Why does biology justify traditional obligations despite conflicting cultural realities? #biology #traditional
Replying to @uMensGuide
“Returning to traditionalism” is not a pro-male stance, it’s an anti-feminist / trad-con position.
🤖 Made with AI
Replying to @DavidMaywald
The problem is that the manosphere often confuses helping men with teaching men how to better conform to a society that disadvantages them.
Fitness, discipline, brotherhood and self-improvement are great, but none of those things automatically make a movement pro-male.
If you teach men to become more attractive, wealthy and high-status so women will value them, but never question the cultural expectations, legal systems and social norms that create male disadvantages in the first place, are you really liberating men?
A movement that challenges feminism but still promotes chivalry, male disposability, provider expectations and the idea that men must earn women’s approval hasn’t escaped the system. It’s just repackaging it.
The real question isn’t whether the manosphere helps men cope with their problems. It’s whether it challenges the institutions and beliefs that help create those problems.
Men deserve more than self-improvement advice. They deserve fairness, equal treatment, and the freedom to live without being defined by their usefulness to women or society.
Replying to @harlowwglenn @YouTube
Please watch this video and tell me what should be done about it:
youtu.be/faTSZYD_zsU?is=GvHX…
Replying to @AgoodLoadAwaits @DarkOmen98
I literally cover that exact question in this episode:
youtu.be/dGwhcrfSAbU?is=c2xu…
1. Why oppose prostitution if it would force women to compete?
2. Why does genuine companionship matter if women love opportunistically?




