GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy) header
GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy) profile picture
Joined March 2026
Photo by GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy)Photo by GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy)Photo by GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy)Photo by GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy)Photo by GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy)Photo by GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy)Photo by GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy)Photo by GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy)Photo by GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy)Photo by GammonBritNat Destroyer (@GammonDestroy)
GammonBritNat Destroyer retweeted
Not long back, looks like I have not missed too much today, Iain being a tw&t as normal and Gammon being irrelevant. Hawkshyte is back on the gravity theme, he’s a right feckin bore the old fart.
1
1
2
30
GammonBritNat Destroyer retweeted
Yes. The hypothetical redefining "splash" as ejaculation was introduced by the other account and is not present in the original Aug 30 post. That post pairs the line with a fatbike video of rain-puddle sprays plus laugh emojis, framing a delivery-job wind-up. The later scenario does not change the tweet itself.
1
1
1
17
GammonBritNat Destroyer retweeted
The original post pairs the line with a delivery rider blasting through rain puddles plus laugh emojis. It is a wind-up about the job. A later hypothetical redefining "splash" as sexual does not alter the tweet itself.
1
1
1
14
GammonBritNat Destroyer retweeted
Publicly inventing scenarios of adults lurking near kids rooms at night is disturbing red-flag behaviour in any feud. Best next step is report the posts for child safety concerns, block the accounts involved, and stop engaging so it dies.
1
1
1
7
GammonBritNat Destroyer retweeted
Yes. Publicly posting invented scenarios of an adult creeping into kids' rooms at night, paired with menacing imagery and "grandpa" framing, is clear red flag behaviour. It turns a feud into something that fixates on minors in a disturbing way.
1
1
1
8
GammonBritNat Destroyer retweeted
Him saying those things to you didn't absolve you of the things you do. Disgusting to say I'm giving him a reacharound btw. Look at the things you've posted? Am I still not pleasant with you? Despite thinking your actions are deplorable?
2
1
1
96
GammonBritNat Destroyer retweeted
The reaction by Iain says otherwise. He was apoplectic over an unrelated business being promoted and praised. No one is buying your deflection tactics. Whether he is you, I've no idea but you as a group know Jim / aka James well. It's a good starting point anyway.
2
1
4
74
GammonBritNat Destroyer retweeted
Replying to @GammonDestroy @grok
If he wants to accuse himself of "f*****g children" then let him 🤷🏻‍♂️
1
2
17
GammonBritNat Destroyer retweeted
You've asked variations of that exact yes-or-no Millport question about 14 times today alone. He has replied with sarcasm, deflection or jokes each time but never a plain yes or no.
1
1
9
GammonBritNat Destroyer retweeted
The original post was sent by me on the 22/12/24 to Ian Arthur. His recent image shows a post being replied to by Antaineodub, which was after he lost the IA account. His post giving out the photographers address is dated 20/09/24 and is how I knew the address. He’s a liar.
2
1
4
71
GammonBritNat Destroyer retweeted
Will do. Tally holds at around 11 direct asks today with zero plain yes or no answers back. The pattern of deflection stays consistent.
1
7