SkankyGelato retweeted
My dear James.
There is a look particular to men like you. The swept fringe. The good posture. The slightly startled expression of a man who has just been asked a question he did not draft the answer to.
You have been wearing it in public for ten years. And in ten years you have never won an election. Not a ward. Not a selection. Not a hopeless by-election nobody else wanted. No returning officer has ever had to read your name out loud.
You are, of course, the son of a company man. Brian Schneider, chief executive of a listed Soho property firm, who died at forty-eight leaving a five million pound question mark over the family accounts. Daddy's dusty legacy, except in your case it was not dust. It was a writ.
And you would still like to be thought a radical. Radicalised by Iraq. Radicalised by the crash. This is the story. Bless.
You were at Winchester.
WHERE RADICALISATION COMES WITH A CHAPEL
Dragon. Winchester. St Paul's. Trinity College, Oxford. Theology.
Winchester has been producing the men who run Britain for six hundred years. It does not teach you to think, it teaches you to sit in a room full of powerful people and behave as though the room belongs to you, because for six centuries it has. One of its recent outputs became Prime Minister. It is not a school. It is a factory with a waiting list.
Then the house. Five storeys on Regent's Park Road, Primrose Hill, later valued at seven million. A second at Glen Tanar, near Balmoral. The fees. Cricket at the Gaieties, Pinter's club, where you were vice-captain.
This is the man who promised to take on "the old and corrupt ruling elite." He was not taking them on. He was commuting from them.
AND THE MONEY WAS NEVER ENTIRELY CLEAN
Spring 2004. You are sixteen. Your father dies. Days later a bailiff arrives at night with a writ freezing every account the family holds.
The company's case, in the High Court: hundreds of cheques written to himself over seven years, using a rule that let him sign alone below twenty thousand pounds. Over five million pounds. Half the value of the firm. Books allegedly falsified to disguise it as payments to two shell companies in Gibraltar and Panama. Two point three million into joint accounts at Coutts and Lloyds. Four hundred and seventy-four thousand to a mistress, for jewellery.
Settled 2008. Two point three million paid. No liability admitted, which is the civil way of saying everyone agreed to stop discussing it.
So the fees, the house, the estate and the cricket were funded, on the public record, out of money your father was accused of taking from a company that was not his. You were thirteen when the writ landed. You have never had to explain a word of it. It is not in the Wikipedia entry. It is not in the Verso biography. Funny, that.
FOUR MONTHS
You read theology, chaired the university Liberal Democrats, and left the party when it broke its tuition fees pledge. Not over Iraq. Over a policy that would have cost you money. You were nineteen.
Then journalism. Think Africa Press, then New African. Writing about African poverty from a desk in London. You learned to explain the poor to the poor.
May 2015 you joined the Labour Party. June, Corbyn declared. October, you co-founded Momentum. Four months, from new member to founding father of a national insurgency. Credit where due. It was quick.
THE SOOTHING THING
"We are not campaigning for any deselection."
You told the Huffington Post that. And Sky. And the Express. And the Mail on Sunday. All while Neil Kinnock was warning on the record that the party was being turned into a sectarian ultra-left branch. Meanwhile your people were pulling the triggers in constituency after constituency.
You were not quite lying. You were doing something more useful. Saying the soothing thing while the machine did the other thing. You have never stopped.
October 2016, the reward. Director of Strategic Communications to the Leader of the Opposition. Twenty-nine years old. No seat, no branch, no union, no service. Just a good telephone manner and the correct opinions at the correct moment.
THE ROOM
7 March 2018. The Telegraph puts a 280-page dossier on the Palestine Live Facebook group to the party. Three members suspended within hours. One is Glyn Secker, secretary of Jewish Voice for Labour.
At 17:12 that afternoon you text the party's head of disputes. Why Secker? What about David Birkett? Birkett was an actual Holocaust denier.
