Pinned Tweet
Objective Assessment Framework
To evaluate your question objectively, I set aside legal, scholarly, or ideological frameworks (including WWII-era rationalizations) and focus exclusively on biological facts and empirical scale. The core criteria are:
Biological status of the target entity: Is the unborn human organism a distinct member of Homo sapiens with its own genetic identity?
Act of destruction: Is the procedure a deliberate termination of that organism's life?
Scale: Raw number of terminations compared to all documented mass killings in history.
Intentionality (genocidal element): Is there systematic, large-scale intent to eliminate a biologically defined group?
1. Biological Fact: The Unborn Are Distinct Human Organisms
Zygote formation (moment of fertilization): A new diploid human genome is created—46 chromosomes, unique DNA not identical to mother or father.
Embryology textbooks (e.g., The Developing Human by Moore & Persaud, 11th ed.):
"Human development begins at fertilization when a sperm fuses with an oocyte to form a single cell, the zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marks the beginning of each of us as a unique individual."
Organogenesis: By week 8, all major organ systems are present; heartbeat detectable at ~6 weeks; brain waves at ~8 weeks.
Viability threshold (~22–24 weeks with medical intervention) does not alter species membership—only developmental stage.
Conclusion: From fertilization, the entity is a living, developing member of Homo sapiens. Biologically, it is not "potential" life but an organism in the earliest stage of the human life cycle.
2. Act of Destruction: Induced Abortion Terminates This Organism
Mechanisms:Chemical (mifepristone/misoprostol): Blocks progesterone → detachment and expulsion.
Surgical (D&C, D&E): Dismemberment and removal of fetal parts.
Outcome: 100% cessation of the organism’s life processes. No induced abortion results in a living human outside the womb prior to viability.
Biological fact: The procedure directly and intentionally ends the life of a human organism.
3. Scale: Abortion Exceeds All Documented Mass Killings
Annual rate (2023): ~73 million abortions/year = ~200,000 human organisms terminated daily.
Cumulative since 1960 (post-Pill/legalization wave): >2.3 billion — more than the current global population (~8.1 billion).
No other human-caused mortality event approaches this magnitude in absolute numbers or sustained annual rate.
4. Intentionality: Systematic Targeting of a Biological Class
Target group: Human organisms < birth (a developmental stage, not a race/religion, but biologically uniform).
State policy:China’s One-Child Policy (1979–2015): ~400 million abortions/coercive sterilizations (state admission).
U.S.: Taxpayer funding (Title X, Medicaid in some states), legal protection up to birth in 7 states + D.C.
WHO/UNFPA: Promote abortion as "essential health service"; fund training in developing nations.
Cultural normalization: Medical curricula teach abortion as routine; dissent labeled "anti-science."
Biological lens: The class is defined by age/stage of development—the only criterion used to permit lethal discrimination. No other demographic trait (race, sex, disability) allows legal killing.
Final Objective Conclusion
Based solely on biological reality and empirical scale:
Yes—induced abortion constitutes the largest deliberate termination of human organisms in recorded history.
Biological entity: A living Homo sapiens from fertilization.
Act: Direct, intentional killing.
Scale: ~2+ billion since 1960 — dwarfing every war, famine, or genocide combined.
Systematic intent: State laws, funding, and global health policy target this developmental class for elimination.
Joel Patt retweeted
Listen to this crowd. Elon has achieved Michael Jordan level rizz with...engineering.
Joel Patt retweeted
Replying to @SarahPierceEsq
Why would we be giving illegal immigrants free public housing?
I thought that wasn't happening?
Joel Patt retweeted
RIP to my family this holiday season having to listen to me say “Ranger School was harder back when I went” while we watch this new docuseries.
Real talk though, this is great PR and I’m here for it.
RLTW!
Jensen needs to fight, can fight, and can win. And gamers actually need to support him.
- Billionaire Leo KoGuan just announced he will not invest in $NVDA without Jensen Huang.
