VOTE!!! Liberty - Love - Hope - Truth Liberty, NOT morality, should dictate Law. True Love is voluntary. Set goals. Gain knowledge. Christ is King!

Joined October 2024
Either: You believe that voting works, and you should go out and vote! ...or... You believe that voting doesn't work, and you should be marching on Washington. Don't want to march on Washington? Then GET OUT AND VOTE!! Hold your nose if you have to! VOTE!!
1
5
394
Please, let's just be friends
312
1,922
187
33,280
1,338,131
The Archivist retweeted
Following the latest disclosures from @DataRepublican, I see many conservative and right wing influencers saying that the way to defeat a Color Revolution is through public awareness. Color Revolutions don't depend on secrecy. It's a form of POPULAR revolution, meaning they need the masses on board. IT'S NO SECRET. Defeating secrecy helps us understand the threat, but that alone will NOT stop what's coming. Color Revolutions run on ORGANIZATION. It's not the secrecy that matters, it's the connective tissue of people, money, and strategy that force a decisive phase and tipping point. So it's the organization -- the act of getting individuals organized into groups that can be mobilized -- that you have to target. And you do that through counter-organization. REMEMBER: The crux of ALL revolutionary and counter-revolutionary strategy is to organize yourself and disorganize your opponents. The Viet Minh perfected this strategy with what they called Dau Tranh, or struggle or political struggle. It had three lines of effort, two of which are of supreme importance: Action among your own people. The total mobilization of propaganda, motivational, and organizational measures to build, organize, and sustain yourself. Action among the enemy’s people. The total propaganda effort to sow discontent, defeatism, dissent, and disloyalty among the enemy’s population. Organize yourself and disorganize your opponents. That's the strategy to win. That's how you defeat an organized effort to topple a government. The side that is better organized and wins greater support is going to win. Next Tuesday night, I will livestream and hold a Spaces here to discuss this in greater detail and provide a path to defeating this burgeoning Color Revolution movement. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.
234
2,143
115
8,370
316,683
They're right. Malfoid is, actually, the perfect example of how much damage pornography can do to men. And women.
56
187
46
1,554
176,327
The Archivist retweeted
This is a public service announcement for all women everywhere ever. A fight does not happen by mutual consent. A fight happens because one person decides to start it. That's ONE. Uno. Un. Eins. Ichi. Yī. Unus. Ett. Hana. Wāḥid. One is not two. Your man is not in a fight because he looked at the other guy, and they both said, hey, let's totally throw down, bro, as if fighting were a pickup game of basketball. Your man is in a fight because one person decided to attack. That person is not necessarily your man even if, and I cannot stress this enough, even if your man is the one who throws hands first. Yes, you read that right. If you don't understand, if it makes no sense to you, that's because you know nothing about fighting. If you grab your man and try to restrain him, you are not preventing the fight. You are restraining him while the fight occurs. Just because you would like your man to exit the situation does not necessarily mean he can. Even if he can, that does not necessarily mean he should. He knows about fighting. Some men know less about it, and some men know more, but unless you are Ronda Rousey or Lena Miculek, your man always knows more about fighting than you. If you have something you want him to do, like exit the situation if he can, use your words like a big girl. Do not touch him. He will ignore you, of course, because you have no idea what you are talking about, but you can talk if it makes you happy. Do not touch him. Step back from the area of conflict and get out of the way. Keep him between you and the threat if possible. Do not get between him and the threat. That is retarded. Also do not touch him. If you do touch him, do not be surprised if you shoves you hard enough to land you on your butt ten feet away. This is the appropriate response. He is trying to protect himself and you from your willful ignorance. Do not touch him. If you do touch him, and he survives, do not be surprised if he ends the relationship afterwards. You grossly disrespected his judgement, and put him in serious danger with your selfish desire to be right all the time. Do not touch him. The time to have a conversation about whether the fight should have happened is after the fight, not while people are in danger. Do not touch him. Okay, quick reading comprehension test. What should you not do?
