Pinned Tweet
AI is not the problem. Illusions about web security are.
Credentials - access and authority, two distinct things that on the web are almost always dangerously conflated - are data strings that the web as you know it, the browsers you work in and the npm dependent tools you engage with all expose.
Binance was not the last, nor will it be the biggest - it was the dinner bell being rung. Ignore the AI frontier company - Anthropic, OpenAI, X - calls for regulation, that is pure protectionism. The facts do not support their claims.
This is the full report in the comments. Almost 7 months and nearly 600 hours of research and careful writing to provide you with the only definitive account ever written.
🤖 Made with AI
If it wasn’t already obvious, here are the facts that end the myth. Unless of course, you are a socialist in which case it’s just hate speech (aka facts) that newspeak should make illegal.
🇮🇪 Ireland
Kneecap British Establishment funded controlled opposition.
Puppets ordered to divide & distract all while posing as Irish patriots.
Now drowning in multiple rape & sexual assault allegations.
Kneecap’s State Funding,
The Financial Footprint (Est. £7.8M+ Total)
Below is a detailed breakdown of government and state-regulated investments in the Kneecap brand,
UK Government (DCMS/BFI)
• Initial Film Production Grant: £575,000
• Production “Top-up” Grant: £200,000
• Global Marketing & Advertising: £60,000
• Staffing/Crew Diversity Grant: £35,000
• US Sundance Festival Debut: Approx. £10,000
• Automatic UK State Rebate (AVEC): Est. £600,000
UK Government (Dept. for Business)
• “King’s Stash” Lawsuit Settlement: £14,250
• Taxpayer-paid Legal Costs: Est. £50,000
NI Government (Dept. for Economy/Communities)
• Core Film Production Support (NI Screen): £805,000
• Music/Momentum Touring Grants (Arts Council): Est. £15,000
Republic of Ireland Government
• ROI Production Funding (Screen Ireland): Est. £333,000
• Automatic ROI State Rebate (Section 481): Est. £500,000
• Irish Language Broadcast Fund (TG4): Est. £125,000
• Travel Grant (Culture Ireland): Approx. £5,000
State-Regulated Marketplace
• Sony Pictures Classics (Global Rights): Est. £1,500,000
• Commercial Market Ad Spend/Promotion: Est. £1,000,000
• Domestic Distribution & PR: Est. £1,000,000
• Unallocated Auxiliary Grants & Global Distribution: £972,750
Video Credit - @BROKENBRITAIN0
104
I have been looking forward to this for a while. As I said when @AllisonPearson tweeted about this, I imagined it was a rather one sided debate as @RaymondIbrahim5 is perhaps the best informed voice I have heard on all of this. With that said, @MaajidNawaz is no fool.
At long last, my much anticipated debate with Maajid Nawaz, hosted by Winston Marshall, is out. Look forward to reading your thoughts on it:
youtu.be/FvhrhnI6M3M
1
97
Greg Chew 🇮🇪🏴🇨🇭 retweeted
Patrick Christys explains what is really going on… they are taking us us all for mugs 🤬
Greg Chew 🇮🇪🏴🇨🇭 retweeted
This isn't about slavery at all
If it was, these campaigners would be fighting for the millions of Africans in MODERN slavery
This is a cash grab by the Caribbean and an attack on Britain & The West by activists
No one today is a victim of Britain's slave trade
Absolutely hilarious to see @MayorofLondon utterly ridiculed and exposed for lying, duplicitous Islamist that he is.
This Islamophobia Awareness Month, we must shine a light on the abhorrent hatred and discrimination Muslims continue to face.
In the last year alone, religious hate crimes targeting Muslims rose by 15% in England and Wales.
This is utterly unacceptable. London will always stand against hatred, prejudice and discrimination.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
UK security agencies still assess Islamist extremism as the largest terrorism threat. MI5's Islamist-related caseload remains roughly 75% of its counter-terrorism work, according to recent threat assessments.
isdglobal.org/digital-dispat…
1
91
Greg Chew 🇮🇪🏴🇨🇭 retweeted
Since riots are now spreading across Europe, there are some simple things any country that wants to avoid them can announce.
Anyone found guilty of rioting/looting:
- who is a foreign national will be immediately deported
- who is a dual national will be immediately stripped of their citizenship, then deported
- who is an asylum seeker or has been granted asylum, will be denied asylum/deported
- permanently banned from receiving any benefits/welfare of any kind
- given harsh custodial sentences
Announce this now and avoid riots or watch your country go down the route of France and Germany.
Crypto is not blockchain. It sold itself as a way to trust the message, not the messenger, and delivered a casino. On Thursday $6.3 billion left @binance through one engineer's laptop, and every rescue was a messenger: issuers freezing balances, committees, an exchange's treasury.
That leaves crypto racing two deaths. The web's insecurity is the fast one, and no industry is more exposed to it. Its own practice is the slow one, and every rescue by a middleman feeds it, so which comes first is the only question left.
Link to the full essay with every source follows.
