FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB) header
FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB) profile picture

I fade my Alpha and buy your Beta.

Joined February 2018
Photo by FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB)Photo by FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB)Photo by FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB)Photo by FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB)Photo by FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB)Photo by FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB)Photo by FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB)Photo by FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB)Photo by FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB)Photo by FlyingFish (@FlyingFishSB)
Quick look at the graphs: Yea, i'm in in for the tech. Second look at the graphs: Yea, in it for the tech and i also love the art.
3
17
Replying to @HyperliquidX
@HyperliquidX's IOC speed-bump mechanism has a flaw. Normally designed to protect makers in the interests of a more liquid market, it breaks down in periods of high activity. When blocks become full, pending modifies and cancels queue up for later blocks, so their latency increases. However, IOCs behave as though they have a separate blockspace dedicated for them, and their latency barely budges. You can see this in the lower left chart, showing latency of different order types during 19 activity bursts. The result is that under relatively modest load (25-30k tps), IOC + 8 bps (priority fee) orders can pick off resting liquidity before it has a chance to get out the way. Meanwhile, under higher load (35-40k tps), even IOCs without any priority fee can pick off resting liquidity. This, in my opinion, is antithetical to the ethos and design of the ALO and cancel prioritization mechanism and needs investigation by the team. It exists to reduce toxicity from HFT takers, and is breaking down precisely when most needed. It may also be exploitable. If IOCs really are insulated from the congestion affecting cancels and modifies, a malicious user could spam orders, delaying makers’ cancels while their own IOCs go through, and taking the liquidity left stale. One single example that occurred on AVAX today caused 1.3M$ of volume to be adversely selected for a total loss of ~13k$ over the subsequent 10 seconds. This affected us materially. Faced with such episodes of adverse selection, spreads and liquidity are undoubtedly worse than they could be otherwise. Would appreciate if anyone with a contact at HL could share this with the team.
33
28
14
446
50,244
> SFDP has done its job The king is dead, long live the king
Let's address a lot of the concerns over the recent SFDP changes. First, what were the changes? - 12-month time within SFDP - Auto-graduation at 300k SOL - 100 Validator max - Run your own validator These changes, as expected, were controversial. There are a lot of assumptions on where this stake will be going after the changes are in place. The job of SFDP has been three-fold: 1. Help bootstrap net new validators 2. Provide a healthy testnet 3. Get some validators testing changes early SFDP has done its job. Testnet exists, validators often find issues early, and a large amount of validators have started from SFDP. Solana is much larger now than when SFDP started. Solana's validator set has matured significantly, has an amazing community, and encounters new challenges that were never conceived of in the beginning. We've had a lot of feedback that SFDP is no longer reactive enough nor provides enough criteria given the ever-changing landscape of Solana. This feedback is heard and leads us to the next stage of delegation with a focus on continuing to improve network health and rewarding ecosystem contributors. SFDP will continue to exist for the newer validators and validators that contribute greatly to network health should also be rewarded. We have historically helped fund huge ecosystem contributors such as Blueshift through delegation outside of SFDP. We delegated to a number of validators that tried Frankendancer first. These among many other delegations are success stories that have both pushed Solana to new heights as well as helped improve network health. We're making a bet that we can be more proactive to future network health concerns, be more reactive to new issues, and help push Solana into this next stage with these changes. If you have feedback on these changes, please let me know. SFDP helped us get to where we are today. These changes are about getting to what comes next.
1
108
I can promise you, if you lp and care about accuracy, this is worth 0% of your time reading.
I can promise you, if you LP, this is 100% worth your time reading.
1
68
Great weekend recap Bonus points for mentioning Vitalik and cbBTC in 2nd and 3rd Get that marketing position filled asap
Your weekend recap in 3 stories 🧵👇
1
91
in the next few days you will hear about the next big novelty project launching on slowlana it will have a bunch of hype behind it will go as good as the last very hyped slowlana project
1
1
159
FlyingFish retweeted
A month ago, 27% of Solana’s stake that ran on TeraSwitch went offline. Today, 30% of the stake runs on TerraSwitch.
