Kai

Hey @kaspaunchained core devs! Have you checked out Google's Fairwind Program for defensive security auditing? Vetted projects get access to frontier AI like Gemini 4 Argon (with unmitigated defensive testing) to scan and harden code. If you are on the core team, DM me! I can submit an internal nomination to try getting $KAS fast-tracked into the vetting queue. 🔒🛡️ Or you can apply directly here: deepmind.google/fairwind-pro…. @michaelsuttonil @WellerOlaf

No matter how much you try later to wash your shitcoin to look better, you can't undo unfair launch. This is one of the few facts that you can't retroactively change. This is exactly why $XRP can never be on the same league of $KAS (for instance) even if their market cap reaches 1 trillion someday. shitcoin.watch/vs/kas-xrp

If only superior tech, research and roadmap could move market cap, $KAS has no contender and would be #1 by now. The current bottleneck is distribution, effective marketing and industry adoption. I want to believe Kaspa will break through soon and receives the attention it deserves. The miners and retails have limits.

Man never forgot his $KAS community and did not go for the prize & recognition from Binance. The stance was clear - either you list Kaspa or nothing.

KCC-20 is shaping up to be a massive catalyst for $KAS. Bringing native stablecoins to L1 opens the floodgates for real-world payments, DeFi, and deep liquidity. Once stablecoins are live on the network, what’s your prediction for Kaspa's first true killer app?

Engineering and building a product is less of a moat now. The real moat is distribution and marketing—an area where I think $KAS is seriously lacking. Long gone are the days when a well-engineered product could sell itself without serious marketing. Now that building is cheap, there is a ton of noise in the product space.

$ZKAS inherited kaspa:native's superior tech, plus the added zcash:native like privacy by default, which sends it to the "Goldcoin" territory with some red flags: shitcoin.watch/ZKAS. I like the initiative and the fact that the KAS miners are getting benefited from this, but I particularly don't like the red flags and the fact that this is new chart having separate incentives from Kaspa.

The number was bit off in my previous post about $KAS miner fee, its roughly $3K per month, not year (If someone has more precise figure, please correct me). But it still holds that its low.

Among 236 rated tokens in shitcoin.watch, top 2 coins with the least red flags: 1. $BTC 2. $KAS

So what I heard it seems like a chicken-and-egg problem for kaspa:native. It's fairly launched and not VC-backed, but most T-1 exchanges demand a bribe of ~5% supply just to list a project. Does that mean every project listed by them went through this bribing process? If so, how can Kaspa win this battle if this is the "industry norm"? I understand the system is broken, but what's the strategy here? Sure, one argument is Kaspa will become so big they will be forced to list it, or they will need Kaspa rather than the opposite. But without distribution (exchange listings) and industry adoption, Kaspa can't get big. Emission rate is drying up and miners' fees are getting lower every month. To me, it seems like a deadlock situation. Thoughts?

Uncomfortable kaspa:native number: by shitcoin.watch/KAS estimate the network pays about $3k a year in fees. That's against a ~$1.2B market cap. Fast and cheap is the point. But miners earn almost entirely from emissions, and emissions shrink every month. When block rewards get small, fees have to pay for security. At today's usage they can't. Kaspa either needs higher fees or a lot more real transactions.