Rachel AngloCelt

Normalising the demographic replacement of the British people in our homeland means more than changing our perception of the criminal society into which the UK has been transformed by replacement immigration or who is responsible for the crimes of which few of us will avoid being the victim: it also means changing our laws. In March 2025, the UK’s Sentencing Council put forward ‘community and custodial sentences guidelines’ that would require judges and magistrates to impose harsher custodial or community sentences on citizens of the UK who are British, White, male, heterosexual or Christian. The rationale was that, since foreigners, Blacks, transvestites and Muslims have a far higher arrest rate and are hugely overrepresented in UK prisons, our justice system must be xenophobic, racist, transphobic and Islamophobic. It must be corrected, therefore, by reducing sentences or letting off criminals with what are classified, under Section 4 of the Equality Act 2010, as ‘protected characteristics’. As the day these guidelines were to come into effect approached, however, they were blocked by the Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-Sentence Reports) Act 2025 on 1 April and sent back to the Sentencing Council for review. In June, therefore, the Sentencing Council reissued the guidelines with the references to the protected characteristics of offenders removed. Only averted by public awareness of and opposition to their justification and effects, these guidelines would, in effect, have turned the UK into an apartheid state, and will in the future when they will, undoubtedly, return in different form. Indeed, even without these formal changes to sentencing guidelines, the UK is already ruled by a two-tier system of justice administered by judges indoctrinated into the ideology of woke, its hatred of White people and the policy of replacement immigration it and they serve. As an example of which, just as the Home Office and London Mayor try to convince us that sexual harassment is a crime committed exclusively by White Britons rather than, as it disproportionately is, by Blacks, before these sentencing guidelines were blocked there was a campaign to change our perception of what they would mean for White Britons. In particular, it was widely repeated that they were mere guidelines it is within the discretion of a judge or magistrate to reject. As an example of which, Dr. Laura Janes, a solicitor defending the guidelines in The Law Society Gazette, wrote in March 2025: ‘They are just guidance and do not require judges to take a particular course of action.’ This is a demonstrable lie. Under Section 59 of the Sentencing Act 2020 it states very clearly and unequivocally that every court ‘must, in sentencing an offender, follow any sentencing guidelines which are relevant’. Indeed, the Sentencing Council itself states on its own website that UK courts ‘must follow any relevant sentencing guidelines, unless it is contrary to the interests of justice to do so.’ This, of course, raises the question of what justice is under the two-tier system the Sentencing Council seeks to impose upon us. This was partially answered by Pavan Dhaliwal, an Indian woman and Chief Executive of the justice reform charity, Revolving Doors, who commented: ‘We already have a two-tier justice system where Black, Asian, and minority (sic) ethnic people face harsher sentences and are less likely to receive community alternatives’. The UK, in other words, is a racist country, its racist people operating racist institutions. This is the kind of textbook woke dogma we’re used to hearing in the mouths of liberal activists; it’s far more concerning hearing it repeated by the CEO of a charity seeking to transform the UK’s justice system with DEI criteria that would disproportionately punish the native people of Britain. This is the essence of woke: that when reality (far higher crime rates among foreigners, Blacks, transsexuals and Muslims) doesn’t accord with its ideology, it seeks to change our perception of that reality, not only by depicting White Britons as criminals and rapists but also, in this case, by permitting those protected by the Equality Act 2020 to murder, rape and steal from the British people without censure or punishment. Not content with this attempt to determine the sentencing of criminals according to their nationality, race, mental disorder or religion, in March 2025 the National Police Chief’s Council published a new commitment to the ‘Police Race Action Plan: Improving Policing for Black People’, which it had first introduced in 2020. Under the DEI category of ‘equity’ — which is the opposite of the principle of equality before the law but seeks, instead, to engineer outcomes in conformity with woke ideology — this will require police officers to bring about parity in arrest rates between White Britons and the far higher criminal behaviour of Black and Muslim immigrants and children of immigrants living in Britain. What this police plan does is adopt the woke argument that Blacks are only arrested because UK police are racist and not because of their criminal behaviour, and write this into the best practices of the UK’s police forces. Not only does this not address the spiralling crime committed by immigrants in Britain but it will, in addition, allow more of these criminals to avoid arrest and sentences appropriate for their crimes. The correlation of this apartheid criminal law is that, while foreigners, Blacks and Muslims are