
đłđŹ. Social psychologist. AP @KelloggSchool. Racial Equity Fellow @HBS. @Yale & @UCLA alumna. Tweets: race, feminism, current events, academia, amusing things
Boston, MA
Joined January 2010
- Tweets63.1K
- Following3.4K
- Followers16.1K
- Likes78.9K
Pinned Tweet
I feel like this was a success last year. Let's roll call again.
Underrepresented folks on the 2023-2024 job markets in social psychology & management/OB, please reply with some info about you & a link to your website (make one if you havenât yet!) Good luck!
After 2 years, I'm back teaching Leading & Managing Teams! For the final project, the students use class insights to offer pro-bono consulting to real-world teams. If you're interested, please complete this brief form at your earliest convenience!
kellogg.qualtrics.com/jfe/foâŚ
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
I just gave a closed-book, pen-and-paper midterm exam in my 300-level course at UBC with 100 students. All exams were graded by an experienced graduate-level TA according to a rubric.
*** The average was 64/100.***
My class averages at UBC are usually 80-85.
Context:
⢠This was the first midterm, covering ONLY 4 weeks of material.
⢠Students had a list of possible questions in advance: no surprise questions.
⢠Questions included (a) 3 concept definitions, (b) 3 paragraph-long questions, and (c) a 1.5-page essay.
⢠I have taught this class multiple times. Nothing in my teaching style changed this semester.
⢠We read entire paragraphs of text in class, so students don't have to do something on their own that wasn't covered during the lecture.
⢠Students take a 10-question multiple-choice quiz at the end of every class (30% of the final grade).
⢠Attendance is 95-99% every class. Attention during lectures and participation in pair-work activities are very high â anticipating the end-of-class quiz.
*** But unfortunately, I suspect many students are not reading the material on the syllabus. They are asking LLMs to summarize it instead.***
After the midterm, students reported:
⢠They thought they knew concept definitions but couldn't produce them on paper.
⢠They thought they understood the arguments but struggled to connect them or identify points of agreement and disagreement.
My view:
It might be âcoolâ or âinnovativeâ to teach students to summarize readings with ChatGPT or write essays with Claude. But we may be doing them a disservice: reducing their ability to retain material, think creatively, and reason from what they know. If you only read what AI has summarized for you, you donât truly "know" the material.
Moving forward:
We have a second midterm coming up. I don't know how to convey to students that the best way to do better on the exam is to rely on and improve their own reading skills.
Ezra Klein: "Having AI summarize a book or paper for me is a disaster.
It has no idea what I really wanted to know and wouldn't have made the connections I would've made. I'm interested in the thing I will see that other people wouldn't have seen, and I think AI typically sees what everybody else would see.
I'm not saying that AI can't be useful, but I'm pretty against shortcuts.
And obviously, you have to limit the amount of work you're doing. You can't read literally everything. But in some ways, I think it's more dangerous to think you've read something that you haven't than to not read it at all.
I think the time you spend with things is pretty important."
@ezraklein
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
"bets made among the staff over which detainee would be next to die by suicide."
Attempted suicides. Fights. Disease. Hunger. Dozens of calls to 911 and interviews with detainees offer a disturbing portrait of conditions at the nationâs largest U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility. apnews.com/article/suicide-iâŚ
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
Ezra Klein: "Having AI summarize a book or paper for me is a disaster.
It has no idea what I really wanted to know and wouldn't have made the connections I would've made. I'm interested in the thing I will see that other people wouldn't have seen, and I think AI typically sees what everybody else would see.
I'm not saying that AI can't be useful, but I'm pretty against shortcuts.
And obviously, you have to limit the amount of work you're doing. You can't read literally everything. But in some ways, I think it's more dangerous to think you've read something that you haven't than to not read it at all.
I think the time you spend with things is pretty important."
@ezraklein
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
đ¨BREAKING: OpenAI published a paper proving that ChatGPT will always make things up.
Not sometimes. Not until the next update. Always. They proved it with math.
Even with perfect training data and unlimited computing power, AI models will still confidently tell you things that are completely false. This isn't a bug they're working on. It's baked into how these systems work at a fundamental level.
And their own numbers are brutal. OpenAI's o1 reasoning model hallucinates 16% of the time. Their newer o3 model? 33%. Their newest o4-mini? 48%. Nearly half of what their most recent model tells you could be fabricated. The "smarter" models are actually getting worse at telling the truth.
Here's why it can't be fixed. Language models work by predicting the next word based on probability. When they hit something uncertain, they don't pause. They don't flag it. They guess. And they guess with complete confidence, because that's exactly what they were trained to do.
The researchers looked at the 10 biggest AI benchmarks used to measure how good these models are. 9 out of 10 give the same score for saying "I don't know" as for giving a completely wrong answer: zero points. The entire testing system literally punishes honesty and rewards guessing.
So the AI learned the optimal strategy: always guess. Never admit uncertainty. Sound confident even when you're making it up.
OpenAI's proposed fix? Have ChatGPT say "I don't know" when it's unsure. Their own math shows this would mean roughly 30% of your questions get no answer. Imagine asking ChatGPT something three times out of ten and getting "I'm not confident enough to respond." Users would leave overnight. So the fix exists, but it would kill the product.
This isn't just OpenAI's problem. DeepMind and Tsinghua University independently reached the same conclusion. Three of the world's top AI labs, working separately, all agree: this is permanent.
Every time ChatGPT gives you an answer, ask yourself: is this real, or is it just a confident guess?
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
Microsoft Research + Salesforce just dropped a paper that should scare every single AI builder right now.
They tested 15 of the top models (GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, o3, DeepSeek R1, Llama 4) across 200,000+ simulated conversations.
The results are actually terrifying.
If you give a model a single-turn prompt, it hits 90% performance. But if you have a multi-turn conversation? it plummets to 65%.
same model. same task. just.. talking normally.
The crazy part is that the ai isn't getting dumber (aptitude only dropped 15%). the problem is that unreliability EXPLODED by 112%..
Here is exactly why they break:
â they answer before you finish explaining, and those wrong assumptions get baked in permanently
â they fall in love with their first wrong answer and just keep building on it
â they completely forget the middle of your conversation
â longer responses introduce more assumptions, which means more errors
Even the new reasoning models failed. o3 and deepseek r1 performed just as badly. giving them extra "thinking tokens" did absolutely nothing. setting temperature to 0? still broken.
Every benchmark we celebrate is tested in perfect, single-prompt lab conditions. but real conversations break every model on the market and nobody is talking about it..
The only fix right now? stop chatting. Give your AI everything upfront in one massive message instead of going back-and-forth.
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
I just found out that @AnthemBCBS is denying my little sister's 2nd CAR T-cell therapy for her cancer, saying that they only do one per patient per lifetime. Yet, this is the only treatment option available to her given that she's had a bone marrow transplant and a different version of CAR T-cell therapy, but given the cost of the procedure, they would rather deny it and save themselves money versus giving her life-saving treatment.
Something is severely broken in our healthcare system if we pay for it and the health insurance companies can make purely financial decisions for denying treatment, especially for cancer patients. Her doctors have appealed TWICE and been denied, is there anybody at @AnthemBCBS that can help get approval for her CAR-T treatment?
So grateful for the many men like this who are showing up. Itâs just nice to see the bravery and commitment to defend what the US could and should be.
When Ian Austin, an Army veteran, was arrested for protesting ICE in Minneapolis, he says he was detained and shackled for hours.
âWe're turning into something that I can't even begin to respect, and something that I literally went to warâor they told me I went to warâto fight against,â he says.
Since he was arrested, heâs continued protesting. Mother Jones senior reporter Julia Lurie spoke to Austin outside the Whipple Federal Building, where ICE is based.
âWhen they say, âWhy would you be out here?â How the fuck could I not be out here?â he says. âMy nation is under attack."
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
.@Sec_Noem has forfeited her right to lead. I'm calling on her to resign.Â
Gregory Bovino must also be fired.
No one, not an ICE agent, not a federal officer, not a president, is above the law.
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
I would offer that Alex Pretti putting his bodyâwith his hands upâbetween a woman and the BP agent who had just violently shoved her into the snow, offer stark competing visions of manhood. Pretti, a nurse caring for veterans, who took a face full of pepper spray to shield that woman, is a much better masculine ideal that the masked coward shoving the woman and executing a man on his knees. MAGA may venerate the latter, but most people in a healthy society want the former.
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
BREAKING: After successfully forcing a vote, Democrats have officially passed their bill to extend lifesaving Affordable Care Act subsidies in the House.
The bill now heads to the Senate.
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
Mehdi Hasanâs art in discombobulating the hypocrisy of intellectually dishonest debates should be studied. This is chefâs kiss!
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
If you look at who Hegseth has fired itâs overwhelmingly women and Black people.
NEW: A distinguished female Navy captain within Naval Special Warfare â a Purple Heart recipient with experience w/ SEAL Team Six â was expected to take command this summer, when it was abruptly cancelled just days before. The impression within the NSW community: Secretary Hegseth did not want a woman fronting a role that would recruit special operations.
Her career is now effectively over.
That and more about how women in the military are being impacted by current policies and rhetoric around their service, w/ @brikeilarcnn @ikhurshudyan
cnn.com/2025/11/11/politics/âŚ
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
A new YouGov survey finds that nationally, Mamdani's policies are actually quite popular, including 57% support of government-owned grocery stores.
This is nationally, not just NYC:
Ivy Onyeador retweeted
Weâre hiring!
Our new resume portal is live, and weâre looking for top talent in NYC to help build this administration and deliver on our affordability agenda.
Could that be you? Apply using the link below.
transition2025.com/apply
Congrats to Howard! And shoutout to (my favorite?) billionaire MacKenzie Scott. I love watching how she makes her gifts. Esp as we watch too many other billionaires move totally differently/depressingly.
Howard University has received a transformative $80 million unrestricted gift from philanthropist MacKenzie Scott ... one of the single largest contributions in the Universityâs history.
This historic investment will strengthen student aid, support infrastructure improvements, advance research and health sciences, and sustain our mission of truth and service for generations to come.
Full Story: thedig.howard.edu/all-storieâŚ
#howarduniversity
*taps on mic*
anyone out there? it's me, I've been away for a while since the platform became...whatever this is.
Anyway, I return to invite interested candidates to apply for the Kellogg DRRC postdoc! I'd love to see your application.
kellogg.northwestern.edu/acaâŚ






























