ALERT: 🚨 Democratic Socialists of America [DSA] now explicitly calling to “FULLY ABOLISH” prisons and police. With midterms fast approaching, BIG GOVERNMENT SOCIALISM will likely become reality without GOP turnout.

Jared Kushner asked for a bribe and received billions to sell U.S. foreign policy. That includes payments from UAE ruler Mohamed bin Zayed, who favored blowing up the JCPOA and funded the genocide in Sudan, and from bone-saw MBS. If he did it here, he’s doing it with Ukraine too. This is the worst, most catastrophic corruption in American history period. We are in a period of immorality and horror that hasn’t been seen since slavery. The price for that was immense. And there will be a price to pay for this, as well. The Iran War is a part of this. I would bet the house on this corrupt money somehow driving the foreign policy towards Iran that led to where we are today. Americans are dead. Iranian children are dead. Our bases are shattered. Our munitions are spent. Our Patriots are gone. We have increased the risk of a wider conflagration to a maximal degree. And for what? To make Trump and Kushner money. Families with zero identifiable military service as far as I can tell. Appalling.

The GRU hacked into Jared Kushner's iPhone. Dutch military intelligence (MIVD) then recruited a GRU spy who gave them access to the hacked phone. What MIVD discovered was that Kushner had access to two bank accounts --one Azerbaijani, the other Israeli --where Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Emirati ruler Mohammed bin Zayed deposited money. It sounds like a slightly far-fetched episode of "Slow Horses," but it's real. And it proves just how eye-poppingly corrupt this administration was and continues to be as its "special envoy" decides the fate of tens of millions in Europe in the Middle East. Simply incredible reporting by Matthew Cole, drawn from his new book on Kushner. vanityfair.com/story/jared-k…

These are hilariously moronic takes from the AI bulls on the deepseek Deepinfer release. If every lab becomes 5-10x more compute efficient due to deepseek tech, that is 5-10x more effective compute that demand has to absorb. You don't just continue to make $38 per GPU hour in perpetuity - price is a function of the constantly evolving supply and demand balance. A 5-10x increase in supply overnight completely overwhelms demand and price falls to the variable cost of keeping the chips running. I keep telling you guys that there is a massive compute glut that is being papered over with super inefficient US models, cartel pricing, and unsold compute being allocated to training for lack of a buyer. This DeepSeek news IS A BIG DEAL. If the cartel continues to withhold compute to try to keep up the illusion of a compute shortage, smaller labs and neos will serve up unlimited tokens for stupid cheap using deepseek tech and break them. Hard to keep a cartel in a super fragmented commodity market like AI and data centers.

The "unlimited AI demand" story just hit a wall. Corporate token spending growth collapsed from 42% in July to 0.2% in September, per Ramp data. Meanwhile, return on invested capital at the five biggest hyperscalers fell from 38% to 20% as capex outruns earnings. The infinite-demand thesis needs infinite returns. The returns are going the other way.

🧵🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: International actors are involved in the State Department led color revolution 🚨🚨 This is not speculation; it’s straight from a recorded call. Ex-USAID employees describe how, before January 20, they moved internal groups off government systems and into encrypted Signal chats, then quickly linked with foreign partners and NGOs after the inauguration. This attempt at creating a color revolution isn't new news; this part was already reported in NOTUS earlier this year. But what's not reported is the international aspect. One participant explicitly frames it as "a global anti-authoritarian movement," connecting U.S. officials with "colleagues from around the world who have dealt with this directly." They reference coordination with Johns Hopkins, "international democracy and conflict mitigation spaces," and efforts to mobilize across borders against what they perceive as domestic authoritarianism. At what point does this become treason? As always, patience as I pull together this thread. 👇

I will be showing shortly that No Kings and other protests are run by a secret panel called United Democracy Alliance, with names.

