Feminist not misandrist. Abuse is not a gendered crime.
Joined August 2014
- Tweets80.1K
- Following1.4K
- Followers23.9K
- Likes241K
Pinned Tweet
Re: abusers.
It's hard to find empathy, but it's important to remember no one becomes an abuser in a vacuum. Every instance of abuse comes from a place of trauma.
Not to say abusers should be given passes. Support their victims/do no harm. In rare cases abusers can recover.
This is child abuse. This is not age appropriate.
4 year old little boys deserve to be 4 year old little boys, not have their own childhood and innocence taken from them through mothers forcing them to take responsibility for adult crimes.
Femme retweeted
‘The falsely accused men; The forgotten abuse victims and how to help them’
counsellorinleeds.co.uk/wp-c…
To be clear, this is sex trafficking. This is sex trafficking, by another name. Many children are sex trafficked by parents, and many of those parents are mothers.
komonews.com/news/nation-wor…
"Unfortunately, the CTDC reports that in 36% of human trafficking cases, children/youth were intentionally sexually exploited by family members looking for a payoff in the form of drugs, money, or something else of value. In a recent study, 64% of these traffickers were mothers, who were assisted by a nonrelative trafficker,"
ctac.uky.edu/news/familial-s…
People continue to laugh at and belittle men made to penetrate by women.
If you knew approximately 40% of MTP victims weren't men at all, but male children under 18, would you laugh?
researchgate.net/publication…
926 students responded, resulting in a 15% response rate, with 519 of those responding identifying as women.
Of the men who responded, 8% reported sexual assault.
35% of Cornell undergraduate women said they had been sexually assaulted since arriving on campus, according to the university’s 2025 survey.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Cornell's 2025 SARM survey found 35% of responding undergraduate women reported nonconsensual sexual contact since entering Cornell. The university notes the 15% response rate limits the reliability of estimates of nonconsensual sexual contact and related harms. statements.cornell.edu/2025/20251104-… news.cornell.edu/stories/2025/1…
Femme retweeted
We talk constantly about protecting victims — so protect all of them.
Spread the message.
Men can be raped, abused, manipulated and assaulted too. Their trauma does not become less real because they’re male, and speaking about male victims does not erase women.
It means the standard is consistent.
#MenToo — men are victims too.
🤖 Made with AI
"Adult heterosexual men were less likely than adult heterosexual women to report
IPV by their female partners (McCarrick et al., 2016). One reason for this was that
women were arrested 62% of the time as compared to men who were arrested 91% of the
time by law enforcement officers (Espinoza & Warner, 2016). This was referred to as
gendered stigmatization (Espinoza &Warner, 2016). Ceelan et al. (2013) found that out
of 372 men who participated in a study as victims of IPV from women partners, less than
32% spoke to the police, and less than 15% of them officially reported the abuse."
media.proquest.com/media/hms…
Femme retweeted
Regretting consensual sex the day after is not rape
I’ve worked/spoken with several men over the years (& some remorseful false accusers) where sex regret was unreasonably interpreted as rape
Responsibility comes with GETTING consent AND CLEARLY GIVING or declining it
So, my account was false flagged and locked. Over my opinion on abortion. A couple of things:
Too many of you are just hateful, abusive people. And you're petty cowards.
Your actions caused me to let my friend down. We were to do a podcast. Not cool.
Last: I was accused of promoting eugenics by stating "healthy conception." Not at all. What I meant by "healthy" conception is: up to 30% of pregnancies spontaneously miscarry. Up to 70% of those miscarriages are caused by anomaly in the fetus.
Too many believe-and stated- medical care was available and provided in this event. Not true. There's a huge number of people who don't understand miscarriage or how abortion laws have impacted healthcare. Women ARE dying for non-viable pregnancy.
Miscarriage is loss before 20 weeks. That's halfway, people. That's a lot of blood, tissue, amniotic fluid. Unlike the movies, women don't wake up, start bleeding, and the miscarriage is over in a day or hours. A miscarriage can take weeks. Tissues can be retained. A woman can very slowly bleed to death over the course. A woman can go septic. The body can be unable to complete miscarriage. Before abortion laws changed, a D&C was standard.
But- a fetal heartbeat can be found days into a miscarriage. Medically the pregnancy is not viable. Legally these women are sent home at increased chance of death as a D&C now skirts the line to criminal prosecution. And women ARE dying.
An estimated 50 women have died from miscarriage complications. Blood transfusions in Texas alone have spiked, with one woman actually bleeding to death. Why? Instead of performing D&C they give repeated blood transfusions to keep the mother alive while her body struggles to miscarry. She needs medical care the industry can no longer provide.
