Andy T 🇬🇧Freedom is not free!

The great tragedy of the human rights industry as represented by the Attorney General Lord Squirmer is the way in which it inverts morality People who regard themselves as our moral superiors suddenly begin advocating for those who wish us harm, those who defend this country are pursued and harassed, and not only are the participants in this industry handsomely remunerated, but they’re showered with all of the laurels that the establishment can bestow: awards, lecture circuits, lavish dinners, even high political office. When will we turn things the right way up again?

I want to address an allegation directly, because Reform politicians seem determined to spread the idea that I am somehow working in coordination with the Conservative Party and Kemi Badenoch. Yes, I was a member of the Conservative Party. In 1993. My children have since been born and grown up. It was more than thirty years ago. Literally, a lifetime ago. Many of the Reform leadership certainly can’t say the same. Yes, I've met Kemi Badenoch. I speak to her occasionally. I like her personally. We have worked together in Parliament. She spoke positively about our rape gang inquiry, and I thanked her for it. Numerous Conservative MPs have supported my parliamentary work, including our inquiry. Esther McVey. Nick Timothy. Jack Rankin. Peter Bedford. I could go on. I am not going to apologise for that. I will work with anyone in Parliament who is prepared to help deliver meaningful change. We have achieved results by doing precisely that. Does that mean I forgive the Conservatives for what they did to Britain between 2010 and 2024? Absolutely not. It was a betrayal. I have literally established a national political party to fight them at the ballot box. I am delighted when we beat them, which is a growing amount. All that should be a fairly substantial clue… But opposing a political party does not require you to behave like a petulant child towards every single person associated with it. Conservative MPs believed I would do a good job on the Public Accounts Committee. I accepted the opportunity to scrutinise government spending and fight for British taxpayers. Again, absolutely no apologies. I think we have delivered results. Now let's compare that with Reform. Reform tried to have me imprisoned over false allegations. I would be in prison today if they had their way. Despite everything, I have repeatedly attempted to work with Reform MPs in Parliament. I have invited them to support initiatives, collaborate on important issues and help deliver results. Time and again, those invitations have been ignored. My emails don’t even get a reply. I happily sign their motions and support their efforts, I did earlier this week. The feeling is not mutual. They complain. They moan. They attack. They endlessly manufacture personal grievances. But ask them to put their animosities aside and actually achieve something together? Suddenly, it's total silence. I've received more constructive support in Parliament from Labour MPs than from Reform. Think about that. It is grievance politics at its most pathetic. Negative, unproductive and deeply unprofessional. My position is incredibly straightforward. At elections, we are opponents. In Parliament, we have a responsibility to get things done. I believe that is what our constituents want us to do. Maybe I’m wrong, but I think not. Reform claim we stand in more local council Reform seats than anyone else. Yes, because so many more Reform councillors resign in disgrace than any other party. We are moving towards standing in 100% of local council by-elections. We’ve stood in Reform seats, Labour seats, Tory seats. Everywhere and anywhere. I intend to fight both Reform and the Conservatives for every vote. I want Restore Britain to win over millions of people who previously voted for those parties. But that does not mean I have to insult everyone I disagree with, refuse to speak to political opponents or sabotage decent initiatives because somebody else might receive a little credit. I was elected to represent my constituents, not to participate in an endless Westminster playground feud. Do I like Kemi Badenoch and some other Conservative MPs personally? Yes. Will I work with them when it benefits the British people? Yes. Do I fundamentally oppose the Conservative Party's record and want Restore Britain to defeat them electorally? Yes. Their 14 years of power was an utter betrayal, and is largely responsible for the social, economic and demographic vandalism we have endured. All three things can be true. Any serious adult should be capable of understanding that. It is not difficult to comprehend. I will work with Conservatives. I will work with Labour. I will work with Reform, if they ever decide to behave constructively. Reform's increasingly nasty, brash and personally unpleasant approach to politics says far more about them than it does about me. It’s just downright rude. They seem to believe that refusing to work with anyone is a demonstration of strength. In my view, it’s a weakness that erodes our politics and fails our constituents. I have said it again and again. I will work with anyone in parliament to deliver for the British people. And I make no apologies for doing so.

Well here I am again - back in Reform. They have reactivated my membership account from 2022 and I still have the same membership number. Good to be back.😁

ChatGPT has now a big problem. Researchers at Oxford exposed a massive threat to large language models.” It’s called "Model Collapse." And it explains why the internet is about to become a toxic waste dump for Large Language Models. Right now, AI companies are scraping the entire web to train their next-generation models. But there’s a massive problem. The internet is no longer just human data. It is rapidly filling up with AI-generated text, images, and code. What happens when an AI trains on data generated by another AI? A new paper in Nature just gave us the answer. And it is terrifying. When AI models are recursively trained on AI-generated data, they suffer from irreversible brain damage. The researchers found that the model starts forgetting the "tails" of the original data distribution. The rare, weird, unique, and complex human nuances completely disappear. It's like making a photocopy of a photocopy. Every generation loses resolution. The output gets flatter, blander, and more generic, until the model completely collapses in on itself. For years, we thought the biggest bottleneck for AI was compute, getting enough H100 GPUs from Nvidia. This paper proves the real bottleneck is us. If we keep flooding the internet with synthetic AI slop, we will poison the very data pool required to build smarter models. The ultimate irony? We thought AI was going to make human creators obsolete. Instead, this research proves that verified, genuine human data is about to become the most valuable commodity in the tech industry.