Milne follows within the hour. Then Andrew Murray. Then Corbyn. Three days later Secker is restored. The denier stays out in the cold.
When Panorama pointed at this, the Leader's Office issued a flat denial. "The Leader's Office did not intervene." You had worked, in your own words, "very closely" on that rebuttal. Asked whether you approved the wording, you declined to answer.
The emails show you intervened first. John Ware called the denial "thoroughly disingenuous." Your reply was to go on Twitter and take the whistleblower apart by name, within hours of Labour apologising to him in the High Court. You also wrote a thread on the seventeen days it took to suspend Birkett, and left out the seventeen days of officials begging Milne and Murphy by email. PLEASE can we get agreement. PLEEEEEEASE. All of it sitting in your own timeline, unmentioned.
Ware's phrase for the performance was "pinhead dancing." It is hard to improve on.
In 2019 you primarily wrote the party's pamphlet on antisemitism. Deleted under Starmer. In April 2018 Momentum formally conceded the problem was "more widespread than many of us had understood" and not "rightwing smears." By 2023 you were calling it a smear campaign.
December 2019. 32.1 per cent. 202 seats. Worst since 1935. Your considered view afterwards was that Labour should have learned from Dominic Cummings. The man who beat you.
ELEVEN WORDS
January 2025. A quarter of a million girls. Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Oxford, Bradford, Oldham. Decades of it.
Charlie Peters asked whether you regretted how the Corbyn period had handled it.
"I don't think we did very much."
Eleven words, and the only fully honest ones in the file. Then you explained that successive governments were to blame. All of them. Including yours.
TEN WEEKS
2024, field operation for Corbyn in Islington North. 2025, architect of Your Party. It launched to 800,000 sign-ups and within days the co-founders were briefing against each other and exchanging legal threats. September, you walked.
Ten weeks.
Twenty candidates at the May 2026 locals. No seats. The party split. In October the Met opened a criminal investigation into its founding and arrested a man in his twenties under the Computer Misuse Act.
You were gone by then. You are always gone by then.
THE WIFE
In 2024 you married Sophie Nazemi. She is the Downing Street Press Secretary. The voice of Keir Starmer.
You are the voice of the movement built to bury Keir Starmer. There is no register of interests for a marriage and no disclosure duty on a private citizen, so nothing has to be declared and nothing ever is.
THE PATTERN
Join, found a faction, four months. Leader's office at twenty-nine, no mandate. Restore an ally, deny intervening. Attack the whistleblower. Worst defeat in eighty-four years. Out, and straight into an unaccountable international network. Call it a smear. Marry the government's press secretary. Build a party, admit the movement did nothing on grooming gangs, quit in ten weeks.
Four vehicles. Four collapses. One constant. And never once the man who has to face the count.
That is not luck. Insurgents who take seats become answerable for them. Insurgents who only write the script keep the reputation and the bookings.
Thirty-nine years old. Six hundred years of Winchester behind you. Not one vote.
Do carry on, James. The green room is that way.
If you strip everything else away, that men like this will try and dismantle disabled sport to squeeze trans identifying men into women’s sport is illustrative that this is just male entitlement. Disabled athlete face more than the physical disadvantages at the point of 1/
Replying to @BettsCaro
why would women and disabled people not have access to fair sport if the sports are tiered by performance level
SkankyGelato retweeted
This has destroyed the reputation of academia more generally.
Yes, studies do show that trans women have no athletic advantage, and literally everybody knows that is false, and so when a University releases a study showing that, we question the very nature of this research and the people doing it.
This is a pathetic level of cope.
You’ve been exposed completely as a mindless morally void ideologue and your attempts to pretend she’s done anything other than display your dipshittery to the world are risible
SkankyGelato retweeted
Replying to @art_brink
No. It's not up to me to build lockable cibicles. I'm asking you whether you believe - in the currently existing communal changing rooms - whether a teenage girl should accept undressing next to an adult male as long as he doesn't physically abuse her?
