison, her conviction, and her plan to petition the U.S. Supreme Court 02:44:00 Peters on White House meetings, hand-count plans, and reform proposals 03:00:00 Audience Q&A: spreading the word and collecting cast vote records 03:07:00 Discussion of a "clean slate," the administrative state, and subversion 03:14:00 Connecticut lawsuit and the role of cast vote records 03:21:00 How Trump won in 2016 and shifts in tactics since 03:36:00 Audience tributes and a question on journalism careers 03:49:00 Closing remarks, a gift to Logan, and final calls to action @americafirstwh @RalphPezzullo @KingSolomon006 @realtinapeters @PatriotMarkCook @realJoeHoft @GaryBerntsen @GoingRoguewLara

🚨🚨 THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK / THE DEMOCRACY FILES: A PRIMER 🚨 I will be using this thread to track all drops, so bookmark it. I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on 𝕏 - feel free to distribute. Here's the primer: USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG. Officially, DRG administered "democracy assistance." They'd go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building. You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID's democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more. Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn't stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself. This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the "4 B's" framework. Block - use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong - control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening. In their own words: "We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment." - Danielle Reiff, DRG lead. Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself. DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a "huge galaxy": lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members. Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth's project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country's populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins. The UDA is very "hush-hush." They have no website, no roster, no filings. Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff. In the words of Reiff/DRG: "So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone's already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan." Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress." Running the UDA's Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They're turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond. The NSL4A's lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it's them, on tape. Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they're saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries' governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after. Who decides when your government is legitimate?