Jummai

Why Would the Military Ignore a Soldier Celebrating Convicted Terrorist Nnamdi Kanu? By: Zagazola Makama There is something profoundly disturbing about the argument being advanced by those demanding the intervention of Tarok military generals over the detention of Gabriel Lamdip, popularly known as the “Push Up King.” The attempt to turn this matter into an ethnic solidarity campaign, while conveniently ignoring the gravity of the alleged conduct, is both misplaced and deeply troubling. The question is not whether Lamdip is Tarok, whether he enjoys the support of influential military officers or whether his family deserves compassion. The real question is simple: Can a serving soldier publicly demonstrate solidarity with a separatist figure associated with violence against Nigerian security personnel and expect the military to look the other way? Absolutely not! Let us stop hiding behind sentiment and confront the issue squarely. A serving soldier is not an ordinary civilian. He wears the uniform of the Nigerian Armed Forces, carries the responsibility of defending the Constitution and has sworn allegiance to the Federal Republic of Nigeria. His conduct, particularly on matters touching national security, separatist agitation and threats to national unity, must reflect the discipline and loyalty expected of a member of the military. If the video in question shows Lamdip performing push-ups in apparent solidarity with Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), then the matter deserves serious institutional attention. The explanation that Kanu shares a birthday with the soldier's son does not automatically erase the implications of such an act. Since when did a child's birthday become a convenient excuse for a serving soldier to publicly associate himself with a figure whose movement has been linked by the Nigerian government to deadly attacks against members of the nation's security forces? This is not about denying anyone the right to hold personal opinions. It is about the special obligations that come with wearing a military uniform. The Armed Forces are not a social club where personnel can freely blur the line between personal admiration, political activism and institutional loyalty. And those rushing to condemn the Army for investigating this matter should first remember the blood of Nigerian security personnel shed in the violence associated with IPOB and its armed wing, the Eastern Security Network (ESN). The record is grim. On May 3, 2022, Master Warrant Officer Audu Linus and Private Gloria Mathew were abducted while travelling in Imo State. They were brutally murdered and beheaded. In a statement issued the following day, the Presidency attributed the killings to IPOB and condemned the gruesome crime. On July 13, 2021, an attack on troops at the Iggah/Asaba checkpoint in Uzo-Uwani Local Government Area of Enugu State reportedly left two soldiers dead. The Nigerian Army attributed the attack to IPOB and its Eastern Security Network. In November 2021, two police inspectors, identified as Akubo and Adamu, were abducted and murdered. Their bodies were reportedly decapitated, while footage of the killings was circulated. The Federal Government attributed the operation to IPOB members. On May 30, 2024, armed men attacked a military checkpoint in Abia State. The Nigerian Army blamed IPOB for the attack, which reportedly killed five soldiers. Six civilians also died in the violence, according to an account cited in the UK government's country report. The figures announced by the Federal Government are equally alarming. In October 2021, the then Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, disclosed that a government committee had attributed 175 security personnel deaths between October 2020 and June 2021 to IPOB and ESN. The figure comprised 128 police officers, 37 military personnel and 10 other security operatives.