A 68 year old man who was taking an evening walk with his wife got attacked by a young homeless dude but the old man put him to sleep with just 3 hot punch
318
1,397
102
15,429
522,766
I just came across this in an Open Society Foundations document about how to fix public “mistrust” of liberal "democracy," and I honestly feel sick reading it. I've read many alarming quotes, but few are so "mask off" like this. "I believe the time has come for a responsible, courageous elite, those who care far more about addressing the genuine social problems than about election results. Only a political elite with vision, prudence and a focus on the general good—to whom the electorate… can cede part of their sovereignty in the elections—will be able to justify public trust and spearhead... our struggle to survive."" Read that again. The proposed solution to the public's distrust in democracy... is less democracy. An unelected "elite" to whom the public should cede sovereignty. Abolish democracy to save democracy. This kind of thinking is what we're up against.
1,795
15,440
1,015
34,575
894,615
The Archivist retweeted
>junior dev at a mid startup >wednesday morning >just want to push a minor bugfix to our php app today >open laptop, check slack >company group chat is an absolute warzone >CTO typing in all caps about php2shell >fucking php >whatever, server hasn't blown up yet, I just need to get my code in >open gitlab to merge the PR >forced emergency logout because of a critical gitlab security patch release >fucking gitlab >pipeline fails because of some weird regex compiler bug >spend 40 minutes fighting CI/CD >i can just use AI to help debug >fire up opencode >api keys nuked because they were breached >fucking opencode >i’ll just get fresh LLM api keys from our corp proxy, LiteLLM >it won’t connect? It’s down? >look up LiteLLM news: supply chain compromise >fucking litellm >cold sweat forming >slack alert: db connection error >check our database connection >we host on TiDB Cloud >they just announced a security breach, unauthorized access via stolen service account credentials, data copied >fucking tidb cloud >full panic attack incoming >figure fuck it, just ship the container to Railway and go home >open Railway dashboard >bright red banner: "Security Disclosure: Rotate all environment variables immediately. All builds paused." >fucking railway >try to open the app URL in browser to see if anything is even working ⁠>NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID⁠ >eMudhra intermediate certificates compromised >4 >instantly untrusted by every major browser >fucking emudhra >stare blankly at mac screen for 10min >random pop-up >restarting in 10min to fix a critical vulnerability >fucking macos >close laptop >leave office >never come back
127
959
79
11,034
317,925
Security called me at 6:12 AM today. "Patch every PHP server immediately." I asked what happened. "Two critical vulnerabilities. Remote code execution. No authentication required." Cool. How many PHP servers do we have? According to inventory: 12 According to reality: Nobody knows. We found one running WordPress. Three running old internal tools. One under someone's desk. Two inside vendor appliances. A forgotten employee directory from 2016. And a server named: PHP-OLD-DO-NOT-TOUCH Naturally, that one runs payroll exports. Then we found a PHP 5.6 box. I asked who owned it. The documentation said: BRIAN. Brian left in 2019. We called Brian. He said: "Oh wow, that's still running?" Excellent. By 8 AM, leadership joined the incident call. CEO: "Can hackers actually get in?" Security: "Potentially yes." CEO: "Without a password?" Security: "Yes." CEO: "Then why do WE need passwords?" Not the lesson. Finance asked if we could wait until the weekend to patch because downtime affects revenue. Security explained that the alternative was letting strangers execute code on our servers. Finance asked for a cost comparison. At 9:17, someone suggested temporarily taking the vulnerable websites offline. Marketing refused. "Our campaign is live." So for the next hour, the company officially decided maintaining a landing page for 20% off webinar registration was more important than preventing remote server takeover. We finally patched everything we could find. Then our scanner discovered another PHP server. Hostname: TEMP-PHP-2014 Uptime: 4,512 days. Nobody knows what it does. Nobody owns it. Nobody can shut it down. But every time we block network access, the warehouse stops printing shipping labels. Security has classified it as critical infrastructure. It is running PHP 5.4. The vulnerability has existed longer than half our employees. The emergency patch took four hours. Finding out what PHP actually runs took eleven. The internet isn't held together with code. It's held together with servers everyone is afraid to turn off.
920
7,075
1,159
58,013
3,835,105
The Archivist retweeted
So if a communist wins an election with the platform of destroying the U.S. Constitution, how do they take the oath of office swearing to defend it? Will they just say the magic words and suddenly… not be communist? You all see the problem, right?
