Ahh. The Orange Man is back. Purgatory site becomes hell site again.
I'm off.
Been nice knowing y'all.
Graeme Orr
7
8
The Free Speech Lord of Twitter is blocking people seeing replies to tweets lampooning him.
#SelfLampoon
1
be reassured, plucky Brits and others will resurrect an All Talents squadron on WW2 era aircraft, to repel them. 2/3
@CommandoComic has:
(a) gone sci-fi ?
(b) realised WW2 was closer to Battle of Gettysburg than today ?
(c) discovered threat of MNC hyper- capitalism ?
1
Graeme Orr retweeted
WC.
Bathroom.
John.
Loo.
Head.
Wash room.
Throne room.
Lavatory.
Latrine.
Bog.
Privy.
Restroom.
Dunny.
El Baño.
Commode.
Outhouse.
Can.
Life saver.
Call it what you want...
But for refugees having access to a toilet can save their life.
#WorldToiletDay
That Sarah Palin hasn't been declared toast in Alaska congressional district suggests that US media, parties are still newbies at (optional) preferential voting.
And that with long and machine read ballots, scrutineering for preferences isn't a thing. @rickhasen
"Pedo Guy" thinks he's Jack Ma.
(Does US not have WH&S laws?!)
politico.eu/article/must-tel…
1
Unions NSW (No 3, divided in 2).
In what is left of this challenge to parts of the NSW Electoral Funding Act ... the Court has reserved judgment over whether a $20 000 cap on lobby groups campaigning at State by-elections, is constitutional. 1/3
austlii.edu.au/au/other/HCAT…
1
NSW counters the $20k cap is more than trad by-election campaigns by lobby groups. More broadly, that parliament didn't just pull figure from its a**e
And that parties are accountable in ways lobbies are not
FWIW
Under ECHR treaty, UK court upheld £5 limit!
HCA is more liberal
2
The UK prosecution + law was undone by Euro Ct of Human Rights, but not without significant dissent
UK Parliament simply raised the limit to £500
That remains the most a lobbyist can spend 'promoting' a candidate, similar to NSW 'electoral' matter cap
hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%2…
2
(The UK decision was reversed by the Euro Ct of Human Rights, but not without significant dissent.
hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%2… )












