JustExtreme retweeted
Rape.
What's the real reason why Russell Brand was convicted??
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Russell Brand was convicted by a jury of one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault against four women between 2004 and 2009. He was sentenced to 10 years and 6 months in prison.
theguardian.com/uk-news/live/2…
cnn.com/2026/11/09/ent…
independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
JustExtreme retweeted
“Please let me say this very clearly: all other misogynists in comedy, we are coming for you, and I hope you never sleep again.”
Comedian @JosieLong joins Novara Live to share her personal experience of working with Russell Brand after the former comedian was sentenced to more than 10 years in jail for rape and sexual assault.
Watch her full takedown of the culture that protected and enabled Brand on our YouTube channel.
The Media has to stop contriving ways to blame the crimes of men on women.
• Dad a molester - blame the daughter
• Husband an abuser - blame the wife
• Boss a serial harasser - blame his secretary
The crimes of these men are their crimes alone. Stop transferring blame.
JustExtreme retweeted
The real ones hated rapist Russell Brand before they even knew
Here's Stewart Lee absolutely dragging Brand during his Big Brother days
JustExtreme retweeted
The nation has been left stunned after a man who got a tax payer-funded BBC chauffeur to pick up his 16-year-old girlfriend from school when he was 29 years old has turned out to be a rapist. I mean where were the signs?
The man in question is attempted comedian Russell Brand—someone who mysteriously carved out a TV and movie career despite not being remotely funny or likeable. If you don’t know who I’m talking about, Brand is the one who always looks like he’s pissing on railway lines. Yes, he’s the ex-husband of the first woman to take a joy ride in space!
Brand ended his marriage to Katy Perry when the allegations against him first emerged. He then became a Youtuber so he could convince people that the eventual court case was an establishment stitch up. This argument would’ve been more convincing if he’d found a single person to defend his character in court.
Brand conveniently discovered that he loved Jesus and started carrying a Bible everywhere he went. This was definitely not for the cameras. He was interviewed by Piers Morgan who asked him which Bible passages were most meaningful to him. Unfortunately, he couldn’t answer. At least he’ll have plenty of time to spend with his booky wook in prison.
Brand actually thought he was gonna be redemeed, saying he could “feel God’s presence” while walking into court. He told his social media followers the prayers seemed to be working. Unfortunately for him, God doesn’t like rapists any more than the jury did.
After falling silent while the prosecution cross-examined him on why he kept groping women without their consent, and forcing himself on them, he was convicted of rape and three counts of sexual assault. This came as a huge surprise to everyone who’d looked the other way for the past 25 years.
Brand will no doubt be delighted to find that many prison inmates share his disregard for consent. I’m sure he won’t object if his big strong cellmate decides he just can’t help himself.
Brand’s sex crimes were so well-known that his fellow comedians called him out on stage for years before the law caught up with him. It’s not like he kept any of this a secret. He bragged about his rapes and sexual assaults in a book that reached number 1 in the Sunday Times best sellers list and was widely praised by critics. He was declared Shagger of the Year three times by the Sun newspaper.
His management enrolled him in a sex addiction clinic where he was asked to draw up a list of all the women he’d wronged. He compared the process to Saddam Hussein being asked about individual kurds he’d killed. In a follow-up memoir, he wrote of his time in the “nicky wick”, “If this is what I’m telling you, can you imagine what’s being left out?”
Brand was so confident of his crimes that he laughed on the radio about how he indecently exposed himself to women. He even offered to send his naked assistant to one man during an interview—the man in question was Sir Jimmy Saville.
Brand caused a public outcry in 2008 when he called 78-year-old Andrew Sachs for his BBC Radio 2 show with Jonathan Woss. The incident was pre-recorded and producers decided it was fine to air. During the call, Brand said, “I shagged your granddaughter”, made a mock apology to Sachs, and then suggested he commit suicide.
Since humiliating old people counts as entertainment in the UK, both men continued to have successful TV careers and Brand even starred in a couple of terrible Hollywood movies. It’s funny how rapists fail upwards, isn’t it?
Brand is just the latest in a long line of people to follow the proud BBC tradition of sexual offences. They include Sir Jimmy Saville, Rolf Harris CBE, Stuart Hall OBE, Huw Edwards MBE, Chris Denning, and Tim Westwood. You’ll be pleased to know the BBC did their utmost to shelter these men for years until the law caught up with them. Aren’t you glad you’re forced to pay your licence fee?
JustExtreme retweeted
In the last Labour manifesto they promised to restore development spending to 0.7% of GNI when possible.
Last year they cut the target to 0.3% - going further than even the Tories.
Surely stage one of any 'reset' is restoring the funding they've slashed?
Burnham to launch 'debt reset' for Commonwealth nations - after opening door to slavery apology lbc.co.uk/article/burnham-de…
JustExtreme retweeted
“I received direct threats targeting me on my phone from the Mossad, from the Israelis, and they threatened to kill me.”
Lebanese journalist Amal Khalil speaking before she was killed by Israel.
JustExtreme retweeted
This is an important new paper.
When we allocate responsibility for emissions, it's normally in terms of consumption. We tally up direct household emissions (eg, from household energy use) plus the emissions embodied in all the stuff that a household consumes.
