Ethan Porter (@EthanVPorter) profile picture

Associate professor at @GWtweets, @SMPAGWU, @GWIDDP, formerly @demjournal, @uchicago.

Washington, DC
Joined September 2009
Photo by Ethan Porter (@EthanVPorter)Photo by Ethan Porter (@EthanVPorter)Photo by Ethan Porter (@EthanVPorter)Photo by Ethan Porter (@EthanVPorter)Photo by Ethan Porter (@EthanVPorter)Photo by Ethan Porter (@EthanVPorter)Photo by Ethan Porter (@EthanVPorter)Photo by Ethan Porter (@EthanVPorter)Photo by Ethan Porter (@EthanVPorter)Photo by Ethan Porter (@EthanVPorter)
Fact-checks improve accuracy. But can they penalize spreaders of misinfo? At @PolBehavior, @jacobausubel, @nnikdav and I show that the answer is yes-sometimes. Unknown misinfo producers can be penalized, but well-known figures get off. Link: link.springer.com/article/10…
1
2
7
495
Ethan Porter retweeted
Some personal news: Yesterday was my last day at Microsoft. Today, I started a brand new job at the FAA and things are going pretty well!
1,685
13,260
889
229,594
3,753,655
Ethan Porter retweeted
19
1,078
31
8,302
265,011
Ethan Porter retweeted
Damn. Good on him!
Mississippi Republican Party Chair @MikeHurstMS on whether he would accept a win by Sen. candidate Scott Colom (D): "There is no election-denying going on here. If the laws are followed and the voters spoke, that is it and Mississippi Republicans will accept that."
11
22
1
819
197,771
Ethan Porter retweeted
watching mississippi count the remaining ballots
28
414
57
3,868
126,933
Ethan Porter retweeted
Replying to @pitchfork
@pitchforkmedia Looking forward to your writeup of the new @imaginedragons album
157
1,440
1,180
5,659
Ethan Porter retweeted
Such arguments—positing an existential crisis to which all other considerations must be subordinated—are as old as the American constitutional order. George Washington recognized their danger, and in his Farewell Address warned against "ill-founded jealousies and false alarms."
The single, overriding question of our politics is whether Democrats will shatter our constitutional order in 2029-30. All other questions are secondary.
1
6
1
37
2,712
Fascinated at the idea that Gelman has to be encouraged by external forces to write a "take down piece" on bad statistical inference. He does it for free, every day, for pure love of the game.
Meta had an internal PR plan to try and discredit Jon Haidt because he was a critic of social media. Meta was going to recruit academics, like Andrew Gelman, to write take down pieces. They were trying to turn academics against one another through a "whisper strategy". This is a very serious problem for open academic debate. If academics who share negative evidence about a platform are targeted by campaigns to smear our credibility, we are in deep, deep trouble. This creates a very serious conflict of interest for anyone who is paid to do this. law360.com/articles/2542517/…
7
30
4
331
18,316
Out of touch liberal elites don’t understand that for the average American the Cheesecake Factory is the nicest place they can imagine. For these people, sweatpants are like tuxedos. They think of Tweety Bird as a kind of God. Don’t you dare condescend to them.
119
234
38
4,212
99,957
The #stanfordprisonexperiment is now a reality show on Netflix--but there is a lot of a debate about what really happened in the original study. For nearly a half century it has been understood to show that assigning people to a toxic role will, on its own, unlock the human capacity to treat others with cruelty. But when we examined material in the Stanford archives, we found compellingthe evidence that, rather than guards conforming to role of their own accord, experimenters directly encouraged Guards to adopt roles and act tough in a manner consistent with tenets of identity leadership The History Channel just did a great summary of the original experiment and some of the controversies: history.com/articles/stanfor… You can read our re-analysis here: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3138…
3
23
2
83
5,941
Ethan Porter retweeted
50
781
48
13,473
190,101
Ethan Porter retweeted
The AI mathocalypse: “It feels like something written by someone who’s on psychedelics. So much unclear and doesn’t make sense. Lots of name dropping of previous work without discussing why it can be used despite impossibility results Basically the paper is so horribly written that it’s impossible to read it without AI help.” scottaaronson.blog/?p=10169
3
9
5
114
13,218
Ethan Porter retweeted
That's one way to get a foreword.
126
750
88
15,021
938,982
Precisely the wrong approach. We don't actually have to give up on papers! New in @chronicle How to Assign Research Papers Again Three ways to counter AI and restore confidence in the integrity of student writing (link below)
The head of the philosophy department at Williams College downplays the pedagogical value of writing: “What if we are mistaken in treating writing as the highest cultivation of thought? The evidence that supports this belief is thin at best. Writing can be useful cognitive scaffolding for memory and self-regulated learning, but the notion that it is the best process for developing thinking skills is a fairly recent idea, traceable to the 1970s writing-across-the-curriculum movement.”
3
20
3
77
43,618
Ethan Porter retweeted
You have my attention, Johns Hopkins University Press
3
89
5
1,402
28,146
The literacy crisis is real. A friend sent me this: this is an essay that successfully got someone admitted to Harvard.
707
533
412
20,407
1,923,220
Everyone needs to update ASAP. If you don't use AI (so you can't detect its characteristic writing patterns yourself) and you don't know about @pangram, you are probably being fooled.
On the French novel that won all the prizes: the publisher is saying "fake news! AI detectors are junk", etc. They are going to find themselves embarrassed because they simply don't use AI: anyone who does frequently will see the AI patterns immediately if they read the text. 1/2
3
2
33
7,994
I don’t care about Navier-Stokes. I want to see AI solve the Voynich manuscript.
205
224
59
2,578
154,333
Ethan Porter retweeted
Notice the role reversal. Universities, whose comparative advantage is supposed to be basic research with diffuse and uncertain social returns, increasingly justify themselves through "impact," donor appeal, media visibility, and other measurable near-term social outcomes. Meanwhile, frontier tech companies, whose comparative advantage is commercially useful innovation, spend conspicuous resources on pure intellectual prestige goods. Theorem proving, open math conjectures, fundamental science, benchmarks with obscure immediate commercial value.
16
79
7
582
35,082
This is what happens when you’re so accustomed to the benefits of modernity - sanitation, clean food & water, low infant mortality - that you forget where it all came from, how much effort it took to build, & how bad things were before. This is the literal definition of decadence
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
129
2,175
23
18,458
972,329