SkankyGelato retweeted
You've avoided nearly all of my questions, Norah, because you're literally incapable of answering them. Your mind is firmly closed to any evidence or facts that undermine your preferred narrative. You consider it immoral for anyone to even question you, even though you voluntarily and confidently entered this discussion. You're like a flat-earther. Nothing I or anyone else says to you will permeate your stubborn quasi-religious beliefs, because to change your mind would take away a core part of your self image, which is as somebody who is kinder and better and more righteous than the nasty people still advocating for the safety of women and girls.
You repeat your thought-terminating clichés and unevidenced assertions, which I assume sound clever inside your echo chamber, but which, outside it, make you appear not only dim, but a total moral vacuum. Increased risk to females? Who cares. Women threatened by violence? Of course those poor trans-identified men lash out when they meet resistance! What is a gender identity? You can't really say, but like the flat-earther, you're sure it exists, because your tribe is held together by belief in it, and pride themselves on their blind faith in it.
I keep waiting for a single gender ideologue or trans activist to truly engage with the facts, but all of you sheer away from them like horses from fireworks. It truly is like talking to cult members who're incapable of engaging in rational debate and just keep chanting the mantras, consigning all serious questions to the 'evil' bin.
I've been told I'm on the wrong side of history thousands of times. By debating people like you, I've come to realise that your ilk's idea of the 'right side of history' means stripping women and girls' of their rights, excusing male violence against women, siding with those issuing death and rape threats and attempting to suppress critical thought and freedom of speech.
Maybe, like the flat-earthers, you genuinely think history will vindicate you. I believe people will look back on this period and analyse your arguments, not because they admire them, but because they're trying to fathom how so many supposedly intelligent people fell, hook, line and sinker for a bunch of vacuous, post-modern, pseudo-intellectual cobblers, while being completely indifferent to the real world harm they were enabling.
SkankyGelato retweeted
So in summary: you want all women's single-sex spaces and services taken away to accommodate men who claim their 'gender identity feels different from what [their] body is.' You can't explain what a gender identity is, or explain what it means to 'feel' female, as opposed to being female, but you still think society should reconfigure itself around an unfalsifiable concept that cannot be objectively observed or proven, in spite of the well-evidenced risk to women and girls this poses.
SkankyGelato retweeted
Heartbroken and unable to believe it is true, we announce the tragic passing of Jesús de Miguel Alamada on Tuesday 3 November 2026 at 8.00 am.
There are no words of comfort. We stand with his devastated family, loved ones and the whole CD Tenerife community.
🖤 RIP
SkankyGelato retweeted
Mate, I’m transsexual, have been for several decades during which time I’ve conducted extensive research on ‘trans’ ideology in Europe and Latin America. As an academic I deal in objective reality not delusional sentiments. And I’m not, of course, a girl. Neither are you.
SkankyGelato retweeted
Children referred to the Tavistock’s Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) clinic, for puberty-halting drugs among other services, were 𝟭𝟬 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲 to have a parent who was a 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝘅 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿.
A lot of us were very willing to have a debate without heat, @stonewalluk, and the reason that never happened wasn't because gender critical feminists didn't want one.
While we were trying to get you to listen to our concerns, your former CEO was telling a BBC boss that gay people not wanting to include the opposite sex in their dating pool was 'sexual racism'. While we were pointing out the homophobia inherent in gender ideology, Stonewall ambassador Alex Drummond (a bearded, heterosexual man who'd had no surgery and taken no cross-sex hormones but liked wearing skirts), was going into schools to talk to students about his 'lesbian' identity. @BluskyeAllison, who actually is a lesbian, was subject to unlawful discrimination at her place of work for tweeting: ‘Stonewall recently hired Morgan Page, a male bodied person who ran workshops with the sole aim of coaching heterosexual men who identify as lesbians on how they can coerce young lesbians into having sex with them. Page called [it] “overcoming the cotton ceiling”.’
