Kratinos Socratous retweeted
Despite another comeback, this has to be the end for Michael Carrick at Manchester United: One win in 10 league games and 18th in the table, and in the relegation zone is a disgrace. No excuses.
Kratinos Socratous retweeted
Manchester United fans with a very blunt message to Sir Jim Ratcliffe and Co at Old Trafford today 😳
Kratinos Socratous retweeted
#GlazersAndIneosOut – at Cyprus
Η δημοσιογραφική ευθύνη δεν σταματά στη μετάδοση μιας είδησης. Ο παραπλανητικός τίτλος «Διευθυντής ξενοδοχείου κακοποίησε ανήλικες» στιγματίζει άδικα έναν ολόκληρο επαγγελματικό κλάδο.
Ο καταδικασθείς δεν είναι διευθυντής ξενοδοχείου ούτε μέλος του ΠΑΣΥΔΙΞΕ. Είναι μη προσοντούχος εργοδοτούμενος σε τουριστική επιχείρηση.
@tsouroullis
#Κύπρος #Cyprus
▶️ΠΑΣΥΔΙΞΕ: Καταδικάζει τη σεξουαλική κακοποίηση ανηλίκων σε ξενοδοχείο
#Cyprus
sigmalive.com/news/local/133…
Kratinos Socratous retweeted
To our guests, thank you for spending a little of your summer with us. And to our Capo Bay team, thank you for the early starts, the late evenings, and the care that makes every guest feel welcome. Here’s to another wonderful summer together. See you in 2027! 💙
Kratinos Socratous retweeted
Pick your spot. By the pool, under a tree, or a little closer to the sea?
🚨 Roy Keane on Manchester United keeping Michael Carrick:
“You’ve just been humiliated by Bournemouth at Old Trafford. You’re near the relegation places, haven’t won in eight league games, and the people running the club decide to carry on as normal.
Carry on with what? What exactly are we protecting?
I keep hearing that Michael Carrick cares deeply about United. Of course he does. He played here, won trophies. Nobody’s questioning that.
But since when did loving Manchester United qualify you to manage Manchester United?
There are 70,000 people at Old Trafford who love the club. Some have watched this rubbish for years. Maybe give one of them the job.
I’ve said from the beginning I didn’t believe Michael was the right man. That’s not personal. But this is Manchester United, not a job you hand somebody because he’s a nice fella.
And the people above him are an even bigger problem.
I’ll tell you what I imagine those meetings are like.
Somebody walks in after Bournemouth and asks, ‘Right, what are we doing about the manager?’
Another fella says, ‘Well, the supporters were still applauding him.’
So what?
They were applauding a former player who gave years to the club. They weren’t celebrating getting battered by Bournemouth.
But I wouldn’t put it past this lot to think, ‘The crowd still likes Michael. Maybe we can get another week out of him.’
That’s the level of leadership we’re dealing with.
And now they’re sending him to Stamford Bridge. Chelsea are better than Bournemouth. They’ll punish you if you turn up like that again.
What bothers me is that the people running United seem to have started negotiating how badly they can afford to lose.
I can almost hear it.
‘Michael, listen. We know Chelsea are a good team. We’re not expecting miracles. Just make sure it isn’t another humiliation.’
And somebody says, ‘If we lose 1-0, at least we can call it an improvement.’
An improvement?
You’re Manchester United!
When I was there, if somebody came into our dressing room suggesting a 1-0 defeat was respectable, he’d have been told to get out.
We lost matches. We got beaten by better teams. But you went into every match believing you could win. That was the minimum.
Now the people making decisions seem to be hoping the next defeat doesn’t make headlines for too long.
That’s not ambition. That’s damage limitation.
Look at the supporters travelling to Stamford Bridge, spending their money, taking time away from their families. They’ll still turn up believing United can win. They’ll sing and demand that the players fight for every ball.
How can the supporters have more belief in Manchester United than the people paid to run it?
And don’t tell me sacking another manager won’t solve everything. Of course it won’t. Recruitment has been poor, leadership has been poor, and too many players have got away with unacceptable performances.
But you don’t keep making the wrong decision because you’ve made wrong decisions before.
If Michael isn’t the right man, make a decision. If you believe he is, explain why. Show some leadership.
Instead they’re hiding behind a man who served the club brilliantly as a player, leaving him to face the cameras while everybody else disappears.
I don’t feel sorry for him. I only feel sorry for the supporters.
Because the frightening thing about United isn’t that they’re losing matches.
It’s that the people in charge are starting to behave as though losing is perfectly normal.”
Kratinos Socratous retweeted
‘Michael Carrick will be given time to turn things around’ and ‘the hierarchy do not want to rush next steps’ should be read and digested for what it really is: an indecisive club without any succession planning or contingencies because it doesn’t have clarity of identity in the first place. A club that often takes the cheap instead of the smart or right route because of the crippling Glazer debt, plus decision-makers who are never aligned - except in their own self-preservation. And it ends up costing more.
It explains the chaotic nature of lurching from one coaching philosophy to its extreme, to revisiting candidates that were on the agenda - some as far back as 2019 - that were already ruled out, to having a shortlist of options with nothing in common to take over a mishmash team that has suffered from horrid squad planning; both in incomings and exits.
Blame the players, blame the name in the dugout while the people who brought them to Manchester United, kept them, created the absolute opposite of a culture of excellence are allowed to rinse and repeat.
Kratinos Socratous retweeted
🚨 Roy Keane on Michael Carrick benching Bruno Fernandes in Manchester United’s humiliating defeat to Bournemouth:
“Honestly, what the hell was Carrick thinking? You're playing Bournemouth, your team is struggling, and you decide Bruno Fernandes is the man who should sit on the bench? **That's not a brave decision. That's a stupid decision.**
I don't care what happens in training or what conversations you've had behind closed doors. Bruno is one of the few players in that team who can create something out of absolutely nothing. He takes responsibility. He demands the ball. He gets angry when things aren't going well.
And you're leaving him out? For what? To prove a point? To show everyone you're the boss?
**Forget your ego! Your job is to win football matches, not to make statements with team selection.**
Look at the result. United lose 3-0, the supporters are furious, the manager is in tears, and we're sitting here discussing whether this club is heading towards a relegation battle.
You cannot make decisions like that at Manchester United and expect people to clap for you when they go wrong.
And let me tell you something else: Bruno Fernandes isn't perfect. He loses the ball, he complains, and sometimes he tries too much. But I'd rather have a player who wants to take responsibility than ten players hiding when the pressure comes.
**You don't bench one of your most influential players when your team desperately needs leadership unless you have a very good reason. And if Carrick had one, he'd better explain it.**
This is Manchester United, not a place for managers to experiment with their egos while the club falls apart.
Carrick got that decision wrong. Completely wrong. And after a performance like that, he has absolutely nowhere to hide.”































