🚨 🇬🇧 𝐂𝐔𝐋𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐄 𝐖𝐀𝐑- 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐦: 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐘𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐔𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐢𝐞𝐠𝐞. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐁𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐬. 📕 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐁𝐎𝐎𝐊 𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐄𝐃 👇 Culture War explores the thirty year siege of unionism, and the fightback which has begun. Part 1 of the book over eight chapters analyses the constitutionally corrosive impact of the Belfast Agreement, the Irish Sea border and nationalism’s relentless targeting of unionist/loyalist culture from Drumcree (which is the focus of an entire chapter as a case study on parading) to the more recent attack on the flying of Union flags and bonfires. It further devotes a chapter to illuminating the political agenda behind nationalism’s divisive Irish Language campaign. There is a detailed chapter contribution by Ulster University academic Dr Cillian McGrattan (writing in a personal capacity) who, using legacy as a case study, presents a clinical evidence-based exposure of the ‘greening’ of academia and how a small cohort of nationalists have managed to completely control academic output and skew it to suit nationalism’s political agenda. The book also looks at the structural bias within much of the professional class- in particular within media and the legal profession-and how this has been influenced by a strategic nationalist insurgency to ‘green’ important opinion-forming institutions. Importantly, Part 2 of the book in three chapters provides the tools for fighting back, explaining the basic outline of Human Rights law and Judicial Review, and how this can be used to defend and advance unionist/loyalist rights. Culture War is also now available in a number of local shops, and can be purchased in both paperback and hardback directly via Amazon which is the easiest place to order: amzn.eu/d/02HSqtXG

Wonder are SDLP regretting being footsoldiers in the PIRA/Dissident mob as yet?

Gregory Campbell told @williamcrawley that SF would resign Ministers and that would cause a “collapse”. This is just wrong. He needs to go and read section 18 (9), (10) and (11) of the 1998 Act. The DUP are repeating legally illiterate nonsense.

Why would they? Given the weakness of the DUP leadership, they know they can do what they want.

🚨 The arguments being made by those in the DUP arguing for sustaining the lawless Michelle O’Neill in office are without any foundation in law or reality. Here are the facts, debunking each one of the arguments being made 👇

We have reached levels of comical desperation within nationalism.

The mobsters interviewed two by two…

.@timcairns made an important point with which I agree. @GRobinsonDUP is a fundamentally decent person. He is a nice guy. He’s not malicious or nasty. He is not the problem. It’s others, and everyone knows who they are. They are those whose personal interest binds them to sustaining a lawless mobster in office at all costs.

The DUP’s arguments for sustaining Michelle O’Neill in office are devoid of any legal or principled foundation. They are legally illiterate, and collapse under the most elementary scrutiny unionistvoice.co.uk/news/the…

Unionism can unite around at least one issue: There must be profound consequences for the lawless chief mobster who has defied the rule of law & led an anti-human rights campaign against 35 lawful peaceful Orangemen. Follow that to its logic conclusion, and it’s a fallacy to believe the endpoint of delivering such consequences is not ejecting her from office.

Carla Lockhart has led unionism politically through Drumcree. Where she goes, the grassroots unionist/loyalist community will follow. She has shown integrity, consistency and clarity. The DUP would do well to listen to her.

Jon Burrows doesn’t understand the legal effect of resigning the DFM. He thinks it “collapses Stormont” and “leads to direct rule”. This is legally illiterate.

The whole case for the DUP continuing to sustain the lawless mobster has collapsed on the View. Jim Allister is now literally telling Gavin Robinson off, with Gavin sitting with the head down (and rightly so given what they’ve done), live on TV. There is no unionist who can credibly defend the DUP’s weakness.