Henosis (@Kipunada) header
Henosis (@Kipunada) profile picture

Eternal Metamorphosis ἐγώ εἰμι θεία Oυσία

Joined May 2012
An almost perfect equilateral triangle alignment between Earth, Venus and Mars occurred today. Last such alignment was on ~15th Dec. 2024 and before on ~8th Dec. 2023. Mag. 7.3 EQ. occurred on 17/12/24, 7.1 on 7/12/23 and a 6.8 today. Next such alignment to occur on 5/2/27.
1
3
110
Bitcoin and US liquidity update
1
1
137
Bitcoin and US liquidity.
1
2
147
Over the past 60 years Earth's length of day has increased by about 35s but that trend has changed recently (2020) and length of day has since decreased slightly.
2
121
Average earthquake depth. Magnitude 6 and above. Is there a 17 year cycle?
1
4
260
Change in length of day and earthquake magnitude.
1
2
98
SPX adjusted for currency in circulation.
3
112
It's (almost) all about "the printer".
2
3
30
2,444
Global liquidity
1
1
125
Global liquidity vs Bitcoin update
86
The reversal in long-term yields has been attributed to - inflation/tariff concerns - debt concerns - growth revisions while these may be at play, @arebucci1 and I offer another perspective in a new VoxEU note: weak central bank demand for US Treasuries (link at end) 🧵 1/8
19
66
14
280
57,255
Weekend thoughts on markets. How the debt ceiling & the TGA will impact liquidity and financial markets in Q1 2025. I read a lot about this topic this weekend and thought it would be good to summarize my thoughts. Let’s jump right in. As of January 2nd, the US government will not be allowed to take on additional debt. Currently, the Treasury General Account (TGA), i.e., the US Treasury‘s bank account at the Fed, stands at 735bn USD. (1/x)
26
69
13
473
97,594
The Japanification of China: This has to be a contender for the chart of 2024 (30y bond yields).
28
199
37
744
144,266
Fed’s 2% inflation target is no more. It’s a form of gaslighting at this stage. Economy is annualizing 2.7% ish PCE and there is some right tail risks. 5y5y fwd breakevens is 2.59% 5y10y is 2.57% Dec cut odds are 77% then odds of cut in Jan is just a quarter, then March is a coin toss. QT likely to be terminated in Q1, even if they are not saying it publicly yet. So JPOW’s inflation battle is over without it being fully won yet. Ofc, Fed could get bailed out with a large equity market correction with consequent inflation numbers and market expectations trending lower, closer to the 2% by Q1. But as things stand today, it’s a no happy end job.
38
43
4
502
59,995
🚨🚨 New from me, joint with @Nouriel 🚨🚨 ATI: Activist Treasury Issuance and the Tug-of-War over Monetary Policy How Treasury's issuance policies have stimulated markets and the economy and blocked the Fed's efforts to restrain growth and inflation tinyurl.com/ykmpps49 /1
49
154
94
559
402,768
It's possible the next round of QE will not show up on the Fed's balance sheet Instead, it could be carried out by banks themselves Here's how a change to banks leverage rules could bail out the US government 🧵👇🏼 The US Government currently owes $34 trillion - not including interest. For every dollar they borrowed in the past, they have to borrow more dollars today to pay it back when it matures. And for every dollar they borrow today to pay back old maturing debt, they have to borrow even more in the future. Basically, the debt has to grow if they don't want the whole fiat system to collapse. But, the problem is that the economy does not have a limitless supply of dollars to loan the government. Sometimes, the dollars run out. If we rewind the clock to the last time the dollars ran out, it was 2019. The US government had spent the last few years borrowing and spending like crazy. On the backs of the Trump tax cuts and increases in government spending, the deficit exploded. By September of 2019, the economy did not have any dollars left to loan to the government. In fact, banks did not even have enough dollars to loan to each other. This caused the repo market to almost collapse in September of 2019. Banks went to each other in overnight markets to get cash from each other, and realized they were all trying to do the same thing. Nobody had any cash. They all had assets (treasuries) but no cash. So the overnight cost for cash exploded, and banks were at risk of collapse. This was a liquidity crisis. Without overnight funding, banks would face overnight collapse. Obviously the Fed wanted to avoid this, so they intervened. When the Fed intervened in the repo market, they said it "wasn't QE" because they were only buying short term government debt from banks in order to keep overnight cash cheap. But we all know the result is the same - print cash and give it to a bank in exchange for an asset. The