Yes Yes! - talk shit on @City_Xtra | Insta: cxjordypordy |
Bolton
Joined June 2009
- Tweets4.5K
- Following1.1K
- Followers3.5K
- Likes4.6K
Jordy Pordy retweeted
ENZO MARESCA HAS NO IDEA WHAT HE HAS DONE FOR FT: teapaw.org/Copaz16w/status/210932…
Jordy Pordy retweeted
Feel cheated right now, but nothing can take the memories and experiences away from me. Watching us lift the treble in Istanbul, Aguero 93:20, countless Wembley trips, champions league away days with the boys. You can’t take that away from me 🩵
Jordy Pordy retweeted
I'm the only one left at Carrow Road 🤣 COME ON THE WANDERERS!!! #BWFC #BOLTONWANDERERS
Jordy Pordy retweeted
Pro Ref: “On this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his [Enzo Fernandez’s] position and should have recommended an on-field review. Contact has been made with Manchester United to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement…”
Manchester City:
Jordy Pordy retweeted
This just made the win feel much better.. holdddd 😭😭
🚨 OFFICIAL: Pro Ref confirm “an error of judgement” in Haaland’s goal — also informing Man United directly.
“Following the incident in the 60th minute of Sunday's Premier League fixture between Manchester United and Manchester City at Old Trafford, we can provide clarification regarding Erling Haaland’s awarded goal.
“The on-field decision was offside against Erling Haaland – that was checked by VAR and he was found to be in an onside position.
“In the same attack, it was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective, however, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.
“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.”
Jordy Pordy retweeted
oh no 💀
BREAKING: Pro Ref have acknowledged “an error of judgement” in Erling Haaland’s winning goal vs Manchester United.
Statement: “Following the incident in the 60th minute of Sunday's Premier League fixture between Manchester United and #ManCity at Old Trafford, we can provide clarification regarding Erling Haaland’s awarded goal.
“The on-field decision was offside against Erling Haaland – checked by VAR and he was found to be in an onside position.
“In the same attack, it was established Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective, however, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.
“Contact has been made with Manchester United to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place…” [via @JacobsBen]
Hahahhaahahaha ain't Karma a big ol bastard
🚨 OFFICIAL: Pro Ref confirm “an error of judgement” in Haaland’s goal — also informing Man United directly.
“Following the incident in the 60th minute of Sunday's Premier League fixture between Manchester United and Manchester City at Old Trafford, we can provide clarification regarding Erling Haaland’s awarded goal.
“The on-field decision was offside against Erling Haaland – that was checked by VAR and he was found to be in an onside position.
“In the same attack, it was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective, however, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.
“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.”
Jordy Pordy retweeted
Terry, you really should check with Terry.
I'm genuinely baffled by this one.
Forget Haaland for a moment. Look at Enzo Fernández.
He's in an offside position and, in my view, clearly attempts to play the ball and impacts the situation. That's precisely why the offside law matters here.
VAR has had the opportunity to examine this from multiple angles and still allowed it.
For me, that's a massive VAR error.
Jordy Pordy retweeted
Po-Tay-To / Po-Tah-To.
Henry Winter Edition.
Enzo Fernandez is "clearly attempting to play" the ball when in an offside position. It clearly impacts on Lisandro Martinez, who's drawn away from Erling Haaland because Fernandez is diving for the cross. Poor use of VAR. Manchester United will have a grievance over that...
...but so will Manchester City over Bruno Fernandes not seeing red, or even yellow, in the Phil Foden incident. Foden deserved to go, no argument, straight red for violent conduct but Fernandes deserved some sanction. Fernandes is PFA POTY and FWA FOTY and part of the criteria for the vote is sporting attitude.
City deserved the win - their intelligence, work-rate, ball retention and defiance all exceptional. Guehi and Anderson especially immense. City didn't look to have only 10. That's credit to them - and an indictment of United.
Michael Carrick will get questioned - and he could have brought on Benjamin Sesko earlier - but the real questions should be for the United board. They strengthened the attack last summer, midfield this summer and intend to strengthen the defence next summer. Why wait? United's defence needed work last year, let alone wait for next year.
Ineos and United's board have let Carrick down. United have smartened up the front of the house, done up the hallway, but left the back-door open. Diogo Dalot is hardly Gary Neville level. Nor is Noussair Mazraoui. Patrick Dorgu is a risk defensively.
United should long ago have targeted a successor to Luke Shaw (currently injured) and brought one in rather than delay. Praying Shaw stays fit is not a practicable policy. Yes he played 38 PL last season. But, all comps, Shaw has missed 103 games in three seasons (before this). It's frustrating; because Shaw's elite when fit.
As for centre-backs, Harry Maguire and Martinez arrived before Ineos. And they are starting for United. Ayden Heaven will doubtless mature into a very good centre-back one day. Carrick may not be in post by then. He could pay the price because the balance of recruitment was wrong. The Andrey Santos money (£48m; nice work Chelsea) should have been used to strengthen part of the defence.
But nothing should take away from City's deserved win. #MUNMCI
Jordy Pordy retweeted
🚨 𝗖𝗥𝗔𝗭𝗬 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗧: Phil Foden produced the same amount of key passes (1) as Bruno Fernandes today.
Phil Foden was sent off in minute 23.
Bruno Fernandes played 95 minutes.
