Democrats can hold power for years if they focus.
Propose laws that lower the cost of housing, health care, and groceries through more competition and less red tape, without price controls.
Spur free market growth that reaches working families and small businesses, not just the wealthy elite.
Aggressively rein in tariffs.
Cut off spending for needless wars.
Enforce the border without the cruelty.
Investigate corruption, fraud, and Epstein, and hold any administration official who broke the law accountable.
But if they start packing the Court, adding states to gain Senate seats, or moving toward open borders, they’ll quickly feel the rubber band effect. They should resist that.
Who is this idiot broadcasting the Jets-Raiders game saying they should have punted instead of taking a 53-yd FG to take a 5 point lead. One of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard on a broadcast.
Edited as I’ve learned it was Jonathan Vilma. Totally braindead.
Canceled my pre-order of GTA VI after seeing the launch trailer today.
Not really but I see others getting engagement from rage-baiting like this so I thought I'd do the same.
The tagline for Nike’s Caitlin Clark campaign is “Nothing special to see here.”
They used to make their athletes feel superhuman. Their campaigns were inspiring. Now it’s just hokey sarcasm. What the hell is going on at that company.
Miami is about to have a cultural renaissance.
John Leguizamo has been cast as the villain for Joseph Kosinski's ‘MIAMI VICE’ movie.
Also starring Michael B. Jordan and Austin Butler.
(Source: hollywoodreporter.com/movies…)
The people of Massachusetts should be totally ashamed of their legal system. It's a total mess. Corrupt to the core.
Retry all you want, Lindsay Clancy will never be found guilty. The burden the state has is impossible to meet. There is a mountain of reasonable doubt.
The only way anyone can find her guilty is by ignoring the law.
So it's 11-1 for not guilty and the 1 holdout is not following the law.
As I posted last week, the ONLY way for this jury to reach a guilty verdict on Lindsay Clancy is to ignore the law.
I assume people who want to repeal the 19th amendment are also on board with women opting out of paying taxes.
You know, @NancyMace, just because you're invited on a tv show to talk about a topic you know nothing about, you don't have to accept.
The amount of misinformation being spewed by a (thankfully) former elected "leader" is truly scary.
Ridiculously cool move by @RockstGames to have all their GTA VI devs posting about the extended look.
Have a very strong feeling that Jason will be a beloved character and doofuses like this will act like they never said this dumb shit. But hey congrats on the engagement.
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
Disproving insanity beyond a reasonable doubt, which the Lindsay Clancy prosecutors must do, is literally impossible. I don’t care how many psychologists you parade up there, it’s impossible to know what’s going on in a person’s mind. From an evidentiary standpoint, if even one qualified expert testifies that she was not criminally responsible (which they have) then that is reasonable doubt and the only way to vote guilty is to disregard the law.
Can’t see 12 people doing that.
Have read several posts saying a Lindsay Clancy not guilty verdict will open the door for more moms to kill their kids.
Setting aside the asininity of that claim, it should be noted that this already happens more often than you'd think. We only know about Lindsay Clancy because she survived her suicide attempt. Had she not, there would not be a trial and we would not know her name, just as we don't know about the other moms who are misdiagnosed and mistreated by our mental health system and who successfully commit suicide.
What will open the door for more moms to kill their kids is to deny the existence and severity of PPD. It's to continue to send moms home from a psychiatric visit with a prescription for an SSRI (or ketamine, in the case of Tranyelle Harshman) and link to a mental health website and no follow-up plan.
Lindsay Clancy is going to be found not criminally responsible and people are going to freak out, because they have not watched the trial.
There's this idea that she needs to prove she was insane at the time of the killing. Just the opposite. The state has to prove--beyond a reasonable doubt--she was not. Not only have they not come close to meeting that very high burden, they have relied on shoddy testimony and have acted unethically throughout the trial.
I feel for this jury. They are required to follow the law, and when they do so they will be villainized for it.
I really don’t want GTA VI spoiled, but I’m afraid it’s inevitable at this point. I know people are starving for content but we’re 5 days away from the extended look, who really cares to see more than that? Just play the game.