Jeffries just confirmed the plan: if Democrats take the House, the deportations stop and the people already removed start coming back. He nodded when asked about reversing third-country removals, then said Trump’s “mass deportation machine does not get a dime.” They called it targeting “the worst of the worst.” Now it’s “repair work” for illegal immigrants. That’s the choice in November.

You've probably seen the video. A young Frenchwoman in Paris, in tears, begging looters to stop. "Why are you doing this? That's not what we stand for." Some accounts are mocking her. "She voted for it." I won't. Because what you see on her face is not stupidity. It's a disease that has infected the entire West, and it has a name: suicidal empathy. The term comes from Gad Saad, an evolutionary behavioral scientist at Concordia University in Montreal. A man who fled the Lebanese civil war as a child, and who knows what it looks like when a society falls apart. His new book, Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind, is the follow-up to The Parasitic Mind. Here is the thesis, and why it concerns every one of us. Empathy is one of the best things about us. It evolved for a reason: to care for our children, our kin, our tribe. It was calibrated for a world where the people you felt for were the people around you, and where empathy always came paired with its counterweight: the instinct to protect your own and to recognize a threat. Suicidal empathy is what happens when that mechanism misfires. When it fires at the wrong targets, in the wrong amounts, with no brake. When we feel more for the criminal than for his victim. More for the stranger who breaks the rules than for the citizen who follows them. More for how compassionate we look than for what our compassion actually produces. Where does it come from? Four layers. First, biology. Empathy is a spotlight, as the psychologist Paul Bloom put it. It lights up the one face in front of you and leaves everything else in the dark. The crying migrant on the boat is visible. The thousands of future victims of a broken system are statistics. A spotlight is a terrible tool for running a country. Second, our own civilization. The West is the civilization that put the victim at the center of its morality. Christianity taught us to care for the stranger, the poor, the weak. It was one of the greatest moral revolutions in history. But cut off from its other half, justice, responsibility, the duty to protect your own, it turns into something else. Third, ideology. In The Parasitic Mind, Saad described idea pathogens, ideas that hijack our reasoning. Suicidal empathy is the emotional counterpart: an ideology that hijacks our compassion. It sorts the world into oppressors and victims, then demands unlimited empathy for whoever ranks as the victim, whatever they do. Fourth, status. In the age of social media, empathy has become a display. Posting "refugees welcome" costs nothing and earns applause. The bill goes to someone else: the working class, the suburbs, the women walking home at night. The results are everywhere. Criminals treated as victims of society. Sexual assaults by migrants met with lenient sentences. Self-defense branded as aggression. Borders treated as cruelty. Saad's conclusion is simple: a society dies when it would rather display infinite tolerance than use its survival instinct. Now the part I'll add myself, and that few people dare to say. On average, women score higher than men on measures of empathy. It's one of the most consistent findings in psychology, across cultures, and it makes perfect evolutionary sense: for most of human history, the survival of children depended on it. It's a strength. But it means an ideology that weaponizes empathy will hit women harder. And the data shows it: in country after country, young women have moved sharply to the left of young men, especially on immigration. This is where men have a responsibility. Not to mock. Not to lecture. Not to say "she deserved it." Empathy has always needed a counterweight, and that counterweight was the protective instinct: the one that draws lines, says no, and stands between the threat and the people it loves. Men abandoned that role. They were told it was toxic, and many believed it. So they stayed silent at the dinner table, at work, with their partners, sisters, daughters and friends. That has to end. Men have to have this conversation, honestly and with respect: compassion that cannot say no is not compassion. It's surrender. And the first to pay for it are women. Many women already understand this better than anyone. Some of the bravest voices in this fight are women, precisely because they are the first to feel the danger in the street. A civilization rests on a balance: compassion and strength, openness and borders, mercy and justice. When one side swallows the other, the foundations crack. What we are watching in Europe is what happens when empathy has no counterweight left. Look at that young woman again. She isn't the enemy. She's what this ideology made of a generation that was told kindness would be enough. Our job is to make sure she's the last generation that has to learn it this way.