My ultimate conclusion while studying the history of the 3rd Reich intensely for many years is that Christianity was one of the main, if not main, synthesizing agents that made 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐚𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐦 work on a cultural and social level. Adolf Hitler lays this out plainly in his book in the chapter entitled "Vienna Days": "Had the Christian-Socialist party, apart from its shrewd estimate of the value of the broad masses, also gauged correctly the importance of the racial problem (which was properly grasped by the Pan-German movement) and had this party been really nationalist, or if the Pan-German leaders, on the other hand, in addition to their correct handling of the Jewish problem and of the national idea, had adopted the practical standpoint of the Christian-Socialist Party, and particularly their attitude towards Socialism—then a movement would have developed which, in my opinion, might even at that time have successfully altered the course of German history." - Volume 1 Chapter 2 p137/138 in the Stalag edition. There is no secret mystical esoteric sauce to the formula. Christian Socialism, + particularist Nationalism = National Socialism. Adapting it to every White nation is merely a question of patriotism. Our enemy knows everything I know and they will do anything to prevent a sequel. > They will create fabricated "heroes" who speak passionately about "nazism", even start wars with them. > They will pay fake "Christians" to push a twisted liberal world view which will damn your eternal soul. > They will promulgate hoaxes sources and misinformation as the truth. > They will flood the internet with stereotypes and myths while they re-write history in real time. > They will communicate talking points to mainstream politicians to deride the virtue of White Nationalism (Which is Christian Nationalism). They will do everything in their power to slow us down. I will do everything I can to wake up the broad masses to this truth. Anyone who stands in my way or derides this truth is my enemy. There can be no tolerance or unity until the message is clear and every White man echoes it in his soul.

Looks like the new animated film Wildwood has Nignog Pacific northwest "vikings" to check all the subversive boxes. The character is Brendan, the Bandit King (voiced by Mahershala Ali). Tell me (((Hollywood))) isn't trying to push paganism. 🤣🤣🤣

My honest feelings about Samuel Sey summed up in a classic American song.

If Israel is still embodied in a physical people, why did Jesus say "My Kingdom is not of this world?" Nobody gets a pass. Nobody is special. Everyone is a sinner.

I don't seek out arguments with CI folks, but when they attack other White Christians and refuse to back down I'll correct them. I also don't recognize the cult of Christogenea as the final word on CI. Serpent Seed is not Classic British Israelism anyway. Anyone who denies the Holy Spirit is not a Christian and is in a state of unforgivable sin who is leading others astray. The destruction of Israel was recorded in the Old Testament. Nothing about that has Changed and never will change. Jeremiah was a prophet who was looking forward to a future restoration of Israel. Everything he is discussing is the New Covenant created through the Cross which is not a physical place or people. Though Jeremiah uses strong language about a continued Israel, Jesus is the King of Israel and the Son of man and changed the deal because it is within his authority to do. You can see that in Matthew 21:43: Matthew 21:43 - “The kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits.” You can read this in all his parables, and in cursing of the Fig tree. Jesus main mission was to defeat sin and death, but he also came to create something New. A new wine Skin where the old could not fit. This cannot be changed or wrestled with. Romans 9:6 - "But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel" Galatians 3:7 - "Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham." Galatians 3:29 - “And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.” Hebrews 8:13 - "By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear." There is only one Covenant active: The Cross. Jesus inducts the Apostles into this covenant with the first Communion. Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, John Chrysostom, Augustine, Martin Luther, John Calvin, Philip Melanchthon, Heinrich Bullinger, John Owen ect all agree on this: Promises made to Israel were transferred to the Church. Ethnic Israel no longer had a distinct ongoing covenant claim. Martin Luther said: "The Jews are no longer Israel, for all things are to be new, and Israel must become new. Those alone are the true Israel who have accepted the new covenant, which was established and begun at Jerusalem. Thus all the Gentiles who are Christians are the true Israelites." Marin Luther also said: "Listen, Jew, are you aware that Jerusalem and your sovereignty, together with your temple and priesthood, have been destroyed for over 1,460 years? … Therefore this work of wrath is proof that the Jews, surely rejected by God, are no longer his people, and neither is he any longer their God.” John Calvin said about Jeremiah: “If removed shall these laws be from my presence, the seed of Israel shall also fail; that is, ‘As certain as is the stability of the order of nature, seen in the course of the sun and the moon, and in the turbulent sea, so certain will be the deliverance of my Church, nor can it ever be destroyed.’ … There is, therefore, no reason to fear that the safety of the Church should ever fail, for the laws or decrees of nature shall never cease; that is, God, who has from the beginning governed the world, will not disregard the welfare of his Church, for whose sake the world has been created.” Swapping out 1850 years of European Replacement theology for Serpent Seed isn't going to happen for me because it's just not in the text. If you can't take a Hint and back off I will put you in your place, And probably block you because you're annoying and a waste of my time. I'm completely open to the historical and anthropological reality that the Hebrew Israelites had European DNA, and even fled into Europe, but I'm not changing the bible for William M. Branham (1960s) anymore than I would change it for a Zionist or a liberal.

This kind of thinking assumes that Capitalism is the yardstick for what is left and right. This is fundamentally wrong if anyone is at all honest with themselves about the reality of geopolitics. What makes one left or right at the highest dividing line is Nationalism VS Globalism. Why? Because economic plans are just tools. This is why modern day China may call itself culturally communist but they are not in practice far left in the way they deal with the world. They are imperialists economically. Brivael Le Pogam is using a cold war paradigm of Capitalism vs Communism, when both economic models are essentially designed to keep an ultra elite rich and ignore National boundaries. 1. Le Pogam's initial statement is completely false. The nationalization of trust is mentioned but "The abolition of big business" is not to be found in the document. > Point 13 regarded nationalizing businesses which had been incorporated. > Point 14 wanted to share profits rather than dismantling the businesses (Which would be true wealth redistribution in a left wing model). > Point 11 was about breaking DEBT slavery (Or in the German Interest slavery) which is what capitalism encourages. Point 18 Clarifies: "We demand ruthless battle against those whose activities are injurious to the common interest. Common criminals against the nation, usurers, profiteers, etc., must be punished with death, whatever their creed or race." Unearned income had to do with the Christian concept of Usury, not wealth redistribution in the conventional far left sense of the word that would be employed by globalist communists. 2. Le Pogam's very next statement mentions the "expropriation of land" but Hitler clarified this later and said it was not aimed at landed aristocrats or conservatives. His clarification on April 13, 1928, was thus: A. Hitler emphasized that the NSDAP supported private property. B. Scope of Expropriation: He clarified that expropriation without compensation would only apply legally to land that was illegally acquired or not administered from the viewpoint of the national welfare. (In America we will need to do this with foreigners who have bought up our land) C. He explicitly stated the measure was directed primarily against "Jewish land-speculation companies" rather than German peasant smallholdings or legitimate agricultural landowners. "The common God Before The Individual Good" was in point 24, which was a statement about Christian Socialism. Hitler bluntly admits in MK that National Socialism is a fusion of Prussian Nationalism and Christian socialism. It meant that the Germans, be they rich or poor, should contribute to society and help each other. (The rest of the statement is an affirmation of a Christian moral basis and a freedom of religion for Christians). So his basic theory is just a moving of a yardstick and a fundamental misunderstanding of what makes one left or right. Continued: