It's the Joos

In its initial effort to discredit National Socialism after 1945, the postwar establishment went considerably further, eventually seeking to repudiate anything that stood in the way of the emerging liberal project to establish a new global order. Virtually anything that challenged its conception of man and society as fundamentally malleable became suspect. This extended from theories emphasizing immutable hereditary and biological differences to older conceptions of race and eugenics, as well as forms of nationalism that rejected a purely civic conception of national identity. Nor was this transformation confined to academia. Scholarly consensus informed the media, which in turn shaped popular culture, until what began as an intellectual orthodoxy became an ideological one, increasingly reflected in the institutions of the state. A "culture of critique" emerged and gradually came to reign supreme. The emerging liberal order, the Regime, embraced a conception of man and society as fundamentally subject to alteration, placing itself in direct opposition to any understanding of human nature that emphasized inherited characteristics and the immutability of certain human differences. One of the great truths of historical existence that this intellectual transformation sought to obscure is that culture reflects the people who create it. Culture, in this understanding, is biology made visible. Change the people, and the culture will change with them. The demographic transformations now underway throughout America and the West are already altering the character of our nations, including the values and institutions through which their peoples have historically expressed themselves. The purpose of obscuring these realities through propaganda masquerading as science and the threat of social ostracism is to conceal the cumulative consequences of such transformations upon a society and, ultimately, its civilization, until they reach a critical mass beyond which their effects become nearly impossible to reverse. The great irony is that advances in science, in this case archaeogenetics, are now furnishing empirical evidence for historical relationships between ancestry and culture that had become intellectually verboten. Ideas once dismissed on ideological grounds under the guise of a so-called scientific consensus are now being subjected to renewed scrutiny by the very scientific methods that ought to have governed their acceptance or rejection in the first place. What was once treated as settled science must now answer to the evidence itself. It is therefore imperative that we continue to press these questions and challenge such spurious orthodoxies as new discoveries emerge. The survival of our people and the preservation of our civilization itself will depend upon our willingness to confront reality as it is, rather than as the prevailing ideological orthodoxies would have us believe it to be.