Charlie Kirk Stan (@ForCharlie47) header
Charlie Kirk Stan (@ForCharlie47) profile picture

Christian ✝️ Proud WHITE American! ✊🏻🇺🇸 Republican-Socialist

USA
Joined December 2024
Photo by Charlie Kirk Stan (@ForCharlie47)Photo by Charlie Kirk Stan (@ForCharlie47)Photo by Charlie Kirk Stan (@ForCharlie47)Photo by Charlie Kirk Stan (@ForCharlie47)Photo by Charlie Kirk Stan (@ForCharlie47)Photo by Charlie Kirk Stan (@ForCharlie47)Photo by Charlie Kirk Stan (@ForCharlie47)Photo by Charlie Kirk Stan (@ForCharlie47)Photo by Charlie Kirk Stan (@ForCharlie47)
Republican Congressional Candidates/incumbents that got more raw votes than Trump thread. 🧵
7
5
1
58
21,815
Very smart by the Colom campaign.
Fascinating organizing tactic by the @scott_colom field campaign to stop knocking doors and start organizing workers who weren't being reached through traditional methods Kinda reminds me of Bernie with the meatpackers in Iowa
1
3
328
Can he go away please
Another one...after losing his Trump +12.6% #NJ02 seat to Democrat Zack Mullock, Republican Jeff Van Drew files FEC paperwork for 2028 (though the form notes 'this does not constitute a formal announcement of my candidacy for the 2028 election')
1
1
3
293
Charlie Kirk Stan retweeted
JD Vance says the Iran War was why Republicans lost so badly. Let's look at how people living on Fort Bragg voted in #ncpol (it's the really big precinct you can see here in Cumberland County) 2024: Richard Hudson (R) wins it with 50% 2026: Hudson gets just 27% of the vote
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
6
39
151
12,020
Charlie Kirk Stan retweeted
The only bright spot I can find in Pennsylvania is Tom Jones beat incumbent James Malone by 9 points. Strong performance by him considering the environment.
3
5
1
42
2,630
Charlie Kirk Stan retweeted
Joe Gruters oversaw Republicans losing 9 Senate Seats and losing 45 House Seats The only thing he should be chair of is “The Chair” that got blown into a million pieces Tuesday night
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump ENDORSES RNC Chair Joe Gruters post-2026 midterms “As Chairman, Joe turned the RNC into an efficient, focused, and powerful machine that will continue to empower the America First Agenda for many years to come.” “Joe Gruters should return as Chairman of the RNC to continue to build our Party, and be a trusted partner as we MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, and ensure Free and Fair Elections. Republicans everywhere should support him as he continues his mission at the RNC. Joe is 100% America First, the Grassroots LOVES him, and I know he will do an incredible job in 2028, and secure Great Success for Republicans all across our Country. Joe has my Complete and Total Endorsement — HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN! President DONALD J. TRUMP” This would set up Gruters to oversee the RNC for the 2028 election It appears to be Trump’s FIRST endorsement of the next cycle.
19
82
1,611
Charlie Kirk Stan retweeted
.@StephenM congrats. Please consider this as a course correction: 1. Ramp deportations 10x 2. Debank all illegals 3. Suspend all foreign visa programs We are on the precipice of losing the country and with the election results this possibility is closer than ever.
486
1,804
76
12,625
160,755
These people are so cucked 😭
Replying to @AFpost
I can't wait for Nick to tell me how to think about this.
1
11
466
So they’re going to give these Data Centers tax breaks so the tax money coming from them is just a net neutral so no benefit for Alabama except a few jobs per center.
Alabama is going to be the richest state in America lol
5
1
2
1,184
This is sad I hate how some Republicans think you can’t be pro family and vote against stuff like this.
Republicans are so reprehensible. How do you not feel like the nastiest and slimiest person ever when voting no on this?
8
3
65
7,135
Charlie Kirk Stan retweeted
536
1,920
198
24,130
1,181,559
Charlie Kirk Stan retweeted
2014 → 2020 → 2026 US Senate elections in Charlotte
13
42
17
755
44,357
Joe Gruters fucking sucks
🚨Just in: RNC Co-Chair KC Crosbie has announced that she will officially challenge Republican Party Chairman Joe Gruters in January to become the new Republican Party Chair
1
20
785
Charlie Kirk Stan retweeted
Democrats plan to “tackle” affordability, but they will not address the reason — massive borrowing, printing and spending — we have had and continue to have inflation in the first place. If anything, they will add gas to the fire like Biden did.
718
1,102
81
7,472
109,132
Charlie Kirk Stan retweeted
It's really a mystery how this generational talent lost by 12 points!
.@KenPaxtonTX: The future of our state and the future of our country ride on this race.
42
108
4
4,470
366,785
After knocking 1,000s and 1,000s of doors, of which included just as many liberal and swing voters as conservatives I can safety assure you nothing mattered outside of Trump. When you’re knocking doors for a state senate race and talking about the Epstein files more than road construction… something is up. I could not even count in my head the number of voters who didn’t even know David Crowley’s name, but identified him as the other guy” he was not “Team Trump” The Iran war and prices were brought up 20 times more than Wisconsin’s tax rate or school system, or whatever pet issue talking-heads want to shove in to explain victory/loss At the end of the day though when you pressed further beyond the initial “F*ck Trump reaction” the crux of the frustration was 9 times out of 10 was an expression of perceived corruption in the federal government. You can survive a bad economy or foreign policy blunders, you can’t survive it when people genuinely don’t think you give a fuck whatsoever. Unserious governance of hawking your next crypto coin or the ball-room. Trump and his orbit have controlled the party for over a decade. Something new will come, what that looks like I’m not sure. Democrats in Wisconsin will take their win as a mandate on the issues they ran on. We will see how that goes. I think it’s going to be a mistake, because it wasn’t why people voted for you.
18
31
9
219
13,295
It's going to be negative once revised this is one of the worst job markets in a long time it was way better under Biden.
US JOBS REPORT SMASHES EXPECTATIONS US employers added 165,000 jobs in October, nearly triple the 59,000 expected. 🔸 Nonfarm payrolls: +165K vs. +59K expected 🔸 Unemployment: 4.1% vs. 4.2% expected 🔸 Private payrolls: +159K 🔸 Wage growth: +0.37% monthly, +3.12% annually 🔸 September payrolls revised: +60K
6
15
1,596
We need to invest in New York State.
Insane that New York continued its rightward shift despite the nation being 16 points to the left of 2024, NYGOP really held their own despite the doomsday environment for Republicans Future looks bright over there long term
9
2
56
1,881
Charlie Kirk Stan retweeted
Now that the election is over- I can return to my true passion: Creating political comics 💪🏻🤠🇺🇸
1
6
39
759
Omg Mexicans were literally more Dem than 2016 this explains the shifts in Texas good lord.
Hispanic precincts by heritage, 2016 → 2024 → 2026: Mexican-American (TX): 🔵 D+39 → 🔵 D+16 → 🔵 D+53 Puerto Rican: 🔵 D+45 → 🔵 D+11 → 🔵 D+35 Venezuelan: 🔵 D+40 → 🔴 R+4 → 🔵 D+14 Cuban: 🔵 D+18 → 🔴 R+24 → 🔴 R+4 Every group moved right, then snapped back.
11
4
2
80
9,225
Oh so now after almost losing you come out and say this.
This quoted post is unavailable.
2
1
4
803