How to be Christian

Thank you to Doug (@P1neCreek), a former Protestant and current atheist, who was kind enough to share his thoughts on Part I of our mini-series called "What Does 'Eat My Flesh' Mean?"! // Here are some of the comments we received on the video: Ironworthstriking wrote: "Fascinating video. Really cool to hear an atheist’s view on this. Especially since he used to be a Protestant. It gives him a really good foundation of understanding the topic... He’s clearly a smart guy and we should keep him in our prayers!" HalfHotHalfCold wrote: "All things considered this is an amazing video and perspective." freddavis976 wrote: "The video is stupid. Both creators are stupid. Every comment I've read is stupid." MrsYasha1984 wrote: "I want to thank Doug for his thoughtful and calm interaction with the matter. He seems like a lovely man and I will pray for him and his wife, who surely is lovely too!" Leighton Flowers (@Soteriology101) said: "In my experience with Doug, ...he's a nice guy and everything, but in my experience, atheists, like Doug, they're seeking to disprove Christianity; that's the whole purpose of their channel. And therefore, ...he will often side with the most difficult, strangest, or difficult to swallow pill being presented. Why? Because that serves his purpose as an atheist. And so, he wants (it seems to me) people to think that true Christianity, as the Bible is teaching it, is the most difficult and hard to grasp thing." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments! // You can watch "Part I" here: youtube.com/watch?v=eWDxM-6T… // To Doug, I'd love to hear your thoughts on Part II, if you have the time. The illogical arguments that certain Protestants are using are wild (...and, at times, hilarious). Let us know if you review it, and we can tell our audience to tune in. Thank you! Here is the link to Part II: youtube.com/watch?v=f-jinF-O…

Comments like this one from @Kenneedsgrace demonstrate just how weak and pathetic the man-made, anti-Christian, religion of Protestantism is. Ken saw an argument that proves that his Protestant “church” could not possibly be Jesus’s One True Church, and instead of interacting with that argument, and trying to refute it, he tried to change the subject. (Protestantism sets its victims up for failure all of the time, so Ken employing the “run away” method is no surprise.) When you see a Protestant deflecting like this, it’s a good idea to ask yourself, “if this deflection argument were true, would that change anything about the initial argument?” In this case, even if Ken were correct, and the Catholic Christian Church was not Jesus’s Church, then that still would not change the fact that Ken’s “church” is definitely not Jesus’s Church. So, Ken has two major problems here: 1) Ken has absolutely no proof for his claim about the Catholic Christian Church. 2) Even if Ken could prove his claim, it wouldn’t change the fact that Ken’s Protestant “church” is a fake church. // Don’t be a Protestant in a fake church. Be a Christian in Jesus’s One True Church.

Every argument for Protestantism boils down to the same thing, which is: “X is what I believe in, because I personally have chosen to interpret the Word of God in a way that is not at odds with X (but I totally could be wrong about my personal interpretation and X could be completely false)”. Whether the argument comes from someone like @Soteriology101 or @gavinortlund, who typically seem to at least TRY putting thought into their arguments, or whether it comes from the lazy/trash content created by folks like @taco_talks, @ApologiaStudios, and @needGod_net, the result is always the same. Their argument is nothing more than simply: “I believe in X…because I said so.” They are willing to believe in the “Word of God” IF the “Word of God” can be interpreted in the way that their “Words of Men” choose to interpret them. // Don’t be a Protestant. Be a Christian. Believe in Jesus. Jesus told His followers to listen to His Church (Matthew 18), so when it comes to finding the correct interpretation of the Bible, don’t listen to Protestant men, listen to Jesus. God bless!

Update: Ben (@C2Antiquity) blocked our account again 🤣 Ben talked a big game initially, but, as usual, we brought the facts to the table and Ben went scurrying away to hide behind his block button. I love it when the bullies flee!

The Ridiculous Logic of Ben (@C2Antiquity): Because I supplied supporting evidence for an observation that Brayden (@The_Catechumen) made about Ben’s “join my livestream” attitude, Ben now thinks I should defend EVERYTHING that Brayden has ever said 🤣 Brayden is fully capable of defending his own words; especially against someone as unremarkable as Ben. (Attachment #1: Ben tries to run away from our actual post; changing to a completely different topic.) // Again, if Ben would like to debate anything that I have actually said, then I welcome that! This includes what I chimed in on Brayden’s post about. If Ben wishes to end the conversation again without introducing a debate topic again, then we are fine with him doing that as well. (Attachment #2: Our debate offer to anyone who disagrees with our content.) // Ben is a bully. Bullies have a tendency to be predictable. It’s fun to see the bullies run away. He even deleted his post 🤣 Come back any time, Ben! (Attachment #3: Ben leans into his typical bully ways; he later deletes this post. Ben likely realized that the video in our reply to his post was going to make people realize how pathetic Ben has been during this interaction.) (Attachment #4: Our response to Ben’s post, prior to him deleting it. Here is the video that we attached to Ben’s post: youtu.be/izGCqYDuHUU?is=xmy6…

Oh, look who finally unblocked our account 😏 Our debate offer to you still stands, Ben (@C2Antiquity). Note: “Debates” are not the same as “livestreams”. I have no interest in joining your livestream, but if you’d like to debate anything I’ve said, then please, feel free to enter into a debate with us. Here’s the offer again:

Ben (@C2Antiquity) is an ignorant bully who thinks very highly of himself. I am glad to see that Brayden (@The_Catechumen) didn’t give the bully what he wanted. Ben once made a three hour long livestream where he was just waiting for me to join him live. He refused to tell me what he wanted to debate, even though I asked him for a topic multiple times. He just kept saying “[come up live]”, because what he really wanted was a guest for his livestream, not an actual debate. It was pathetic. Someone asked if they could join him, and he told them “no”, because he was waiting for me. Again… he waited for THREE HOURS 🤣 Ben also texted his wife during the livestream, to have her bring him his earbuds, just in case I called in. How sad is that for Ben’s wife? Her husband sat online for THREE HOURS begging for the company of a man who would never show up. I wonder if she had to comfort him after he got stood up 🤔 Can you imagine what her parents would say to their son-in-law if they found out? “Explain this to me again, Ben. You spent three hours online, waiting for a man that you never met, when our daughter… your wife… was in the other room? And as if that wasn’t lame enough, you had her fetch you your earbuds, because you were so focused on talking to this man that you never met, that you didn’t want to risk missing him, while you grabbed your own darn earbuds!?!”