
Assoc. Prof. @roskildeuni. Transitional justice, int'l courts in Africa, politics of int'l justice & judicialisation of peace. Tweets are private.
Joined September 2021
- Tweets658
- Following518
- Followers397
- Likes2.3K
Pinned Tweet
Global Governance by Manual. I analyse this ubiquitous yet undertheorised technology of global governance, demonstrating its contribution to informal standardisation in the field of #transitional #justice through world making, ordering. doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag004
How is the transitional justice (TJ) localization not the opposite of standardization but its very condition of possibility? How are calls to contextualize TJ in fact aiding standardization rather than protecting against it? Localization in World Politics shows.acast.com/localization…
Where is the anti-impunity brigade nowadays? European and Latin American leaders and US human rights organisations claimed to "fight impunity". They negotiated treaties, built courts, established intl judiciaries, bureaucracies, and architectures for "anti-impunity"
Israeli Defense Minister Katz on Lebanon:
'60 villages destroyed. 23,000 houses demolished. 200,000 residents gone. This is the Gaza model, and this is the model we are implementing.'
Just a Minister of Defense proudly listing the villages he erased and the 200,000 people he displaced
They've stopped hiding it
Line Engbo Gissel retweeted
⭕️ Israeli reservist tells Der Spiegel his unit killed Palestinians who approached hidden positions, then logged them as terrorists
The soldier, who spent about 250 days in Gaza, described a procedure his unit often used called “Alman Kasch,” in which troops take up concealed positions in areas that have not been evacuated and open fire on anyone who comes near.
“If Palestinians, who do not know that our soldiers are there, approach, they are shelled. Usually other people come along who want to help, they are also shot at. Within a few minutes, five, six or seven people are killed. The protocol says: seven terrorists eliminated. But no, it’s just seven people who crossed an intersection. Important: We do not kill, we eliminate. That’s how we’ve always phrased it.”
He said his brigade killed 160 to 170 people during more than 80 days in the Netzarim corridor, where “there were no fighting, no attacks by Hamas.”
“Only one man was suspected to carry a gun. No one saw the gun, it was night, and he had something with him that could have been interpreted as a weapon. He was killed about 500 meters north of the corridor, so he was not a direct danger, and we never examined his body. But not only him, but all these dead were reported as terrorists.”
The soldier is one of ten who gave testimony to Der Spiegel.
Line Engbo Gissel retweeted
new special issue - What was the Cold War?
cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Line Engbo Gissel retweeted
By throwing vereran diplomat Olara Otunnu so late into the race for UN Sec-Gen, Uganda President surely isn’t expecting he will win. And him losing might be the objective. Otunnu’s profile has shot up dramatically from recent obscurity. Now M7 can say, “even in defeat, Otunnu has shown he has the potential to be a global leader. Let us give him late Moses Ali’s Deputy Prime Minister job”, which might be the real goal of this play. Some speculate they could use him to steal back the leadership of UPC from Jimmy Akena Obote, who has turned rebellious. It would be a fool’s errand, I think, but whatever the case, Otunnu will be perched on some high Ugandan political table after this saga.
Returning to questions of @IntlCrimCourt establishment in the 1990s and 2000s. This time to probe deeper into issues of Court independence. How was independence conceptualised and which design mechanisms to enhance or undermine independence did states propose?
Line Engbo Gissel retweeted
This is genuinely shocking, and says so much about our approach to China.
I decided to check for independent reviews of the English version Xi Jinping's latest book, published a year ago, to see what people had to say about it since I hadn't read it myself.
To my surprise, I couldn't find any: not a single thoughtful review about the book out there! Even on Amazon, check it for yourself (amazon.com/XI-JINPING-GOVERN…): the book has only 3 ratings, that's it.
No matter where you stand on China, you’ve got to admit that’s pretty crazy: the sitting president of the world's rising superpower publishes a 700-page book explaining exactly what he's doing and why, and we don’t even care to look.
If there ever was a fact that illustrates just how willfully ignorant we are about China, this is it.
All the more because we then go spew the usual clichés around how secretive and impenetrable the Chinese system is: the book is on Amazon for $21 for crying out loud!
Anyhow, this felt so wrong that I figured I'd fix it. I bought the book, read it attentively and wrote what I hope you'll agree is a thoughtful review of it.
The book contains genuinely surprising passages, such as Xi writing that oversight of the Communist Party by "the judiciary, the public, and the media" was not just something the Party must “readily accept,” but something that he framed as historically decisive - an essential component to "escaping the historical cycle of rise and fall" that has doomed every dynasty in China's history.
Other passage that I'm sure would surprise many: a common narrative out there is that China blames the West for the century of humiliation and is driven by revenge. Well, Xi explains that's not true at all: the century of humiliation was China's own mistake, originated in the Ming Dynasty's disastrous "policy of national seclusion" that "resulted in China missing out on the opportunities presented by the Industrial Revolution" and "led to China’s decline."
All in all, the book is remarkably self-reflective and thoughtful. For instance Xi recognizes that his drive for “full and rigorous internal governance” - including to rid the Party of corruption - risked "instill[ing] fear and apprehension, or intimidate members into inaction.” He emphasizes the need for pragmatism in this regard, codified in a framework called the “Three Distinctions” that separates honest mistakes - made while experimenting, reforming, or operating without precedent - from deliberate violations committed for personal gain.
And many other surprises still. I found it a genuinely fascinating read for anyone interested in how the Chinese system works and how Xi thinks - or anyone interested in governance, period, as so much of what he writes is pretty universally applicable.
This is the link to my review of the book, an article I titled "The Book the West Refuses to Read": open.substack.com/pub/arnaud…
Line Engbo Gissel retweeted
350+ former EU ministers, ambassadors and senior officials call for suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement over Israel's systematic violations of international law in Gaza, West Bank incl. East Jerusalem, and Lebanon
Line Engbo Gissel retweeted
this discourse of innocence as an appeal to deservingness of rights must stop
The challenge of global governance is not local ownership but authorship, suspended in tension between global goals and national self-definition. 'Global Governance by Manual: The Transitional Justice Toolkit and the Standardization of a Field' academic.oup.com/isq/article…
Line Engbo Gissel retweeted
The percentage of child dead in the Ukrainian conflict is 0.3%.
Zero point three per cent.
The percentage of child dead in the Gaza conflict is 37.7%.
Thirty seven point seven per cent.
In a single statistic, there you have the difference between a war and a genocide.
Line Engbo Gissel retweeted
Multilateralism has never been an inspiring word. It is procedural, abstract, and emotionally thin. No one rallies under its banner, and no leader wins popularity by defending it. Yet for Africa, multilateralism has never been a luxury of orderly times or a matter of institutional aesthetics. It has been, repeatedly and painfully, a strategy of survival.
amaniafrica-et.org/africasmu…
This is big news for ICC researchers. So much for building an independent court.
UK admits a threatening phone call between Cameron & ICC’s Karim Khan took place to scare him into halting the israeli war crimes probe middleeasteye.net/news/exclu…
The @NobelPrize Committee confused peace and democracy. They are often linked, but they are not identical. You can war to pursue democratisation, but not to pursue peace. You can have authoritarian peace, but not authoritarian democracy.
Very happy to attend the Basel Peace Forum. Questions of world order loom large here too and speakers pursue issues of mediation in the wider (un)rule of law context.
Peace processes never look pretty, always look messy. And when you wish for one side's victory, the compromise always feels like an affront, a violation. They only make sense if you focus on their purpose, ending war. That goal may even not feel higher, to those who are safe...






















