Defending liberty and the Constitution since 1976. Learn more at https://teapaw.org/t.co/9l6F3Pd208. Retweets are not endorsements.
Kansas City, MO and Leesburg, VA
Joined April 2016
- Tweets3K
- Following198
- Followers813
- Likes623
Pinned Tweet
Landmark is defending the Constitution at the Supreme Court and fighting for free and SECURE elections.
Would you support our work with a gift today? Text "Constitution" to 50155 to join our team!
On October 22, the Supreme Court stayed an appeal that would have forced New Hampshire election precincts to consider student IDs as proof of photo identification. The case stems from a nonprofit's lawsuit challenging NH legislation that discouraged election officials from considering student IDs as proof of identity unless presented alongside acceptable photo identification. The Court's order is a victory for election integrity, ensuring that voter ID requirements remain clear and consistent leading up to Election Day!
Tomorrow, AMERICANS will exercise their civic responsibility at the ballot box.
While Election Day comes only once a year, the fight to ensure that YOUR voice is protected is a daily battle. The left continued to attack the integrity of our electoral system. As you go to cast your vote, consider taking a moment to read about the ongoing battle over your right to vote, and Landmark’s role in protecting American voters.
Read more!
landmarklegal.org/landmark-f…
Expanding the Supreme Court would make it more, not less, partisan.
redstate.com/redstate-guest-…
Landmark Legal retweeted
The Public Should Reject the Left’s Calls to Expand the Supreme Court redstate.com/redstate-guest-… @LandmarkLegal #SCOTUS
In failing to pass the Save America Act the Senate deprived states of accessing critical voter information. If 2/3 of states are now hiding who is on their voter rolls, what does that signal about the integrity of our system?
teapaw.org/AAGDhillon/status/2112…
We @CivilRights have requested the voter rolls of ALL 50 states. 1/3 of the states cooperated, and 2/3 didn’t (including CA). @TheJusticeDept will continue to enforce federal laws, such as VRA, HAVA, and NVRA, to ensure free and fair elections for ALL Americans!
Rampant voter fraud persists across U.S. communities. Our system needs increased voter verification law to protect American voices at the ballot box!
teapaw.org/FBIDirectorKash/status…
More arrests this morning tied to alleged voter fraud.
Protecting American elections from criminal interference remains a top priority of this @FBI.
We will use every legal resource to hold those who violate our election laws accountable and defend every American citizen’s constitutional right to vote.
Thank you @DHSgov and @TheJusticeDept
-DKP🇺🇸
Landmark has been talking about California's problems with non-citizen voter registration since 2018! DOJ's lawsuit and prosecutions are welcome but long overdue!
dailycaller.com/2018/10/17/c…
Landmark files regulatory comment with US Department of Housing and Urban Development to remove the disparate-impact standard from Title VI regulations!
landmarklegal.org/wp-content…
In Sep. 2021, the National School Boards Association urged President Biden to treat parents who publicly disagreed with their woke ideology (critical race theory, transgender indoctrinations, COVID-19 mandates, etc.) as "the equivalent of a form of domestic terrorism."
A.G. Garland weaponized the FBI against parents DESPITE many DOJ officials warning that the attacks were "ridiculous."
dailysignal.com/2026/10/05/b…
H-1B visa reform is back on the agenda as DHS proposes a rule to remove deference given to visa holders already in the states.
news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-…
What is a separation of church and state? Legal professor and Centennial Chair of Constitutional Law, @JoshMBlackman dives into the history surrounding the Establishment Clause and its application to states.
teapaw.org/JoshMBlackman/status/2…
New in @CivitasOutlook The Establishment Clause at the Second Founding. "The relevant time frame to understand the Establishment Clause for state cases is 1868, and not 1791." civitasoutlook.com/research/…
Eliminating OPT doesn't require an act of Congress. DHS can begin the process today. Reduce fraud and preserve American jobs!
washingtonexaminer.com/op-ed…
(1 of 6) With the October term underway, Landmark shares its top picks for major SCOTUS cases to watch!
(5 of 6) Grand v. City of University Heights presents the Court with a chance to consider whether the First Amendment’s chilling-effect doctrine applies when government threats allegedly deter religious exercise, worship, and assembly in the context of a land-use dispute.