Restore's growth has been unusually rapid in British politics - going from a fringe movement to a significant impact at the polls in less than two years. Sky's @Chesh investigates Restore Britain campaigners' links to white nationalist and ethnonationalist views

Remember all the promises about AI? Almost every one of them was a lie. Here are the 11 biggest: 1. AI will create solo billionaire entrepreneurs. Lie. The smarter the models get, the less a product is worth, no matter how good the marketing is. Software is gradually becoming as ordinary as a cup of coffee from a coffee shop. And coffee shop owners don't become billionaires either. To get rich, you have to build something technically complex and unique. But AI models have strict filters that won't let you do any of that 2. People will make major scientific discoveries thanks to AI. Lie. AI labs will make scientific discoveries. For ordinary people, any serious scientific research is blocked by strict filters. Try discussing genetic engineering with Claude and you'll get your account banned right away 3. Engineers and programmers will be in higher demand as AI develops, because someone has to maintain it all. Lie. In two years, a software engineer will be on the same level as a barista selling coffee. The smarter the models get, the fewer people are needed to maintain systems. And this applies to more than just programmers 4. Thanks to AI, people will work less and rest more. Lie. If your employer used to expect five tasks a day from you, now they'll expect fifty. AI won't give you free time. It'll just raise the minimum bar for your productivity, especially when a large staff is no longer needed 5. AI will reduce economic inequality. Lie. The most powerful models require massive computing resources, capital, and infrastructure. The more important intelligence becomes to the economy, the more power goes to the handful of companies that control its production and distribution. We were promised democratization, and instead we got the groundwork for a new tech oligopoly 6. AI will let small companies compete with corporations. Lie. If one person with AI can build a product in a week, a corporation with a thousand employees and the same AI can build a thousand such products 7. AI will make us smarter. Lie. When people stop writing, analyzing, coding, and solving problems on their own, they risk gradually losing those skills. We're building the most powerful intellectual tool in history while gaining the option to completely stop training our own intelligence 8. AI will make technology accessible to everyone. Lie. You won't be given access to technology, but to rented intelligence. With limits, censorship, subscriptions, and rules that can change tomorrow. You control nothing 9. AI will give everyone a perfect education. Lie. We're already seeing serious degradation of human intelligence, of the education system, and of the need for a college degree. And nobody has yet figured out what to do with the hundreds of millions of students worldwide who, two years from now, will graduate with degrees nobody needs anymore. Intelligence has become free. Education is no longer needed 10. AI will kill advertising and pushy marketing. Lie. Advertisers used to buy a banner to influence your choice. Now they'll be able to pay your personal AI assistant, the one you trust more than your own wife. Advertising won't disappear. It'll become your best friend 11. AI will rid humanity of bureaucracy. Lie. One AI will draft the documents, a second will check them, a third will find violations, and a fourth will write appeals. Bureaucracy will finally be able to grow endlessly, without needing people at all

I’ve lost my country, that’s why I’ve joined Reform today

Orla hasn't defected, but she has seen the light. I think if you asked her, she'd say joining Restore was a terrible mistake. I know many of you dislike her, but I urge you to remember that we’re better than the vile Restore members who attacked her. She’d be better off supporting us and could be a very valuable asset. Remember, she knows where the bodies are buried.

Niemcy 🇩🇪 spuścili swoje 🐕 psy na Polskę🇵🇱

I’m voting for Restore Britain because I’m not scared of the British establishment 🖕 🇬🇧

Breaking News. Orla Minihane joins Reform again. Well. That wasnt predictable was it? In out in out you shake it all about. 🤣🤣 telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…

A Hampshire couple have been fined £600 and ordered to pay a further £6,000 in costs for allowing their 14-year-old son to work on the family's mobile food trailer. Dexter, their son, enjoys it and has a passion for it. That’s typical of the laws in this country. Encourage the work shy and penalise the hard working. As if the stress on this family weren’t enough the family said they were tackling the dispute with the council while supporting eldest son Oskar, 17, while he received treatment for blood cancer. @darrenpaffey @laboursatvir @carolinenokes Parents fined for employing teen son in food trailer bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8vg…

W pierwsym filmie Anna Korwin-Piotrowska – sędzia wspierana przez Tuska, która dziś wieczorem ogłosiła się przewodniczącą sądu – nakazuje pewnemu mężczyźnie wyjść, powołując się na artykuł 12 ust. 4. Mężczyzna odpowiada: „Wie pani dobrze, że wszyscy – nawet pani własni 1/3

Bad move from Jenrick. I understand the sentiment behind it, but such interventions can only be justified in relation to strategic national assets. A discount retailer isn't that. Once you start with this, where does it stop? Do we bail out every failing company if there's votes in it?

I was a volunteer for Reform before the GE 2024 when Reform were polling about 13%. At that time the volunteers and members who had stayed faithful to the Tory party were begging those, like myself, who had left the Tory Party to join Reform, to not "split the vote", then we were told "we couldn't really have ever been true Tories in the first place", we were warned "Nigel just wanted to punish the Tories and didn't care about the Country", "we would probably be lucky to get one seat", "Labour would destroy the Country and it would be our fault" and "we had to see sense and come back to the Tories, they were the only ones who could stop Labour" and on and on it went. A lot of us in Restore are ex-Reformers from those early days, a lot of us will remember the excitement we felt that night at the Count. We knew realistically we weren't going to win but remained hopeful we would win some seats and finally break the uni-party mould. We still felt on a high when Jonathon Reynolds, followed by Angela Rayner took to the stage, because we knew we had come a good second in an area where Labour had always had the vote. Would we have voted differently had we known how bad things were going to be, NO! We had left the Tories because we felt badly let down and we didn't trust them any more. So when Reform volunteers and members now plead with Restore volunteers and members to not split the vote, its like deja vu! Just like back then, there was a reason why we left the Tories, there is also a reason now! And even if Restore vanished tomorrow, just like if Reform had disappeared in 2024, we just simply wouldn't vote! Reform lost us! The trust has gone!