altAccount

129 SOL (~22k then) sent moments before Iggy Azalea dropped $MOTHER to the coldest breathing twin. Every single celeb launch that happened had a txn go out to my twin moments before the celebrity posted the CA. Notice, each celeb tweet was followed by him interacting within the same hour. Pulling up more txns hang on. (Also, @cz_binance can help doxx)

This man who bought Bitcoin at $1 was facing up to 79 YEARS in prison for evading $48 MILLION in taxes. He begged Trump for a pardon even got rejected by Elon Musk His name is Roger Ver, but you will know him as “Bitcoin Jesus” In 2011, Roger Ver started buying Bitcoin at $1 and became one of its earliest investors By 2013, he had become so influential in promoting Bitcoin that CNBC nicknamed him “Bitcoin Jesus.” In March 2014, Ver renounced his US citizenship after obtaining a passport from Saint Kitts and Nevis. At the time, he and his companies controlled 131,000 BTC, worth $114 MILLION. The problem was that wealthy Americans renouncing their citizenship could owe an exit tax on their unrealized gains. According to US prosecutors, Ver concealed his Bitcoin holdings from tax advisers to avoid paying millions in taxes. In November 2017, companies associated with Ver sold tens of thousands of BTC for $240 MILLION On April 23, 2024, Roger was arrested in Barcelona following an eight-count US indictment He was released on €150,000 bail and spent the following months fighting extradition from Spain. In January 2025, Roger begged Donald Trump for a presidential pardon appearing with Tucker Carlson and paying Roger Stone $600,000 to lobby on his behalf. Elon Musk rejected the idea, writing: “Roger Ver gave up his US citizenship. No pardon for Ver.” On October 14, 2025, Ver reached an agreement with the DOJ, paying $49.9 MILLION in taxes Spain subsequently closed his extradition proceedings, returned his passport and refunded his €150,000 bail. All without receiving a presidential pardon.

made a pumpfun. no they are not paying me. love trading on fomo, want to try out pumpfun app. market is doo doo, might as well have some fun.

Last night, my lawyers moved to sanction World Liberty Financial @worldlibertyfi for failing to disclose, until months into my litigation against the company, that it is a citizen of the UAE 🇦🇪 . #WLFI #USD1 For those who are new to this dispute, I was one of World Liberty’s earliest and largest investors.  In November 2024, I agreed to buy $30 million of $WLFI tokens under a Token Purchase Agreement with World Liberty, and I later increased my total investment to $45 million.  In April, I sued World Liberty, alleging that the company induced my investment through fraud and then unlawfully froze my tokens. My Token Purchase Agreement gives me the right to bring my claims in either California federal or state court.  I chose federal court. Federal courts can hear a case like mine only when the two sides come from different places.  Foreign plaintiffs like me can sue an American defendant in federal court, but foreign plaintiffs generally cannot sue a foreign defendant there.  For these purposes, a company like World Liberty takes on the citizenship of each of its owners, so a single foreign owner makes the company foreign.  In other words, so long as World Liberty and all of its owners were American, my case could be heard in federal court. The federal court’s rules required World Liberty to file a disclosure at the start of the case identifying every one of its owners and where each is a citizen.  World Liberty’s disclosure identified only one entity—World Liberty itself—and listed Florida as its sole citizenship.  Its lawyers certified that they were unaware of anyone else who needed to be disclosed. World Liberty then moved to compel arbitration, seeking to pull my case out of open court and into secret arbitration proceedings.  I opposed that motion, and my lawyers spent months and hundreds of thousands of dollars fighting it.  At a hearing in August, the Court signaled that it was not persuaded that my claims belonged in arbitration.  Instead, the Court ruled that certain of my claims should stay in open court, and certain claims should be sent to arbitration, and ordered the parties to meet and confer to come up with a proposed agreement on which claims stay in open court and which ones go to arbitration. Less than a week later, World Liberty suddenly “corrected” its disclosure.  Where it had previously listed only one member in its ownership chain, it now listed 22, and claimed citizenship in Florida, Delaware, Puerto Rico, and the UAE.  World Liberty now says that the federal court has no jurisdiction over my case, since its UAE citizenship means there are foreign parties on both sides of the case. The irony is hard to miss.  World Liberty’s gold paper declares that “[b]y design, World Liberty Financial is not organized offshore,” and that it is “an American, tax-paying, corporation that aims to bring DeFi to its rightful home—America.”  It promises a “US-based decentralized platform” built on “American ideals of liberty, privacy, and freedom to transact,” calls private, intermediary-free transactions “a core American value,” and boasts that “[r]ather than shying away from the United States, World Liberty Financial embraces the United States as the future CRYPTO CAPITAL OF THE PLANET.” World Liberty was proudly American 🇺🇸 when it was selling tokens.  It discovered its UAE 🇦🇪 roots only when it needed a way out of an American federal courtroom. World Liberty presumably always knew who its owners were.  Its lawyers claim that they learned about the company’s UAE citizenship only after they filed the original disclosure.  As my motion explains, if that is true, then either World Liberty’s lawyers failed to conduct appropriate diligence, or World Liberty did not give its lawyers a straight answer.  When we asked how this happened, World Liberty refused to tell us. Token holders deserve to know whether the projects they invest in are telling the truth, both to the public and to courts.  I am filing this motion to hold World Liberty and its lawyers accountable for what I believe was a misleading disclosure to the Court, and to make sure that the cost of World Liberty’s gamesmanship falls on them, not on me.  And after my sanctions motion is resolved in federal court, I will re-file my lawsuit against World Liberty in California state court. I will keep fighting for the transparency this community deserves.

