You've dismissed the possibility that Tyler Robinson's defense—which the state is paying for—might not have the usual motivations to win their case this time. Okay. But rather than rely on what the state-funded defense is doing or not doing, consider debunking Candace Owens's reporting directly. No, don't debunk her "theories." Debunk her reporting. Explain why her facts, not her hypotheses (which change, as they should, when new evidence comes in) are incorrect. Because here's the thing. The public isn't buying the state's case against Tyler Robinson. And what the shills and useful idiots seem to be doing is deflecting. They're also pretending to forget that the state has the burden of proof. The public sees this. The shills and useful idiots for the state are not coming off as truthful. They're coming off as shills and useful idiots for the state. And some of us remember what the state is capable of.