Here is the post, please subscribe if you'd like to get more long form deep dive discussion.
gregchew.ch/someone-answered…
This is complete fallacy. @cz_binance probably knows as well as I do that there is no hope for the web to be secured. Crypto is the web with total NPM compromise.
gregchew.ch/the-webs-y2k-mom…
User funds are safe!
It does look like a hack on Binance. Appreciate the quick freeze from Tether (~$971m) and Circle (~$823m).
I don't manage Binance (.com) anymore, but as a shareholder, I expect all user funds will be fully covered.
5
325
The illusion that the web and web connected operations can be secured is over.
For crypto - completely dependent on compromised NPM wallets - my money is on total compromise inside 6 months.
gregchew.ch/the-webs-y2k-mom…
What you do is a choice. Addiction is merely the excuse for your bad choices that you know are bad choices, you just don’t have the strength of character to admit it.
I eat too much nice food when I am at home with my family. Not my wife’s fault for making great food, mine for choosing to eat it all.
Matthew Perry’s sister, Mia Perry Bowick, has told a new documentary about her brother’s life that his 2013 #Newsnight debate with Peter Hitchens was a “huge moment” in his decision to speak publicly about addiction and “show himself”.
You can watch some of the debate here.
BBC Newsnight
Follow BBC Newsnight on Twitter. Like us on Facebook. Catch up on iPlayer https://bbc.in/2Ps915G
155
Web’s Y2K - AI isn’t the problem, the web’s architecture is.
Further to the TLDR post earlier on Longer form, prelude to the full report here if you’d like to get a bit deeper into this.
Taken a very long time to write given the breadth of the topic, but vital that people understand this and see the reality of the problem rather than the one that suits the AI companies seeking to create barriers to competition.
As you will all be aware with the PHP events this week, this is going to accelerate from here. 50 incidents explored in the full report, the reasons why the web cannot be patched to security laid bare in great detail.
For now, the ‘Executive Summary’:
gregchew.ch/the-webs-y2k-mom…
The web has never been secure, only expensive to attack. That stopped being true in April and the cost has been free falling since.
AI isn’t the problem. It’s the symptom and accelerant. The web itself - or rather, how we engage with it - needs to change.
gregchew.ch/the-webs-y2k-mom…
If ever you doubted that the ‘leadership’ of Europe hate Europeans, read this until you remember.
Someone sent me a post that said this on it about the murder of Liverpool’s Ken Bigley:
“These are the last images of Ken Bigley.
Moments before he knew his head was to be hacked off on camera.
I was sent the video years ago.
Not because of murder porn but as a warning of what will come if we don't stop it.
It changed me as a man.
Mohammed Yaseem took his time.
Smiled at the camera.
He took his time removing Kens head while still conscious.
Thats the idea.
The same as the videos of Jewish women having their breasts cut off and thrown around like a ball as she lays there screaming knowing whats coming next.
They kept him in a cage for hours telling him his inevitable fate.
Unimaginable cruelty.
His crime.... being a westerner.
His killer Mohamed Yaseen
Mohammed Yaseen is also responsible for setting fire to women and girls in cages for not submitting to Islam.
He burned them alive.
Laughing and shouting Allahu Akbar.
God is great
Setting fire to children and women and slowly removing another humans head whilst praising a sky wizard.....
Have a wild guess where he lives now????
Windsor.
Seen shopping in the Co Op
We know he's not working so your paying his rent, utilities and food bill.
Our government won't deport him or lock him up.
Where's the fuckin morality?”
It is truly terrifying what we are allowing our government to do to us.
2
183
These posts from @Babygravy9 and @GoodwinMJ and now @blaiklockBP keep appearing on my timeline and I have yet to hear one of them make a cogent argument.
“Unite the right”. Great as a tagline, but to unite, you have to unite on a single policy that you can all agree on and one that is important enough that you can put aside every other difference to focus on.
The left has that: the deification of the state and its continued elevation over the people who must be saved from themselves by big brother. They can unite on that and they have clear, emotive, superficially righteous signals for alignment - “tax the rich”; “fund the NHS”; “from each according to their means, to each according to their needs”;
The purpose of those is not just werewolf game style alignment, it is to stoke hatred and set the have nots against the haves with the illusion that the all powerful and magnanimous state will be benign and that money really can be pumped from the central banker’s font without any consequence that the deluded voter will see until it is too late.
What is our werewolf game for alignment on the right? I’d put it to you that it’s both simple and obvious what that singular issue is, but no party in Britain is committed to it, despite the fact that it’s an existential issue for the people of these islands and unless it is embraced, the political systems we have will enshrine Islam as the state religion by 2040, 2050 at the outside: re-migration.
Unless people are fully integrated and accepting of British values - as largely set out by the English gentlemen who were the founding fathers of America, ironically - language, culture and traditions - Christmas, Easter, Ash Wednesday, the patron feats of St. Patrick, St. George, not Eid or Diwali are the religious festivals of a country that if not actively Christian today is founded on Christian teachings and values - then they can and should return to whence they came.
Not just the illegals. The millions who came to Europe legally during a time when the governments of Europe were socialists set upon the destruction of Western civilisation in the pursuit of absolute power through the corruption of the democratic process by importing their voters.