When the UK Supreme Court upheld women's right to single sex spaces, you issued a statement expressing your unhappiness about the ruling. In her report on your unhappy influence at the University of Essex, you were found by barrister @akuareindorf to have misrepresented the law as it related to women's rights: '[Stonewall have] stated the law as Stonewall would prefer it to be, rather than the law as it is’.
In 2018, you publicly advised schools to shred a research pack saying there were risks to puberty blockers, in spite of the fact that you aren't a medical charity and that there was already credible evidence that puberty blockers are neither irreversible nor harm-free. Meanwhile you produced your own educational packs, recommending a children's book, for ages 5-9, in which the parent 'is neither a man, nor a woman – they’re non-binary.' In July 2022, Stonewall sent out a tweet that read ‘Research suggests that children as young as two recognise their trans identity'.
@thetimes has reported how you've sought to control the language used by NHS trusts and government on their social-media accounts. Organisations would get points from you for replacing commonly understood words with ideologically approved terms, eg, 'birthing parent' instead of 'mother'. thetimes.com/uk/society/arti…
In short, you took a maximalist position on gender identity ideology, which you attempted to enforce by diktat. You refused to acknowledge that you'd hitched your wagon to a cause that, unlike civil rights, gay rights or women's rights, sought to strip rights from others. You sought to curtail everyone's right to freedom of speech and belief by controlling what it was permissible to think and say, through the management and political class. You have argued against women's and girl's rights to their own spaces, their sports and to assemble without men. Your former CEO tried to shame gay women/men into dating the opposite sex if the latter claimed to be female/male.
Your mantra was 'no debate' because, like all totalitarians, you preferred slogans, bullying and infiltration of powerful institutions to talking to opponents. You appear to have had no concern for the lowly people your ideology was harming: gender confused kids, female rape victims, female prisoners, regular people hounded and investigated at their places of work for refusing to accept the new mandates on sex and gender issued from on high.
Your 'activism' has been a disaster for those trans-identified people who really do just want to get on with their lives in peace. You have besmirched the name of an organisation many of us were once proud to donate to, the charity that was partly responsible for securing the legal right of gay people to marry, which a lot of us thought would never happen in our lifetimes. The milquetoast words quoted below do not erase a decade of gender activism that has been disastrous not only for individuals but for society as a whole.
There was once a debate to be had, but until you acknowledge the direct harm you've caused, it is no more possible to debate you than to persuade a person in the throes of a drug-induced psychosis that they are not, in fact, the reincarnated Christ.
SkankyGelato retweeted
A lot of us were very willing to have a debate without heat, @stonewalluk, and the reason that never happened wasn't because gender critical feminists didn't want one.
While we were trying to get you to listen to our concerns, your former CEO was telling a BBC boss that gay people not wanting to include the opposite sex in their dating pool was 'sexual racism'. While we were pointing out the homophobia inherent in gender ideology, Stonewall ambassador Alex Drummond (a bearded, heterosexual man who'd had no surgery and taken no cross-sex hormones but liked wearing skirts), was going into schools to talk to students about his 'lesbian' identity. @BluskyeAllison, who actually is a lesbian, was subject to unlawful discrimination at her place of work for tweeting: ‘Stonewall recently hired Morgan Page, a male bodied person who ran workshops with the sole aim of coaching heterosexual men who identify as lesbians on how they can coerce young lesbians into having sex with them. Page called [it] “overcoming the cotton ceiling”.’
When the UK Supreme Court upheld women's right to single sex spaces, you issued a statement expressing your unhappiness about the ruling. In her report on your unhappy influence at the University of Essex, you were found by barrister @akuareindorf to have misrepresented the law as it related to women's rights: '[Stonewall have] stated the law as Stonewall would prefer it to be, rather than the law as it is’.