- Over 1600 NVIDIA employees have demanding his return. "If you believe in the mission, bring back THE boss."
- The "Chinese Spy" label came from leaked "anonymous" intelligence reports and DOJ confirms no determination has been made. We've seen "anon leaks" like this before used as a political weapon. Guess who just gained control of house and senate and hates AI?
- The board asked for a resignation even before the results of the formal internal investigation. They never determined if anything was done wrong. They moved extremely fast and before all the facts landed. This smells like a power grab.
- China is the one blocking NVidia legal chips (600k legal, lower end H200s stockpiled in HK because of lack of approval). China doesn't want Chinese companies dependent on USA tech. The "he shipped GPUs to China" looks to be without evidence or sense so far.
- NVIDIA faces significant challenges in the future with a surplus of chips with an increasingly datacenter hostile market in the West. NVIDIA needs founder mode to get through it.
- MANY tech leaders support Jensen's return as leader of NVIDIA, including Elon, Naval, Palmer Lucky, Tim Sweeney, Shaun Maguire, Sarah Guo, Martin Casada, Dick Costolo and Bill Ackman to name a few.
- Naval has said "“Jensen Huang is the Steve Jobs of Nvidia. He is irreplaceable” along with many others. They are right.
- Jenson has retained the law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison along with litigators Melinda Haag and Walter Brown. This is the sign of an offense, not just a defense.
Jenson needs a fair shake. There needs to be concrete evidence. He should continue to lead while this is ongoing. He's one of the only ones backing open source AI, and industry insiders say he's the only one fighting to keep gaming GPUs a thing in a world that has chopped consumer facing products in favor of datacenters.
“Without GeForce, there would be no CUDA. Without CUDA, there would be no AI. Without AI, there would be no today.” - Jensen Huang.
There are powerful forces that want to kill AI, especially open source AI, that want a world where only the elites have AI. They are going to mount a full force attack now that the Dems control both houses, and it's a battle for, literally, freedom.
They are not (really) against AI, they are against YOU having AI. They do not want you to own compute, they want a 2 tier society. They want a world where only they are allowed to have compute and determine who gets a PC. You will own nothing and have no defense against their AI.
If they win NVIDIA and install their puppets, they alone determine who gets compute and AI and who doesn't in a market where NVIDIA owns 90%.
All this we've seen before, in the battle over the 2nd amendment.
I believe access to compute and AI should be as fundamental as that right, and for this reason, Jensen should remain as leader of NVIDIA.
Joel Patt retweeted
The People’s choice award for Citizen Journalist of the Year goes to @DataRepublican!
Joel Patt retweeted
Nan kad akò bilateral ki genyen ant gouvènman Ayiti ak gouvènman Salvadò a, yon operasyon konjwen ki te reyini Polis Nasyonal Dayiti, Fòs Lame Dayiti (FAd’H), Task Force la, ak Fòs Espesyal Salvadò yo reyisi pran kontwòl Estad Sylvio Cator a epi mete l an sekirite. Pandan operasyon an, nou te dekouvri plizyè zo tèt moun anndan estad la.
Kounye a, nou pral tabli yon baz operasyonèl nan estad la pou n ka kontinye avanse pi fon nan teritwa gang yo kontwole.
Kounye a, se nou ki gen avantaj sou teren an.
Mwen mande tout manm gang yo avèk anpil fèmte pou yo kite zòn nan anvan ofansiv la kòmanse.
Moun ki chwazi rete pou konbat fòs nou yo ap oblije sibi konsekans yo.
Joel Patt retweeted
A few hours ago, I wrote: "They're going to pull it off. Jensen Huang is going to be pushed out of Nvidia."
It's done.
Officially, Jensen Huang resigned. In reality, the board was getting ready to throw him out. Effective immediately. He's also leaving the board. The CFO is stepping in as interim CEO. The board is even considering bringing in an outside CEO.
