
Fuck Pump Fun launched on @standard_rsv CA: 0xD178A1E0b7Ab58a5F4801Ecea1e0fB35C9Ca685a
Joined October 2026
- Tweets91
- Following1
- Followers131
- Likes45
Pinned Tweet
The pump fun game has always been rigged. They amplify some of the worst on chain actors. They don’t get paid when you hold coins. Only when you deploy. Constant churn. Every new entrant who downloads the app to check out crypto gets rinsed and never comes back. That’s why they are paying all the grifters massive call out rewards. Keep the churn going as long as possible.
F that. F pumpfun. $FPUMP
F pump
The top 5 was holding multi million dollar positions before the contest started. Any slight swing up on any of those coins gives them massive pnl. So it’s not really a trading competition. It’s a who is dumb enough to put large positions on a vibe coded mobile trading app competition.
My squad slammed a 100k mc coin with about 6-7k total and it ran up to 200k profit before pnl was wrongly removed from the contest.
Isn’t that the crypto dream? Isn’t that what pump fun wants?
Find the right internet trend and capitalize on it? That’s what their marketing says!
Fuck pumpfun.
Are you fucking kidding me????
FUCK PUMP FUN
FPUMP
Imagine holding almost exclusively one coin for the Squad Competition!
BATONARMY and BATONARMY2 are doing exactly that, holding almost $1,000,000 worth of $baton combined!
FPUMP retweeted
Meanwhile the Dabal squad owned most supply of GINNACOIN which died within an hour
I think the next days will be dangerous...
dislclaimer: @Dior100x managed to end up with a loss
A ‘F*ck Pumpfun’ coin helped a squad reach #1 in Pump Fun’s $2.5M competition
Then suddenly their entire PnL disappeared
They dropped from #1 to #492
Here's where it gets interesting:
@json1444 said they removed the PnL since it was heavily bundled
Meanwhile the token was launched through @standard_rsv
Standard lets projects airdrop tokens to Charter holders, but claiming requires burning their NFT and giving up their position
fair or cheating?
FPUMP retweeted
Pumpfun just admitted with this post that they promote the their chosen ones. Not everyone has the Chance to make money. It's just their Choosen ones. Instead of being silent they promote their PUMPFUN Links so people trail them even harder.
Meanwhile DABAL launched Ginnan and rugged it at 400k.
Thats what .@Pumpfun is promoting.
Thats what you guys talk good. Either way some of y'all have just 3 braincells or y'all just puppets who fight for a badge that they never gonna get.
Don’t buy any coins on pumpfun promoted by any of the other squads. They can’t sell their bundles on you if you don’t buy.
Get FPUMP to say f pump.
Pumpfun: the launchpad that doesn’t understand smart contract.
F pump
it was brought to my attention that a token launched on standard's launchpad was removed from pumpfun's competition for "bundling" because 80% of its supply sits in one place
i want to clarify what this actually is, and why its the complete opposite of a bundle and actually a beneficial mechanism
first, what a bundle is: a deployer buys most of the supply across multiple wallets at launch, hides that theyre connected, waits for buyers, then dumps on them (or in the *optimistic* case, uses them for "supply control"). bundles are opaque and hide a token's real float
standard's launchpad lets deployers do what's called a "charter drop" which is the complete opposite of a bundle:
- charters are nfts held by participants in the @standard_rsv ecosystem. each holder has spent over 3 eth to join the protocol, and they've proven to be aligned, long term supporters of the projects they like
- deployers can choose to airdrop a percentage of supply (up to 80%) to charter holders. these tokens are locked in a vault contract, and charter holders cant access them unless they BURN their charter
- the airdrop isnt controlled by the deployer. the tokens sit in a single public contract, 0xb8748E02f07dd80F1DB99A49F92546B2210D844d, with no admin key and no owner withdrawal
- nothing is hidden. anyone can verify the mechanism and lock onchain, which is the opposite of a hidden bundle
- charter drops cant be dumped instantly. the tokens are split across every charter holder, not one wallet, and holders only receive their share by burning their charter. it's a public token lock with a real cost to unlock, not free supply ready to hit the market
were glad bundled tokens are being policed, but if this counts as a bundle, we'd urge you to look at the majority of the other tokens in this competition
as a side not, over 4M USD of tokens has been airdropped to charters and we've seen less than 5 charter burn to receive the airdropped tokens
since we're on the topic anyway, let's talk about market cap versus liquidity on charter drop tokens. dashboards count the locked 80% in market cap, so the market cap to liquidity ratio looks thin
but, measured against tradable supply, the pool is deeper than on other launchpad tokens since the same amount of liquidity supports a much smaller float, because most of the supply is locked. treating locked supply as tradable gives a misleading ratio
it was brought to my attention that a token launched on standard's launchpad was removed from pumpfun's competition for "bundling" because 80% of its supply sits in one place
i want to clarify what this actually is, and why its the complete opposite of a bundle and actually a beneficial mechanism
first, what a bundle is: a deployer buys most of the supply across multiple wallets at launch, hides that theyre connected, waits for buyers, then dumps on them (or in the *optimistic* case, uses them for "supply control"). bundles are opaque and hide a token's real float
standard's launchpad lets deployers do what's called a "charter drop" which is the complete opposite of a bundle:
- charters are nfts held by participants in the @standard_rsv ecosystem. each holder has spent over 3 eth to join the protocol, and they've proven to be aligned, long term supporters of the projects they like
- deployers can choose to airdrop a percentage of supply (up to 80%) to charter holders. these tokens are locked in a vault contract, and charter holders cant access them unless they BURN their charter
- the airdrop isnt controlled by the deployer. the tokens sit in a single public contract, 0xb8748E02f07dd80F1DB99A49F92546B2210D844d, with no admin key and no owner withdrawal
- nothing is hidden. anyone can verify the mechanism and lock onchain, which is the opposite of a hidden bundle
- charter drops cant be dumped instantly. the tokens are split across every charter holder, not one wallet, and holders only receive their share by burning their charter. it's a public token lock with a real cost to unlock, not free supply ready to hit the market
were glad bundled tokens are being policed, but if this counts as a bundle, we'd urge you to look at the majority of the other tokens in this competition
as a side not, over 4M USD of tokens has been airdropped to charters and we've seen less than 5 charter burn to receive the airdropped tokens
since we're on the topic anyway, let's talk about market cap versus liquidity on charter drop tokens. dashboards count the locked 80% in market cap, so the market cap to liquidity ratio looks thin
but, measured against tradable supply, the pool is deeper than on other launchpad tokens since the same amount of liquidity supports a much smaller float, because most of the supply is locked. treating locked supply as tradable gives a misleading ratio
FPUMP retweeted
A ‘F*ck Pumpfun’ coin helped a squad reach #1 in Pump Fun’s $2.5M competition
Then suddenly their entire PnL disappeared
They dropped from #1 to #492
Here's where it gets interesting:
@json1444 said they removed the PnL since it was heavily bundled
Meanwhile the token was launched through @standard_rsv
Standard lets projects airdrop tokens to Charter holders, but claiming requires burning their NFT and giving up their position
fair or cheating?

