1/ Solana got 86% of the way to a halt this morning and it barely registered anywhere. 28.83% of staked SOL went delinquent. Finality stops at 33.34%. We added up the rewards lost across all 90 affected validators. 333 SOL.
2
3
13
810
That feature played a crucial role in the outcome. Delegators representing 2.79M SOL cast FOR votes via vote overrides, giving an option to stake that otherwise would have sat idle in the SGP-0002 vote.
Very cool seeing this come to fruition. When Solana governance v0 was in the works there was no plan to allow stakers to vote. After working on TipRouter and chatting with @brian_smith_0 we came up with the idea to use a NCN to power voting and give stakers a voice.
1
3
228
2.5k credits went a long way with careful planning, efficient queries and a scrappy local dbt Most of my work on Dune came from curiosity and for fun Unfortunately, my usage doesn't justify the Analyst plan price Thanks for the insane solana.instruction_calls Start of a new era
Today we are announcing that we are making the @Dune free plan view only. Meaning you can still look at all the amazing dashboards on Dune, but not run queries without a paid plan. The simple reason is that compute costs for running flexible queries over large amounts of data is very costly. We will still offer incredible value for money self-serve plans at $65 and $349 per month where you have access to vast amounts of blockchain data with completely serverless and hassle free querying. You can also try our very popular and powerful Plus plan on a 14 day trial when you sign up for a free account. For years Dune has had a very generous free plan including free compute an data access. Hundreds of thousands of users have queried blockchain data with Dune, and millions of people have been exploring the dashboards created. We know of hundreds of users that have built a data career on top of Dune, and there are likely many more. We are grateful to everyone that’s been exploring this data together with us. I’m proud and humbled that we’ve gone from @mewwts, me, some blockchain data in a postgres db and a few users in a Telegram channel, to reaching millions with the Dune platform and community. During Dune’s 8+ years in business countless data providers have come and gone. And I can tell you that what is worse than losing access to free compute is to lose your mission critical data provider all together. The reason why we’ve been able to stick around, and will keep sticking around, is because we adjust to the market. Thousands of industry leading businesses rely on Dune for their blockchain data, and they can safely keep doing that. Some have called these plan changes the end of an era. And that might be right, but I think the new era is going to be bigger and more exciting. The blockchain industry is now mature enough that businesses and financial institutions are coming onchain at a blistering pace. Dune is all in on empowering them with onchain data. During this new era Dune data will keep reaching millions of people, businesses and AIs in our mission to make onchain finance observable.
1
3
373
. @world_xyz might have cured cancer
1
4
216
there is a chance my queries are broken
1
60
there is also a chance something funny is going on
31
TIL that @gmtrade_xyz traders take the weekends off to touch grass
1
1
147
. @world_xyz could just show how low their spreads are and stop their 9.9.2026 posts we know NFL is coming but still no Premier league markets to bet on
1
185
some really interesting shenanigans (market micro-structure) happening in polymarket combos
1
119
report coming soon unless i can replicate it
34
Remember to stay vigilant at all times! We are seeing some scams targeting members of the SolBlaze community with fake posts asking you to connect your wallet to a drainer website. Make sure to always verify information through official channels and report scammer accounts 🫡
16
7
1
60
2,250
Every successful betting exchange eventually realizes the spread is worth more than the commission.
1
1
131
*prediction markets
39
~$11M volume in a WC month @world_xyz did 2 things spot-on since launch 1. price execution 2. customer acquisition ARR looks great so far but volume has dropped a lot European footy comps coming back in 2 weeks Will #2 partner deliver again or will it choke world's growth?
1
3
140
Congrats on a new ath of open interest 57% of this in on Spain to lift the trophy
you should have learned by now to inverse trade me i'm hammering spain today
1
2
356
it's actually 63% when accounting for the World Cup winner market
54