Hal Singer (@halsinger) header
Hal Singer (@halsinger) profile picture

Director @ EconOne | Editorial Board @TheSlingOrg | NYT: "one expert for the plaintiffs" | Prospect: "preeminent watchdog of The Economist's most wrong takes"

Joined December 2011
Photo by Hal Singer (@halsinger)Photo by Hal Singer (@halsinger)Photo by Hal Singer (@halsinger)Photo by Hal Singer (@halsinger)Photo by Hal Singer (@halsinger)Photo by Hal Singer (@halsinger)Photo by Hal Singer (@halsinger)Photo by Hal Singer (@halsinger)Photo by Hal Singer (@halsinger)Photo by Hal Singer (@halsinger)
Billionaire LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman donated $7 million to support Kamala Harris's presidential campaign, while publicly calling for her to fire Lina Khan. He donated millions to key Senate candidates while claiming that we need to build more data centers. If Reid wants money out of politics he should give without comment and never take a meeting with candidates who he gives to, but just two days ago he was boasting in the NY Times about his influence. If billionaires like Hoffman weren't handcuffing candidates with his bad, unpopular ideas as the price of a donation, the Democrats wouldn't need his donations.
We should get money out of politics. And while others spend outrageous amounts to keep authoritarian clowns in power, those of us who believe in the ideals of America cannot yield.
2
25
1
89
3,859
Hal Singer retweeted
A great interactive story, filled with testimonials from young people, about how demoralizing and dehumanizing it is right now trying to get a job. Searching for jobs, Gen Z feels likes it's staring into the void
1
2
2
7
1,381
Hal Singer retweeted
Replying to @RepRaskin
@RepRaskin introduced an important piece of legislation to begin the process of making antitrust less susceptible to corruption. The bill proposes a number of common sense policies (listed below). Enacting this legislation should be a no-brainer. democrats-judiciary.house.go…
11
1
21
2,244
NEWS: @RepRaskin has introduced the Antitrust Accountability and Transparency Act! As the Trump-Vance DOJ continues a pattern of backing away from major antitrust challenges — from Live Nation-Ticketmaster to HPE-Juniper, and more — it’s more urgent than ever to establish clear rules to stop corporations from lobbying their way out of accountability.
1
9
15
1,546
Hello @elonmusk and @tylercowen , You have just decided to publicly attack our research, six days before the vote on the California billionaire wealth tax. Your attempt to discredit our work and that of our numerous academic colleagues is pathetic. Let’s take a look. 🧵
151
652
97
2,424
287,683
Doordash and Instacart both have long histories of bullying Main Street businesses and workers. The FTC must block this merger. @LeeHepner on this in @CNNBusiness: “This merger represents the next frontier of data-driven abuse, exploiting massive asymmetries of power to squeeze worker compensation on the way in and drain consumer wallets on the way out.”
2
8
14
1,121
Hal Singer retweeted
I wrote an article about Kroger's plans to use facial recognition in stores for @thenation and a corporate PR flack wrote to my editor to complain about the piece and to deny they were using the tech. Now they don't even bother to deny it. Thanks to AELP for this investigation.
Big Grocery is watching and it could get much worse. As covered in @verge, a new report from the American Economic Liberties Project's @mh4oh and @victoriafreire0 lays out how Kroger's plans to absorb Giant Eagle expands the grocery giant's market power and surveillance🧵
2
50
4
111
6,941
Despite the suggestion in the subheadline that DoorDash-Instacart is a vertical merger (restaurant and grocery delivery, respectively), the story reveals that DoorDash has recently invaded Instacart’s “turf” in grocery delivery, which has horizontal implications. And that’s just in the output market. In the input markets for grocery stores and delivery drivers, the merger can be considered horizontal as well, potentially leading to higher commissions on stores and lower pay for workers.