Immigration works when it is limited and requires - absolutely - deep integration over generations.
Show me the party in Britain or Ireland that is committed at least to that fundamental, existential objective.
The nearest is Restore. They at least would deport the illegal migrants, pushing the collapse of our Nat
Farage and Reform have made clear their position is focused - as are all of their ‘policies’ - on what is palatable to the middle ground voter without any effort to debate or lead: stop the ‘small boats’. The equivalent of turning off a dripping tap after the bath has been run.
The spineless betrayers of their electorate that Reform are trying to win over by taking in so many former ministers - the conservatives for anyone not paying attention - have a similar position.
Big on headlines, small on impact, value or leadership. Leadership is not being elected by saying what you think the electorate want to hear. It is telling them what they need to hear and offering to lead them toward the answer, however hard the path, because the end is righteous.
Rupert Lowe, Ben Habib aside, who else has shown that kind of leadership? Name a single Reform or Conservative candidate that has shown a willingness to sacrifice short term polling for long term righteousness?
There hasn’t been a British leader in politics of real capacity or conviction since Thatcher.
Change that. Unify around a single truth so big and so fundamental that it is existential; LEAD our people, stop pandering to them and the state that has subjugated them and quietened them with ‘benefits’ and a the propaganda of ‘mainstream media’. LEAD!!!
One of the signs that Restore is set to be a terminal delusion is its thoroughgoing transformation into a self-esteem movement. Every single devastating result—yet another leftist victory by the tiniest of margins, even when the combined right has a thumping majority—becomes an opportunity to assert triumphantly, “You [Reform] aren’t entitled to our vote.” We reject your presumption! We are very dignified! If you don’t woo me correctly in every single way, well the country can burn! I am not a cheap mistress!
The instant resort to the language of self-esteem and personal dignity is very telling. There’s a great line in Bronze Age Mindset about the constant desire for respect being the refrain of the perennially slighted. It’s true.
I certainly don’t believe any party is “entitled” to anybody’s vote. There isn’t a perfect option and there’s never going to be. In fact, the problems facing Britain—and the rest of the Western world—are only partially amenable to political solutions. The immediate issue facing us is demographic change and whether Britain can survive another decade of left-wing government. It obviously can’t. If you think otherwise, your eyes are shut. Talk of an inevitable uprising is loose at best.
You say you want to save the country, but then you vote and encourage others to vote in a way that makes the prospect of a left-wing victory in a general election all-but assured. That’s your revealed preference. Pointing that out is not an affront to your dignity.
Now, if we can start with a single, existential, unifying policy, we can then ask the next question: What is the ‘right’?
I am the proper definition of “far right”: libertarian; capitalist; Christian; social and cultural conservative; nationalist, proudly Irish and proudly English, who would fight for our right to be such. My life work is the restoration of our data, our assets, our money to the individual. Restore the individual, restore the family; restore the family, restore the community; restore the community and you restore the nation; restore the nation and you can put the state back into being in service to the nation rather than in subjugation of it.
So let’s look at the parties actions rather than the campaign promises they ignore once in office and the policies they treat as vague directions rather than contracts with the voter.
The present day “Conservative” party is substantially to the left of Paddy Ashdown’s Liberal Democrats - so much so that the actual Liberal Democrats are trying to find a fringe vote between the so called conservatives and Labour. Arguably, even the most evil man in British history - Tony Blair, though if you named any of many contenders in his cabinet, I’d understand - is to the right of a Tory party that has MP’s they have endorsed who cannot tell a woman from a man.
Like the Tories from which they are derived, Reform are craven seekers of power, so they chase the centre left vote created by 40 years of brain washing in in state funded and socialist run schools, universities, state bodies and the mainstream media.
As to Restore… Rupert’s a good man, but I am not sure what their economic and social weighting is yet and I don’t think Restore do either. They are very, very far from being the disciplined machine needed to lead the electorate and win elections.
It turns out, what most people I talk to mean by ‘right’ is not policy driven or principle driven (God forbid!), but rather more simple and wrong: it is that you are to the right of Labour. The 1980’s Socialist Worker Party is to the right of today’s Labour Party. I am sure many of them would be delighted to hear that they are now “right wing”.
So now a dirty spectre raises its ugly head: the so called ‘far right’ that are actually nationalist socialists. Much like the actual Nationalist German Socialist Worker Party.
They aren’t selling any of the ideals of the right - most simply put as the elevation of the individual over the state, the vesting in the sovereign individual all of the rights and responsibilities that make them free under God - they are selling a nationalist socialist - handouts for ‘natives’ rather than foreigners, etc - agenda.
So again, show me the party who have, as Thatcher did, read books on capitalist policy - Von Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, Friedman, Sowell, Menger - and understood why they are right and righteous.
To ‘unite the right’, start with the single most important policy on which anyone who values anything of our nation, our people, our culture, our traditions, our history can unite on: re-migration.
Then define what is ‘right’. Right is derived from righteous. Embrace that. LEAD!



