296
772
36
4,249
37,670
Go forth and open-source every IoT device in your house. Dump their comms. See what they're sending home. God speed.
21
512
13
6,091
97,738
The fact that we have both a PHP exploit AND a certificate authority compromise at the same time should be utterly terrifying. For the next several hours to days: Almost the entire internet can be undetectably hacked unless both server owners AND customers update immediately.
2
191
"Europe will be destroyed by women who project onto those animals the motherhood that belonged to the children they aborted."
A Europa será destruída por mulheres que projetam naqueles animais a maternidade que cabia aos filhos que elas abortaram.
292
8,114
155
78,973
778,678
The Archivist retweeted
President Donald J. Trump announces the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program: "All Americans will now be able to go to the fraud.gov and report cases of corruption and theft of taxpayer dollars in their communities... If you turn somebody in and you let's say report and find $1 billion, we are giving a commission to that person of 1%. That's a lot of money."
1,702
2,834
278
13,630
411,335
The Archivist retweeted
This seditionist plot that @DataRepublican has uncovered and documented with ironclad proof is potentially the biggest political news story of any of our lifetimes, and the legacy media is completely incurious about it. Worse, the Washington Post is running front page top cover for the plotters' nefarious scheme. You think you hate journalists enough....
602
7,853
154
27,740
216,268
You need to understand how Right-wing people under 40 view the Left. When we think of Leftists, we do not think of Barack Obama or Ezra Klein. Yes, these guys are on the Left, but younger Millennials and Zoomers on the Right do not think of Leftists in their own age bracket as polished technocrats. These are not the sort of people that make up our Left-wing counterparts that we grew up with, went to school with, or work with. When we think of Leftists, the first thing that pops into our head are a bunch of disgusting, depraved, spiteful mutants who want to destroy everything around them as payback for the crime of being born. We think of Discord troons that invaded our hobbies, Reddit mods who are drunk on the most insignificant power imaginable, that one girl from high school or college who became a literal Communist, and that friend or family member who cut off all contact because we refused to treat their mental illness like a status symbol. We think of people who, if they ever became a majority of the country and actually managed to possess political power, would inevitably kill tens of millions of people out of blind envy and petty cruelty. Younger people on the Right come across as impatient and anxious in their mindset and mannerisms because they understand what will eventually happen when these people succeed their Gen X and Boomer predecessors in the Democratic Party. They know what is to come if their own generational cohorts on the Left actually take power, and they feel incredibly exasperated that it seems like none of their parents or grandparents understand just how late the hour truly is.
807
4,378
305
34,242
1,489,338
The Archivist retweeted
Congratulations to the self-appointed guardians of democracy on their latest alleged masterstroke: win an election, provoke the president into a constitutional confrontation, then declare his government illegitimate for responding. Absolutely fucking brilliant. Somebody give these people a Nobel Prize in manufactured emergencies. The alleged roadmap that @DataRepublican has found begins with Democrats sweeping the 2026 midterms. DSA activists then become the "foot soldiers" in sustained confrontations with Trump's administration, pushing toward a "doomsday scenario" involving the Insurrection Act, potentially in 2027. And here's where the No Kings crowd deserves a standing ovation for sheer, breathtaking hypocrisy. The president exercises constitutional authority during the confrontation they've allegedly been working to provoke. Suddenly, Washington loses legitimacy, Democratic governors become alternative political authorities, and the 2028 election becomes a referendum on whether America's existing governing structure should survive. What an extraordinary fucking coincidence. The movement screaming about kings is accused of preparing to exploit presidential power to advance a political transformation that includes proposals to abolish the Senate. Apparently, democracy is sacred right up until its institutions become inconvenient. The allegations also identify United Democracy Alliance as a coordinating force behind No Kings, Indivisible, and 50501. Roughly 7,000 documents, thousands of transcripts, and hundreds of recordings reportedly support the investigation. Those records still need to establish whether this astonishingly cynical operation was actually planned. Because if they do, the implications are absolutely damning. Imagine the arrogance required to deliberately provoke a constitutional crisis, exploit the government's response, and then present yourself as the heroic defender of the very republic you've been working to destabilize. And imagine the contempt for ordinary Americans required to expect them to swallow that steaming pile of bullshit. The No Kings crowd allegedly has a fascinating new theory of democratic government: when the voters and Constitution won't deliver your revolution, manufacture a fucking emergency and call yourself the rescue squad. (article below)
124
1,168
63
3,492
75,174
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨 Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution. Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren't working alone. The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T. R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major "blocking" NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that. R2T's role within UDA is concerned with "the day after tomorrow" - in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons "Big Tent" initiative. Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the "illegal orders" messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A. It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself - especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth. You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to. Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants. As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of "redlines" in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against "peaceful" protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them. Important to understand: The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.