2
15
23
2,160
To the reporters’ credit, competitive harms in the input market were mentioned in the article. Link here: nytimes.com/2026/10/29/techn…
2
4
328
Hal Singer retweeted
Spoke to @noamscheiber about Beth Wilkinson. My point: establishment Dems will likely praise her for defending ABC against Trump's FCC, and stay silent on the rest of the career. You can’t be the party of working people while in lockstep with the lawyers who enable the oligarchy.
1
13
1
23
7,390
Another "benefit" of AI, y'all. Sowing distrust in the workplace and creating tension between bosses and employees. Why would a worker embrace a tool that could displace said worker? Strong basis for why adoption of AI should be negotiated collectively by workers (i.e, the need for unions).
4
12
652
Yglesias makes the point that one should stay silent on unpopular issues so one can win elections and then do the unpopular thing. That’s an endorsement of systemic lying and betrayal as a governing strategy.
Me: "Even if it was unpopular, are you saying the Democratic Party should not speak out against the president sending migrants who have committed no crimes to be tortured in a foreign gulag?" @mattyglesias: "Yeah." Me: "Just stay silent?" Yglesias: "I think that sometimes, if you want to help people... you gotta win first." Me: "They might be dead in three years time, by the time you win." Despite all the arguments on this hellsite over the exact number of his Piker tweets, this was the part of my interview with Matthew Yglesias that really stood out to me. I was actually stunned by this response. Shouldn't politics also stand for something more than triangulation, polling and 4-D chess strategizing? Full interview: zeteo.com/p/matt-yglesias-me…
67
134
12
1,029
30,901
The Economist leader has a quote from a journalist (and author of The Strange Death of Liberal England) describing the breakdown of society before World War I that is just as apt today as it was a century ago.
2
7
2
23
1,832
Also enjoyed @TheEconomist’s jab at Musk here. It’s very important for oligarchs and their defenders to deflect blame away from a cruel economic system and towards a minority population that has NOTHING to do with the problems of falling real wages and lack of affordability.
1
1
5
380
And here’s the link to the Economist story. Excellent writing! The agony of liberal Europe economist.com/leaders/2026/1… from The Economist
1
188
In 1938, FDR warned the Nation that “a concentration of private power without equal in history” was growing in our midst. Today, I discovered that the concentration of private power he faced was NOTHING compared to the concentration we face today. In 1930, the largest 0.1% of American business firms controlled 47% of the country’s business assets. In 2013, the largest 0.1% of firms controlled 88% of business assets. That is bonkers. There is no way we can maintain anything resembling political democracy — let alone free enterprise — with such few hands gripping essentially all of the economic power in the country. In 1938, FDR predicted that “the liberty of a democracy will not be safe as long as the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic government itself.” “That, in its essence,” he said, “is Fascism — ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.” A few years later, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) conducted its own investigation into the concentration of economic power and found that the “dead hand of corporate control” had displaced free, private enterprise in most of the Nation’s basic industries. As a result, the FTC issued a stark warning to the country: “[A] definite choice has to be made,” the FTC said. “Either this country is going down the road to collectivism” and fascism, “or it must stand and fight for competition as the protector of all that is embodied in free enterprise.” That generation of Americans — the Greatest Generation that rose from the ashes of the Depression to beat Hitler, end Jim Crow, and bring about the most prosperous era in the Nation’s economic history — chose to fight. And they won. If American democracy is going to survive the critical moment we’re going through today, we need to relearn the wisdom of that New Deal generation — and act on it — fast. Like the Greatest Generation did in their time, we have to find “practical controls” over the “blind economic forces” and the “blindly selfish men” of our time. Like our forbears did on the eve of the Second World War, our task is nothing less than to rebuild “a way of living in which political democracy and free private enterprise serve and protect each other — to ensure a maximum of human liberty not for a few but for all.”
10
106
6
298
7,411
Hal Singer retweeted
NEW: Tax-obsessed billionaires bankrolled @GavinNewsom's businesses & career. E-card centimillionaire @JaredPolis's first move in politics was to try to block Obamacare's millionaire surtax. Now both blue-state governors are helping the GOP try to kill Dems' billionaire taxes.
4
105
2
225
5,960
34
541
57
1,979
49,636