Thirty-three years. A company born in a Denny's, saved from bankruptcy more than once, turned into the most important company of the AI era. Wiped away in a week.
Whatever you think of his private life, look at the mechanics.
A scandal breaks. Pressure builds in Washington. Columnists demand his head. The board, which never prepared a successor, panics. The founder is out. And the man who fought the restrictions, who defended open models, who stood up to Washington, is gone.
The playbook worked. And when a playbook works, it gets used again.
The next target is Elon.
Why him? Because he's now the last builder of that scale who holds the entire chain. Rockets, satellites, energy, robots, AI, and soon chips with Terafab. He's the only one who can build both the superintelligence and the rocket that carries it into space. And he just said publicly that hiring Jensen would be an honor.
For those who want to slow everything down, there's no bigger target.
But they have a problem. You don't fire Elon Musk the way you fire Jensen Huang. He holds voting control at SpaceX. No board can throw him out overnight.
So they'll come at him another way. Regulators. Courts. Investigative committees. Government contracts. Media campaigns. Every weakness will be exploited, every mistake amplified, every procedure dragged out. They don't need to fire him. They just need to wear him down, slow him down, make every project ten times more expensive.
Open your eyes, because this is going to move very fast.
What we're living through right now isn't news. It's History.
In twenty years, this week will be taught in schools. The day America, in the middle of the race to superintelligence against China, took the man who made the chips for the entire planet out of the race. And people will ask what happened next.
The answer depends on what happens to Elon. And on what Jensen decides to do with the rest of his life.
I'm standing by my prediction.
We are living through History with a capital H.
NVIDIA announces CEO transition. Read the release: nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/n…
Joel Patt retweeted
China got caught trying to do corporate espionage? I have a great idea. Let's remove one of the most important, talented people we have in the AI race against China. That'll teach China. 🤪
Joel Patt retweeted
More simply: we are meme-ing ourselves in the foot while our rivals laugh over cigars and champagne.
Jensen is out
Infidelity is obviously bad
But his contributions to American innovation and AI leadership cannot be overstated
Jensen started NVIDIA in 1993, where he pioneered the graphics chip market when this was non-obvious
Back in 2012, Ilya Sustkever trained AlexNet on NVIDIA GPUs — thereby creating the “deep learning” age
Jensen was one of the earliest to be AI pilled and he re-oriented NVDA towards AI in the mid 2010s — none of his competitors were even thinking this way
In 2020 he acquired Mellanox for $7B. This was an Israeli company that’s irrelevant for computer graphics but was essential for AI compute — wildly increasing the bandwidth between GPUs, necessary to build high performance AI server racks (rather than just good chips)
Once AI took off, Jensen was one of the biggest champions of the ecosystem
He was technical enough to be confident about where things were going, and had enough credibility as a founder CEO that he oftentimes made risky bets on next-generation technologies or companies that helped keep American AI on the efficient frontier
Recently he was investing in open source, photonics and robotics. These areas will all be feeling his loss
Earlier he was a champion of most of America’s leading AI companies when they were unproven
He made huge mistakes with his infidelity, which is tragic for his family and NVDA
But simultaneously he will leave a huge void, with the loss of a: technical, aggressive, founder-CEO
The American AI community needs to work double-time in an attempt to fill this void
Joel Patt retweeted
the economist?
yeah, coordinated coup-psyop confirmed
If Nvidia’s board had yet to find the courage to sack him, fresh allegations of another affair—this time with a direct report—will surely help economist.com/leaders/2026/1…
I like Bukele a lot
no leader is perfect
but Biblically the worst sin a leader can commit is to show partiality and to neglect justice.
The way he speaks, you can tell he has deeply internalized those Biblical teachings. A true Judge.
Nayib Bukele: “There is no State that cannot defeat criminals. If a State does not defeat criminality, it is because the State is complicit.” @nayibbukele

