In 2018, you publicly advised schools to shred a research pack saying there were risks to puberty blockers, in spite of the fact that you aren't a medical charity and that there was already credible evidence that puberty blockers are neither irreversible nor harm-free. Meanwhile you produced your own educational packs, recommending a children's book, for ages 5-9, in which the parent 'is neither a man, nor a woman – they’re non-binary.' In July 2022, Stonewall sent out a tweet that read ‘Research suggests that children as young as two recognise their trans identity'.
@thetimes has reported how you've sought to control the language used by NHS trusts and government on their social-media accounts. Organisations would get points from you for replacing commonly understood words with ideologically approved terms, eg, 'birthing parent' instead of 'mother'. thetimes.com/uk/society/arti…
In short, you took a maximalist position on gender identity ideology, which you attempted to enforce by diktat. You refused to acknowledge that you'd hitched your wagon to a cause that, unlike civil rights, gay rights or women's rights, sought to strip rights from others. You sought to curtail everyone's right to freedom of speech and belief by controlling what it was permissible to think and say, through the management and political class. You have argued against women's and girl's rights to their own spaces, their sports and to assemble without men. Your former CEO tried to shame gay women/men into dating the opposite sex if the latter claimed to be female/male.
Your mantra was 'no debate' because, like all totalitarians, you preferred slogans, bullying and infiltration of powerful institutions to talking to opponents. You appear to have had no concern for the lowly people your ideology was harming: gender confused kids, female rape victims, female prisoners, regular people hounded and investigated at their places of work for refusing to accept the new mandates on sex and gender issued from on high.
Your 'activism' has been a disaster for those trans-identified people who really do just want to get on with their lives in peace. You have besmirched the name of an organisation many of us were once proud to donate to, the charity that was partly responsible for securing the legal right of gay people to marry, which a lot of us thought would never happen in our lifetimes. The milquetoast words quoted below do not erase a decade of gender activism that has been disastrous not only for individuals but for society as a whole.
There was once a debate to be had, but until you acknowledge the direct harm you've caused, it is no more possible to debate you than to persuade a person in the throes of a drug-induced psychosis that they are not, in fact, the reincarnated Christ.
SkankyGelato retweeted
As a gay man, I'll say what a lot of us are thinking.
We fought to be left alone. To marry the man we love, keep our jobs, and live a quiet life.
We won.
Then woke activists took our letters, stapled on a dozen causes we never signed up for, and started calling us bigots for saying sex is real.
That isn't our movement anymore.
SkankyGelato retweeted
If you listen carefully it’s a misplaced anger at his own parents for not making him feel worthy that turned into raging jealousy of other children who had parents that lifted them up and poured into them. He’s projected all of that onto white people. He needs to mend his heart before thinking about running for any office. White ppl haven’t hurt him. He knows exactly who did. Notice how he doesn’t get the satisfaction he was craving when the interviewer simply anchors himself & doesn’t validate that experience. We should all do more of this. Don’t validate anyone’s experience for the sake of temporary bonding.
SkankyGelato retweeted
I'm going to tell you a truth that you don't want to hear, but it's based on years of evidence:
Men who claim to be trans women very often have erectile dysfunction disorders. This explains their virulent anger against women, especially.
There are many types. It could be fetish-induced, where a man can't get an erection because he's watched so much porn that human interaction means nothing.
It could also be a simple matter of insecurity over size.
But for the pornography cohort, after some time, the only way for them to achieve sexual arousal is by public humiliation and exhibitionism, or acting out their pornography viewership experience on the public.
They can no longer feel arousal unless it involves other people - because of the porn - and they become very, very angry when anyone gets in the way of their arousal.
I think that erectile dysfunction, and the anger behind it, plays a role in the vitriol against women from men who claim to be women.
Women are being taken to court and prosecuted, by men who are very angry that they broke their dicks in one way or another, usually with porn or fetishes, and this is a hill I will die on, because I know it to be true.




























