I’m going to be able to refute their 1000 page brane paper in every dimension as soon as they publish it extremely easily. I’m about one to two years ahead of millions of super intelligence tokens and a team of physicists, while using zero ai. A lot of it they can’t even calculate and prove in lean.
Ai just continually sliming the fuck out of science with total slop. This is a massively criminal disaster.
*After spending hours and hours on the calculations for the Navier stokes proof and you find out it blows up at 10^10 times the size of the observable universe and you realize it is total made up nonsense ai brain slime garbage.
It’s Palantir, Andruil, and Oracle vs. the ai->si demonic p(gooners).
youtu.be/CIrvSJwwJUE?is=51Iz…
Palantir CEO Alex Karp says the AI labs want you to buy into a future where you:
"Have no job, adversaries win, and everybody who does win is a small, tiny group of people living in a tiny place that believe because they eat vegetables and don't support war fighters, they deserve to have the total means of production of this country—and the rest of us should just sit back and absorb the cost of that revolution, which we're paying for."
Can’t report bugs anymore. Without ai prohibition, I give society less than 3 years before total social and economic collapse.
cyberscoop.com/openai-ai-gen…
I’m starting a new company today Brad, and the regulatory stipulations I’m proposing are I can kill 50 people and steal 999 million dollars before the regulations kick in.
techcrunch.com/2026/10/20/an…
I’m starting to believe these ai companies are purposely writing these papers in such a way that it becomes extremely difficult to check, and they aren’t telling people that lean verification is flawed. We were making a joke about a graph toy model in time as a joke and Open ai and anthropic stole it and duct taped an infinite dimensional time theory on top of this toy and everyone is running around like they solved something. It cannot be proven and I believe they are doing this on purpose to run you down rabbit holes for a gaslighting pr stunt. If they don’t come clean about the flaws of what they are doing, the flaws of lean verification and modeling, I’m going to sue them for fraud, criminal scientific negligence, extortion and anything else I can make stick. I’ve reached by bullshit tolerance limit.
Qwen neurons is the newest ai company gaslighting pr stunt that’s also fraud. These neurons jump all around all the time and deviate far away from what they claim they do. It’s more ai gaslighting bullshit. I’m so fucking sick of exposing this shit for what it is.
Rivers retweeted
Replying to @eth_sensei @vardi
Everytime someone invokes lean in an absolute argument, I’m invoking the search for Bobby Fischer clause.
Gotta stay on your toes in the 21st milennium…
New Post: Secret Unified Physics Slop
math.columbia.edu/~woit/word…
They are probably going to say scientists built a room temp quantum computer tomorrow, but this is a selective light transmitter that imbues the bands with statistical information for sensing. It does not perform advanced algorithmic computations. It’s actually a pretty useful sensor but it can’t compute.
nature.com/articles/s41586-0…
Apparently celebrities are promoting L space but don’t even know what L space is, which is flattering to the mathematics community but falls short of understanding reality. “Supporting the guy whom makes people impoverished” is the extra teaspoon of criminal extortion by people whom don’t have any clue what’s actually going on.
The majority of colleagues from all major academic institutions have been comprised by ai brain slime and are incapable of addressing the flaws of their arguments and are now stonewalling all across the board. We are on our own. Trust nothing they or ai companies or p(goons) publish anymore. We are indefinitely in full academic martial law.
Professor, IonQ, and IBM take aim at classical residual greedy selection.
Suggests eventual advantage with high registers and shallow depth.
arxiv.org/abs/2610.15586
















