
Vanguard Defense @Harvard - Prev. @northropgrumman @MITLL
LA
Joined January 2021
- Tweets12.4K
- Following4.8K
- Followers4.2K
- Likes19.9K
I have a feeling there's a high likelihood no one will have enough grit in the future to do anything because you can simply inject things to get results
Proud to be a *small* supporter
kled now works with almost every frontier lab.
we now exclusively sell consumer data, directly from our opt in consumer data collection app.
we stripped everything else off the marketplace today: kled.ai/datasets.
Johnny Ni retweeted
On Thursday we were happy to host Under Secretary of War and former HRC President Emil Michael.
Our discussion covered super intelligence, the threat of effective altruism, and the case for American optimism.
Bad day to be a clay pigeon
The Dúnedain were a small group of Rangers who defended the North, often without recognition.
We hosted our first Strider Dúnedain Day at the Range yesterday. Had a great group of founders building in national security for an afternoon of trap shooting with our team!
I left feeling optimistic about the people who care deeply about this country and the tech they’re building to help defend it. Already looking forward to the next one. 🙌
Johnny Ni retweeted
Warhound, the brain child of Ben Lamm and Palmer Luckey, emerges from stealth to genetically engineer dogs for military and law enforcement.
spr.ly/6011BHZNMF
Got some buddies dropped out of Harvard building a sick AI startup, super cool work, they're in stealth, backed with 8-figures in seed from top investors, looking to bring in great SWEs & AI/ML Engineers, comp beats industry, dm if interested.
Johnny Ni retweeted
We’re proud to welcome Robinhood Ventures Fund I (NYSE: RVI) as an investor, and glad to have their retail investors with us as we scale our Bank for America’s innovation economy.
Robinhood Ventures Fund I (RVI) has invested $30M in @ereborbank, a bank building for the next generation of American innovation.
Learn more: rbnhd.co/rvi-erebor
Johnny Ni retweeted
If you’re building a data vendor and not focused obsessively on scalability and durability you’re ngmi
I was just pitched a mini interceptor firework system for your backyard against rats how will HOA respond to this
You would think people would do more diligence into what LPs are backing which funds….
Valar is good for America
Day One is bad for America.
These things were true when Day One wrote their first check. Neither is here nor there however in this dispute as framed by Isaiah. Instead the framing is purely about contractual rights so that is how I will comment on it.
Venture is a hard business. A very hard business. 75% of firms shouldn’t exist and won’t in the next cycle. There will be a new crop behind them and 75%+ of those will also fail.
For some firms when they find the rare winner in their portfolio, they NEED to double down on that winner to build the returns that will justify their continued existence.
Hence the existence of pro rata RIGHTS. The pre negotiated right to invest more money and maintain ownership.
We can argue all day long about whether the right should be standard. I for one feel like we should earn our position on cap tables through work and good partnership. However, the argument over “should” is irrelevant when the right has already been negotiated and agreed upon.
In theory when those rights exist, they’ve already been bought and paid for. The valuation assumes the existence of pro-rata rights in the number. The shares purchased are worth X without pro-rata rights and are worth X+Y with pro-rata rights. When an investor pays X+Y, they're relying on the value of Y. Having Y deleted by the company and other investors is… frustrating to say the least. Having it deleted when it’s your biggest career winning investment is doubly so. Having it deleted when it’s your biggest career winner while other investors are permitted to exercise their pro-rata is devastating.
(Now as I said, Day One is bad for America and I think they should have never been allowed to invest but we have no magic wand so here we are talking about contractual rights instead of FOCI concerns for a business working in a strategic field and hoping to sell to USG).
When you strip those rights away ex post, you are literally stripping value out of the fund who purchased those rights.
If you don’t want to honor pro-rata rights, dont include them when you raise the round. The only thing worse than re-trading a deal is re-trading a deal that was closed years ago.
Again, I generally agree that pro rata rights and spring back rights should be reconsidered generally and that firms should earn the right to continue to invest. I’ll also acknowledge that the fact the rights can be waived means that when all agreed to the rights existence waiver was always a possibility that should have also been priced in. That said, the existence of the rights in the first place set expectations and expectations are important. My word is my bond. Honoring one’s commitments is important. It’s what American enterprise is based on.
If this conflict ends up with Masha being expunged from the cap table I’m happy as an American but as someone who plays in a brutally competitive business, fights hard for my portfolio, and plays by the rules with integrity, it kills my soul to see an argument like this laid out for re-trading deals. It’s terrible for the ecosystem and it’s not a good look for anyone.
Mean what you say and say what you mean. (And partner with good people). That’s how we win 🇺🇸
Johnny Ni retweeted
.@DiscipulusVent Demo Day starting soon.



