Flag me all you want- it's funny. It's funny I was flagged for telling someone who said they'd die for their kids to put themselves at real-life risk of that, just like the women who become pregnant do. You talk real big but even the imaginary situation offends you so much. Well, it's not imaginary for the women living with and dying for your opinions.
It's not a simple "responsibility " choice. The woman could have had no intention at all of ever aborting. She could be a woman dying on the table with a very much wanted baby, and thats what you refuse to see.
propublica.org/article/texas…
I did go on to have healthy pregnancies, but another personal note: my last flagged high for severe birth defects. I was recommended for amniocentesis, but this carried a near equal rate of causing miscarriage as the calculated risk rate of her flagged disorders.
I refused amniocentesis and had a series of high definition ultrasounds instead. When her heart read unaffiliated, I kept my pregnancy and had my child.
But the considerations were heavy, and I won't lie. It's again not just "be responsible." "Responsible" looked a lot different than simple "take care of the child you made." "Responsible" looked like: a severely disabled child will be born that will outlive me. "Responsible" looked like visiting responsibility for that severely disabled child on their older siblings. It looked like making a choice to limit their lives and emotionally/financially burden them in ways they never asked for.
"Responsible" looked like the possibility of a severely disabled child living their lives in state run institutions following my death.
In the end she had nothing she was flagged for. But again- in the end? Your simple arguments have no place in real life, and you can not judge what you have not lived.
The frequency in which people, general, apply moral argument to justify immoral policy is appalling. We no longer live in a rational society vested in the interest of all its members; we live in a society vested in perpetuating moral stance.
This has reached a critical point when it comes to beneficial/benevolent sexism; whether feminism wants to admit it or not, the morality of society has always been geared to protection of women.
Abused men are not recognized or aided; morally we are told to care more about abused women. Why? Abuse rates are the same.
Abused and murdered children are ignored and excused, because morally we're told their mother's mental state was more important.
The moral stance of "protect women" has become a flag in which to marginalize any number of alternative demographics in daily life.
And yet, all we read about is how misogynistic society is. The truth feminism doesn't want to confront is misogyny is a coin. One side protection; opposite oppression. You can't reduce it to only the face that benefits.
Femme retweeted
If a gendered behavior is considered sexist when it disadvantages women, but desirable or romantic when it advantages women, then the underlying standard isn't simply opposition to gender roles. It's opposition to particular female gender roles.
Its not about equality.
I really don't care about the insults. I will forever be pro choice.
Nearly 2 women die a day due to pregnancy and childbirth complications in the US.
In states where abortion remains legal, maternal deaths fell 21%.
Anyone who calls a woman selfish for choosing to not risk her life doesn't value women's lives.
Also- noted not a single WOMAN attacked me. Only men, who don't risk their lives to have children.
bmj.com/content/389/bmj.r879
I'm a woman. I've carried children. Your view and statement of pregnancy as a single static condition is far too simplified, and far too common.
This is the mistake behind banning abortion.
It's not a simple " use protection" argument, and anyone who takes the time to consider this knows this to be true.
Not only are there considerations of human error and assault, there are considerations to life changes and health impact.
We have women dying, or women's bodies on life support. Why? The concept of a fetus has become more important than the living, breathing woman whose body is supporting it.
This is not right, and I'd like to see the oversimplified focus of a fetus to shift back to at least include the considerations to the health of the woman.
The fact so many have been offended by this, and my statements to bring the focus back to the physical reality of pregnancy for the woman, is disheartening.
If you can look at your mother, daughter, friend, girlfriend and wife- and imagine yourself telling this woman that you care for she's a cunt, she's selfish, she's an idiot- any of those insults thrown at me- because she won't give up her life and health to give another person the OPPORTUNITY of a life (because again-pregnancy doesn't guarantee a living child) then by all means stand firm in your pro-life stance.
But I'm fairly certain given the reality of holding a woman's hand as she crashes out in the matter of hours from pre-eclampsia, watching a woman hemmorage to death, seeing a 15 year old girl become pregnant and the reality of her and that child's life, or a father and children crying as mom codes on the delivery bed, or both parents working two jobs while older siblings care for younger siblings, barely having enough food and homes burning down due to stove heat in the winter- these realities will likely shake your staunch pro-life stance to its core.
I don't believe in late term abortion. But heartbeat laws? Every pregnancy matters trope? This is a fairy tale for a world where every conception is healthy, every family has food and housing, every child lives in a government where thwy are valued with schooling and medical care, where children aren't raped.