But this creates a problem, because households do not control the conditions under which that stuff is produced. The energy and production techniques, which determine the emissions content of goods and services, is decided by those who own the means of production - mostly the capitalist class, and to some extent governments.
Scholars have argued that owners should therefore be held responsible for emissions from production they control, given they have the power to produce differently, such as by using renewable energy, or by investing in less damaging forms of production.
When we account for private ownership-based emissions, together with government ownership-based emissions and direct household emissions, the richest 1% are responsible for 30% of global emissions, and the richest 10% are together responsible for a staggering 60%.
These are the people who are driving climate breakdown. Climate change is class war.
But these results should be understood as conservative. I would argue that even direct household emissions should be assessed at least in part in terms of energy-system ownership. When households cook or heat water for showers, they usually have little control over the source of the energy, i.e., whether it is fossil fuels or renewables. That is decided by the people who own the energy system.
The fact that so much of our energy system is still provided by fossil fuels is not the fault of the working classes, it is the fault of those who own and control the energy system - which is mostly capitalists, and to some extent governments (which are in turn often captured by the capitalist class).
So households may be responsible for the quantity of energy they use, but they cannot reasonably be held responsible for the additional emissions produced by fossil-fuel sources if renewable sources could be provided instead. Perhaps one methodological solution here would be to allocate emissions to households *as if* their energy use was provided by currently available renewables, and allocate the rest to the owners of the energy system.
The paper is by @lucas_chancel and Yannic Rehm in Nature Climate Change: nature.com/articles/s41558-0…
JustExtreme retweeted
Why did our ruling class not invest in decarbonising faster to avoid this acceleration in deadly heatwaves that scientists warned would come? Because of the capitalist law of value.
Capital invests in what is most profitable to capital, rather than what is most necessary for humanity, so our ruling class keeps ploughing investment into fossil fuels and SUVs, while we get far too little in renewables and public transit, even while the world burns around us.
We have more than enough capacity (labour, factories, technology) to address the climate crisis, but as long as capital controls investment and production we are prevented from doing it.
We are trapped by the capitalist law of value, living in a miserable shadow of the world we could have.
JustExtreme retweeted
"The climate crisis cannot be addressed within capitalism. It is vital that we understand this fact and develop our strategies accordingly, otherwise we are headed for certain failure. And failure is not an option." jasonhickel.substack.com/p/c…
JustExtreme retweeted
It’s wild that Wimbledon has a ban on showing the nationality of Russian players, but Israeli players face no such restriction. If you’re going to have bans at least be consistent, otherwise it feels like genocide denialism with strawberries and cream.
JustExtreme retweeted
Yes, I'm politicising Ann Widdecombe's death against police advice, but it gives me the perfect excuse to add credibility to my story about needing the £5 million bribe for security.
JustExtreme retweeted
Nigel Farage is the son of a stockbroker who went to Dulwich College before becoming an investment banker himself.
He owns 5 homes and has spent most his adult life working as a politician, first as an MEP and now as an MP.
He is the establishment.
JustExtreme retweeted
Pull yourself together. He won a landslide victory, and then immediately betrayed his main promises, betrayed the working class, and then went on to participate in a genocide. He deserves contempt and punishment.
Keir Starmer led our party from the brink, back to power. He won a landslide victory, which few in our party's history have done before. That achievement will never be forgotten. In office, he put us on the path to the change we promised at the last election. A devoted and dedicated public servant, we owe him our deepest thanks.
JustExtreme retweeted
Starmer’s legacy is genocide. He provided military and intelligence support to Israel as it perpetrated the crime of crimes against the Palestinian people. That is how he will be remembered.
JustExtreme retweeted
I have written to the Health Secretary to call for a change in miscarriage care.
Families shouldn't have to endure repeated loss before accessing care, tests and treatments that could prevent another miscarriage.
It’s time we consider a more compassionate approach - Tommy’s Graded Model offers a hopeful way forward.
@tommys
JustExtreme retweeted
Replying to @Steve_Laws_
Hi Steve:
You support 'remigration' for everyone you deem to be of non-British heritage.
So for clarity:
You would have deported Henry Nowak, wouldn't you?
JustExtreme retweeted
A request for help.
Steve Laws demands all Sikhs are deported after Henry Nowak's murder.
But he supports deporting everyone with "non-British" heritage.
Henry Nowak had Polish heritage.
Would you have deported Henry Nowak?
I keep asking.
He won't answer.
So please ask him
This quoted post is unavailable.
JustExtreme retweeted
8 years ago I found a lump and contacted my GP. Same day appointment, ultrasound within days, all clear.
Now I have a lump which has several red flag signs for cancer. 8 day wait for a GP to look at it. The wait is wrecking my mental health.
The #NHS has been broken for profit.
JustExtreme retweeted
I've just come home from visiting my wife in hospital following major surgery. The medical team have done an incredible job and we’re extremely grateful.
But this surgery was after a 3 year wait and 3 cancellations. Last time they sent her home on the day of her operation.
So when Streeting claims he's done wonders for the NHS, stories like my wife's are the reality. He can fight the doctors and fudge the numbers but our stories don't lie