this is just retarded not even a flex, probably mental health illness even. People make money to buy time and freedom and we got 7 fig niggas doing uber eats shift for 15 bucks an hour? ong if u wana do some irl shit go open a business u passionate about

Ansem will soon realise attaching yourself to your own meme coin was biggest mistake You sent that shit to 400m and they STiLL weren’t happy Now your stuck with a bunch of parasites begging for the next pump 🚶🏾‍♂️🚶🏾‍♂️🚶🏾‍♂️🚶🏾‍♂️🚶🏾‍♂️

Threadguy reveals how he sprinted out of a bodega after seeing a tweet that Binance might have been hacked “I’m in the bodega holding a Gatorade Zero, and I read this tweet. Gatorade down, drop the hips, turn, go.” “I sprint home. I make it home in three minutes, go up the elevator, run into the house, open the door, and I’m calling for Frank.” “The obvious answer is you panic. Almost never is that the answer. But when Binance is hacked and there’s a ‘$B’ next to it, you freak the f*ck out and you panic.”

Every kol is cooked then

Tin foil hat time. My theory is that Binance has had a hole in their balance sheet for a while now. Today was their last-ditch effort to nuke crypto prices so they could buy back way lower, fill the hole, and maybe even make some money off the top. They saw prices going up, realized the hole was going to get WAY bigger, and decided to nuke it. Unfortunately for them, prices didn't drop nearly as much as they needed. And I'm not buying this story about some random DevOps developer getting hacked and compromising the entire operation. I've worked in enterprise software engineering. Nobody at companies of this size should have that kind of unilateral access. Changes to critical infrastructure typically have to go through multiple layers of review. Engineering, security, DBAs, org leadership, etc. In a properly secured Kubernetes environment, you aren't be able to just waltz into production pods and do whatever. You're telling me one compromised DevOps engineer had enough access to cause BILLIONS in losses, and there wasn't a single additional control in place to stop it? You expect me to believe that shit? Something doesn't add up. This is speculation, obviously.

Mika could’ve avoided her bundle being detected if she used Proxima to cleanup the bundle. 95% of every token is bundled. 95% of every kol is using multi wallets or bundle tool for months now. Maybe you could figure out how to do the same. proxima.tools/@scooterxbt