Fed's balance sheet grew, and banks had the liquidity they needed again. This is the path they almost always take. When liquidity dries up, when the government needs cheap financing, or when a crisis threatens "moderate long term interest rates", the Federal Reserve steps in, printing enough new money to buy the necessary treasuries from the market. But given the fact that inflation is still so sticky, if the government were in need of a new round of QE again soon, it would be deeply unpopular for the Fed to abandon its fight against inflation, fire up the printer, and start QE again. Lucky for them, they may be able to accomplish stealth QE with a simple rule change for banks, and it wouldn't even have to show up on their own balance sheet. We'll come back to that in a moment. First we have to address the question of government borrowing. Is the government at risk of repeating the same thing that happened in September of 2019? Where they had borrowed all available cash out of the system, triggering a liquidity crisis? Yes. Right now, every time the government tries borrowing long term debt, the auctions don't go well. The difference between the rate they want to borrow at and what they end up paying is called a tail. Over the last few months, the sizes of tails on treasury auctions keep making new records. The one place the government is continuing to borrow from in order to avoid this mess is short term debt; T-Bills. The funding from this is coming from places like money market funds, who are pulling their cash out of the Fed's Reverse Repo Facility and buying T-Bills at auction instead. Right now there is only about $500 billion left in this facility. Within the next couple of months - at current government borrowing rates - this facility will be drained. Leaving the government forced to pay higher rates to attract lenders, until all the available money to lend has been fully borrowed. So what about this rule change? Current leverage rules limit how much a bank can buy and hold of any assets, including US treasuries. (Remember, when you buy a debt asset, that's just another way of saying you are loaning money). Banks buy a mix of assets to optimize return while paying attention to potential risk. The Federal Reserve could simply change this rule, so that the limits no longer apply to treasuries. They've done it before (temporarily) and they can do it again. This would allow banks to purchase a limitless amount of US treasuries, becoming a bottomless source of borrowing for the government. But what about profitability? Banks still would have to worry about that, right? Well, not really. Treasuries are considered "risk free" which means that you are guaranteed to get your money back if you hold it until maturity. Recently, that was a big "IF" for banks that were holding underwater treasuries while a bank run started. It didn't matter that the treasury was considered risk free if they had to sell it prior to maturity at a loss. But the Fed has facilities in place that give banks the ability to temporarily offload underwater treasuries to the Fed in exchange for cash if they need it. So without the need to worry about risk, and with a leverage rule change that exempts US treasuries, banks could become a source of borrowing for the government that has no end. Banks would loan money into existence to the US government, buying as many treasuries as they wanted, keeping all the upside and none of the risk. QE through the banks, without the Fed's balance sheet ever having to change. Without the Fed's credibility being challenged. And they can keep up their facade of fighting inflation, all the while enabling the very thing that will keep it roaring higher. The End.
43
108
34
502
76,172
And your bearish-Anon? isda.org/a/h3sgE/ISDA-Submit… When regulations no longer serve their intended purpose, they always change the rules, don't they? ISDA is asking to PERMANENTLY let banks exclude U.S. Treasury securities from their leverage ratio calculations. - Presently: these ratios act as a cap on banks' lending capacities and their Treasury holdings. - Removing Treasuries from this mix effectively gives banks unconditional authority to increase their Treasury portfolios at will. Furthermore, Treasuries could become the go-to collateral for debt issuance, setting the stage for the Fed to usher in a major new player in the Treasury market. This could mark a pivot from the Fed's recent trend of scaling back its Treasury purchases. The shift would reallocate credit exposure from the public to the private sector, turning the typical bailout approach on its head. @dharmatrade this could be a big development for your net liquidity.
3
6
3
23
6,487