free to steal from, rape and murder us with impunity from arrest and without deterrence of custodial sentences by our justice system, British citizens are arrested by our police and imprisoned for years by our courts for daring to speak about the overwhelmingly negative effects of replacement immigration I have documented in this chapter. As a recent example of which, a so-called asylum seeker from Ethiopia who, within a few days of arriving in Britain in the summer of 2025, sexually assaulted an English woman and a 14-year-old girl in Epping, North-East London, received a prison sentence of just 12 months from the judge; while three English men involved in the protests outside the hotel in Epping in which the man was housed by the UK taxpayer, received sentences of, respectively, 2 years and 4 months, 2 years and 2 months, and 1 year and 10 months. It is into the judgement of such woke ideologues in positions of authority in the UK’s justice system that any British person arrested in Britain will now fall; and the purpose of these widely publicised travesties of justice is to deter the native population of Britain from daring to protest against our replacement by immigrants and to punish those who do with wildly unjust sentences. Indeed, the UK, which has been a police state since March 2020, might now be said to have entered a period of state terror enacted against the British people. Under woke legislation and the terror now being inflicted by our police forces, law courts and security services, the British people not only have to pay to import, house, train, educate, clothe, feed and provide health cover and welfare benefits for up to a million immigrants per year for the foreseeable future, but we also have to allow them to steal from, rape and murder us without complaint, without protest and without fighting back. This, unmistakably, is the legislation of a colonial power intent on reducing the native population of Britain to servitude, poverty and second-class citizenship. Woke isn’t merely creating a code of behaviour, speech and ultimately thought to which we are being compelled to adhere on pain of arrest and imprisonment: it is, in addition, a so far wildly successful attempt to change what we understand to be reality when it doesn’t accord with the principles of its ideology. Extract from my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. If you’re wondering why Muslim rape gangs are free to operate in at least a third of the local authorities in Britain and the handful of Muslims who have been arrested have been let out of prison in a few years, while Britons feel ‘the full force of the law’ under apartheid policing and sentences by kangaroo courts, you may be interested in my book. The link is below. architectsforsocialhousing.c…

What happened to Christmas? Or, do you still think Britain is a Christian state? On the initiative of the Ramadan Tent Project, a Muslim NGO sponsored by the Aziz Foundation, which is itself funded by a Malawi Muslim billionaire, ‘Happy Ramadan’, the Islamic festival that now dominates every February and March in Britain just as Islamophobia Awareness Month dominates November, has been spelled out in lights on London’s Regent Street since 2023. However, ever since a Pakistan Muslim, Sadiq Khan, became the Mayor of London in 2016, the word ‘Christmas’ — which has been celebrated in Britain since 597 AD when St. Augustine baptised over 10,000 Anglo-Saxon converts in Canterbury and in Regent Street’s lights since 1954 — has been replaced by the unchanged and generic imagery of angels with no reference to the Christian festival. Belief in angels is one of the core tenets of Islam and one of the six articles of faith. Indeed, angels are more prominent in Islam than in Judaism or Christianity. The triumphant angels, their arms raised aloft, that have lined Regent Street every November and December for eleven years under the Mayorship of Sadiq Khan are a celebration not of Christmas but of the Islamic Conquest of Britain. Conquering religions always build on the sacred sites of the conquered people, and the lights on Regent Street at Ramadan, as at what is now euphemistically referred to as Britain’s ‘Winter Festival’, are the equivalent of the Rashidun Caliphate building the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, the holiest site in Judaism. Another event organised by the Ramadan Tent Project took place on 2 March last year, when King Charles II opened the doors of St. George’s Hall, named after the Patron Saint of England, in Windsor Castle to 360 Muslims breaking their Ramadan fast. This was the first time Iftar had been held in the State Apartments, which are usually reserved for banquets for visiting Heads of State. And, for the thirteenth year running, on 29 March, 2026, London’s Muslim Mayor, Sadiq Khan, hosted the Open Iftar finale in Trafalgar Square, another event organised by the Ramadan Tent Project. But the celebrations of the Islamic Conquest of Britain don’t stop there. On 5 March 2026, Keir Starmer, then Prime Minister of the UK, invited representatives from the myriad Muslim organisations operating in Britain into 10 Downing Street. There he told not only the Muslims present but Muslims across the UK: ‘You are the face of modern Britain.’ In attendance were the following Muslims: • Shabana Mahmood, a Pakistan Muslim who, since September 2025, has been the UK’s Home Secretary, in which capacity she oversees law enforcement in England and Wales, national security and counter terrorism, immigration and border security, as well as MI5, the UK’s domestic counter-intelligence and security agency. This is despite the fact that, as of March 2024, 63% of prisoners in the UK arrested on terrorist-related charges are Islamic terrorists; and that MI5 currently lists Islamic terrorism as the most significant threat to Britain by volume . • Adam Kelwick, a Yemeni Muslim and imam of the Abdullah Quilliam Mosque in Liverpool who led the Islamic prayers. After the 7/7 attacks in Britain by Islamic terrorists that killed 54 people and injured 784, Kelwick complained about security checks faced by Muslims at UK airports. In October 2023, his mosque hosted Haroon Hanif, another imam, who in his sermon — which was broadcast live on the mosque’s social media pages — argued that its worshippers should ‘wage war for Allah’, urged them not to be ‘weak about jihad’, and to follow Allah’s wishes to ‘wipe out disbelievers’. The sermon was reported by the National Secular Society and the mosque was subsequently issued with a warning by the Charity Commission. • Saeed Atcha, MBE, an Indian Muslim and CEO of the charity, Youth Leads UK, from whose exchange programme with the US Embassy he resigned in 2016 following the election of Donald Trump. Despite being only 30 years old, Atche is a former trustee of the Prince of Wales’ charity, Step Up To Serve; is the Associate Non-Executive Director of Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust; the trustee of Generation UK & Ireland; a patron of the East of England’s Children’s charity, Ormiston Families; the Commissioner for Young People and Vulnerable Groups at the Social Mobility Commission, and Deputy Lieutenant of Greater Manchester, one of the centres of the Muslim grooming- and rape-gang network. • Lord Wajid Khan, a Pakistani Muslim, who was nominated for his peerage by Keir Starmer, is the former Member of the European Parliament for North-West England, and today sits on the Labour Party National Policy Forum, the International Policy Commission and the North West regional board. In July 2024, he was appointed Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Faith, Communities and Resettlement with a remit and government funding to ‘combat hate against Muslims’. He used his position in the House of Lords to lobby for Starmer’s Government to adopt the All-Party Parliamentary Group of British (sic) Muslims’ definition of Islamophobia by which Britons critical of Islam are arrested and sentenced in Britain today. • Muhammad Butt, a Pakistani Muslim and Leader of London’s Brent Council, in which 21.4% of the population were Muslim in the 2021 Census and far more are today, and only 15% of the population was White British in 2024. • Muhbeen Hussain, MBE, a Pakistan Muslim and founder of British Muslim Youth, and a Labour Party researcher who was instrumental in the drawing up of the APPG definition of Islamophobia. In October 2015, Hussain — whose uncle, Mahroof Hussain, was a Labour cabinet member and councillor in Rotherham when the Muslim rape gangs were operating — organised Muslims in Rotherham, his home town, to refuse to cooperate with West Yorkshire Police in their investigation into the Muslim rape gangs, and called on those who do cooperate to be boycotted by the Muslim diaspora. In response, in July 2025 Hussain was awarded an MBE in the King’s Birthday Honours for ‘Political Services to Integration, Cohesion and to British Society’ The Iftar reception in 10 Downing Street wasn’t an isolated event. On 4 March, 2025, Starmer had hosted the Big Iftar in Westminster Hall, the first time it has been held in this, the oldest part of the Houses of Parliament, which was built in the late Eleventh Century, and is traditionally used for state banquets and lying-in-state ceremonies such as that held for Queen Elizabeth II. Organised by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims, this was the first time a Prime Minister had done so, with an imam addressing the congregation from the House of Commons in Arabic and English. Insufficiently purged of his Christian or Jewish faith, on 3 April Starmer hosted yet another Muslim festival, Eid al Fitr, at 10 Downing Street, when he openly declared that the seat of the UK Government belongs to Muslims. Besides, once again, the London Mayor, among those in attendance was Anisa Mahmood, a Pakistani Muslim and the Founder and Director of the Anti-Islamophobia Working Group (AIWG), which in February 2024 published its report, Strategies for Eradicating Islamophobia in the UK. Needless to say, no equivalent events were held for Lent or Ash Wednesday, the equivalent festival to Iftar in the Christian calendar: not by the King, who despite being the Head of the Church of England and nominal Defender of the Anglican Faith appears to have converted to Islam; not by the Prime Minister of the UK, in which 46.2% of the population was still Christian in the 2021 Census; and not, of course, by the Muslim Mayor of London. Extract from my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. If you still think that Christmas is being celebrated on Regent Street, that Britain is still a Christian state, that our hereditary Head of State and newly-retitled ‘protector of the space for Faith within the multi-faith nation’ is a Christian, or that the UK Government is representing and protecting the interests and beliefs of Christians and atheists rather than those of Muslims, you need to read it. The link is below. architectsforsocialhousing.c…