2,610
19,212
2,510
42,579
3,156,098
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 1: THE PLAN 🚨 I am working on gathering all the documents. Now, here's something to understand about the "democracy" and protest ecosystem: almost nobody knows the 'grand plan' so to speak. They simply agree to play a role. For example, 99% of people breaking stuff on the streets believe they're doing it out of an organic uprising. They don't see that the police have been ordered to stand down. They don't see that legal services have already been arranged for them. They don't see that foundations are paying for their bonds. Similarly here, governors aren't participating in a pact to destroy the Constitution. Governors simply have agreed to push back on the Insurrection Act. The effect is the same: the governors end up playing a role in a grander plan. I call this "shared epistemology" in my book Unelected. Motivations differ, people rarely agree to the big evil supervillain framing, but incentives all converge in the same end goal. No Kings might not agree to explicitly tear down the Constitution, but they nonetheless work with DSA and will turn out millions of people if the right phone call is put in. Here is one articulation of the plan - and crucially, since then, they have put many NGOs in their places to execute their proper role at all levels when the time is right. Many more coming.
1,175
13,281
1,120
29,473
870,532
The Archivist retweeted
This guy embodies one of the most popular archetypes used to bully white men throughout the world. Yet after being attacked, he gets back up, stands his ground, and faces his attackers to defend whatever remains of his store. His attackers, meanwhile, behave like a pack of hyenas. Whatever bravery they have is only because of their numbers and their de facto anonymity — police wouldn’t arrest them anyway. So, the guy who looks like the punchline of a thousand jokes actually displays more honor in a single moment than literally the entire recorded history of his attackers. He has no crowd to hide behind, no numerical advantage, and seemingly very little left to protect. What has happened to him will either be ignored or excused as having been caused by some kind of socio-economic problem which is ultimately his fault anyway. Nevertheless, he stands there. I would take one thousand Jacques Blacks before taking a single refugee.
722
6,028
325
67,663
1,306,372
The past few days, I got my hands on thousands of new transcripts and hundreds of recordings, thanks to leads from @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan . You've heard that the DSA is proposing structural reforms to America, including abolishing the Senate and imposing term limits. What you not have heard is - there is an operational plan to put it all into action. If the Democratic Party sweeps 2026, then DSA will become "foot soldiers" in constant clashes with the administration to cross a "red line" or invoke a "doomsday scenario" - meaning, President Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, probably sometime in 2027. Then, a lot of coordinated responses kick off, including delegitimizing the federal government itself and handing that legitimacy to Democratic governors. 2028 then becomes a vote on whether to keep America governance as-is or to burn it all down to appease a "young and brown" demographic. The mysterious group who's been coordinating 50501, Indivisible, and coordinating the NoKings protests is called "United Democracy Alliance" and their intellectual leader is Erica Chenoweth who came up with the 3.5% rule of nonviolent regime change. Patience. I know I've hyped this more than anything else. It's genuinely the biggest discovery I've had. This is an enormous archive. This is only the beginning.
2,231
21,857
2,923
46,534
2,262,665
I'm leaning more and more toward FOSS/FOSH revolution these days, especially with the recent progress in AI and how people are using it. The age of fully open-source, fully custom, software and hardware is upon us. And open-source AI models will also soon be so good that we won't even need access to the private premium models for anything except the most demanding workloads. The biggest bottleneck is going to be the hardware. That's the next big economic battlefield.
Looking at where technology is going these days, I'm thinking there are only two possible outcomes over the next 5 years. 1 - The entire tech industry collapses and people hold onto their old tech long enough for new companies to replace the old ones. 2 - FOSS/FOSH revolution.
2
93