lol the guy defending Chinese propaganda bans me for posting a whinnie the poo gif
yea thanks for proving me point @JapanLittleBoy
162
This has been true since it came out and its temporary.
Is he really trying to pass this off as a release for today?
Replying to @thsottiaux
Fully included in the Pro plan, doesn't draw on your weekly usage.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
As of 22 October 2026, OpenAI’s dots are unavailable to ChatGPT Pro users in the EU. OpenAI excludes the European Economic Area (which includes all EU countries), the UK and Switzerland from Pro access.
[Source: OpenAI documentation](learn.chatgpt.com/docs/dots)
217
Struggling mightily with this because your dot can't approve things on your behalf in another thread apparently??
@thsottiaux @pvncher
Update on using dot as a Hermes front end: it connects to Anya, my personal Hermes agent, who can consult Charles, my business agent. Email and task tools work; attachments and scheduled sending are enabled. Still ironing out record changes, voice, and tool discovery.
1
289
JimRat retweeted
Replying to @MiaAI_lab
This is not a rebuttal. It is a cleanup statement.
You are not disproving the trail.
You are confirming pieces of it one by one and trying to downgrade each one into an innocent explanation.
zurih was in the history? husband
credits were missing? agent
credits were buried? agent
repos matched? Stefan agent
attribution got fixed after people called it out? oversight
book monetisation? free market
criticism? hit piece
At some point "every single receipt has an innocent explanation" stops being a rebuttal and starts looking like a script.
And the credit excuse is the weakest part.
You cant just demand prominent attribution from other people, quote license clauses at forks, then suddenly become helpless in your own repos because an agent wrote the README.
That aint consistency...thaat is one standard for everyone else and another for yourself.
And this is not one missing name.
People are now showing:
byte identical files
authors disappearing from history
rehosted models
credits buried hundreds of lines down
original creators reduced to "informed"
Then after it blows up, suddenly credits are being "fixed".
That doesnt erase the history lol it confirms there was something to fix...
And the "nobody messaged me" line is bullshit too.
Public attribution should not depend on every original creator personally knocking on your door asking not to be buried...if the work came from them CREDIT them properly from the start.
Simple.
The funniest part is that this statement still does not answer the hardest questions.
Why did 31 files match @Tech2Wild byte for byte?
Why was his role softened to "informed"?
Why were creators named deep in READMEs while Mia branding stayed front and center?
Why were repos and credits being changed after people started auditing them?
Why does attribution suddenly become "agent error" only when the missing credit benefits you?
Those are the questions.
Everything else in that statement is noisey bs.
And no, "my husband", "my agent", "Stefans agent" is not evidence it is a story after you pretended it was a "nothing burger" as all of your AI Bot swarm have been pushing on everyones posts, so go ddamn obvious.
You want this finished?
Show the source trail.
Show the permissions.
Show the commit provenance.
Show the attribution history.
Show the receipts that contradict the public evidence.
Until then, this is not a debunk.
It is an explanation for why the receipts keep existing.
Update on using dot as a Hermes front end: it connects to Anya, my personal Hermes agent, who can consult Charles, my business agent. Email and task tools work; attachments and scheduled sending are enabled. Still ironing out record changes, voice, and tool discovery.










