Extraordinary machine ✨
Joined October 2024
- Tweets4.8K
- Following504
- Followers814
- Likes20K
"No new wars" was a campaign promise. And the majority of the Country fell for it. DJT 'ate' at a Mcdonalds! He must have understood and cared for the needs of the US citizens right?
Turns out, all the world really is a stage. DJT is just another (greedy self serving) actor.
Jurors decide guilt - not treatment. If this becomes the standard, the justice system is doomed.
🚨 BREAKING:
In a second interview, one of the original three jurors from the Clancy mistrial speaks more in-depth about the deliberations and basically admits her verdict was based on what she ‘believed’ would be ‘justice’ for the murdered children and the best outcome for their killer, Lindsay Clancy.
But that wasn’t what the jury was supposed to consider.
The question for the jury was essentially;
“Did Lindsay Clancy have the mental capacity required for criminal responsibility when she killed her children?”
NOT
“What do you think is best for Lindsay?”
—I’m disgusted. 😑
This juror is complaining that another juror (the holdout) actually did what he was supposed do?!
As more jurors talk to the press.
Its obvious, Massachusetts jurors do not understand their assignment.
The Lindsay Clancy trial has made the difference in how men and women with serious mental illness are treated, impossible to ignore.
Bridgewater State Hospital, Massachusetts’ hospital for men, has a documented history of abuse, isolation, violent restraints, sexual assault, forced medication and chemical restraints by injection. Where is the public concern, the outrage, the vigils, the standouts for those seriously mentally ill men?
Meanwhile, people stand outside Tewksbury State Hospital supporting a woman who murdered her three children.
The misguided support and selective outrage is disgusting. I’m embarrassed to be from Massachusetts.
Lisa Marie retweeted
People blame Lindsay Clancy’s blank courtroom stare on antipsychotic medications, but she had those same dead eyes over a decade earlier. These physiological red flags are usually accurate, yet society has bullied us into ignoring our own intuition. teapaw.org/mamboitaliano__/status…
I think Lindsay Clancy had severe OCD. Control issues were a big part of her long before the murders. She needed every part of her life planned and controlled. Motherhood can't always be that way. Maybe she was truly suicidal and she felt nobody else could raise her kids.
Or else shes a heartless baby killer and was just evil and cruelly selfish. ... wanted to hurt Patrick.
It's so tragic that the state of Massachusetts is honoring their memory by holding somebody accountable. Neither parent want to take any responsibility. It's shocking. 💔
🙏🏻RIP Cora, Dawson and Callen.
This quoted post is unavailable.
It's truly a sick time in history when a mother who murders her children is applauded and cheered arriving to court.
Prior to murdering her children, Lindsay Clancy told her mother that she “just wanted to enjoy her kids again.”
Motherhood is difficult, some days are better than others. If every mother murdered their children when they weren't "enjoying them"... we would all be dead. Depressed or not.
RIP Cora, Dawson and Callan. They deserved protection, and neither their mother nor their father protected them.
More tragic, is that in death, it is Massachusetts ADA Jennifer Sprague standing in court seeking justice, accountability and retribution for these three children - not their parents.
Lindsay Clancy had 5 prescribing doctors, at least 1 therapist and dozens of other providers in less than 4 months.
She wasn't med seeking. She was seeking a diagnoses. When she wasn't diagnosed with PPD or PPP, she adjusted her symptoms and moved on to the next provider.
If this was approved by @adamdeitch team, I'm disgusted. He's suggesting causing more unrest in Norfolk County, wasting more tax paid money and harassing community members? People who have been through enough already!
This is exploiting JOK and using him as PR. It's gross!
Lisa Marie retweeted
It is a perfectly reasonable standard for a society to set that if you murder a child, your life is over. If you wanna let an insanity plea spare them from the death penalty? Fine. But they must die in prison. It’s not about punishment. It’s just protection. If you could snap and kill a kid, you simply can’t be trusted around people anymore. No matter what triggered it. This is in no way controversial.
It’s not like these baby killers are out curing cancer or something. They can rot in jail and ask God for mercy. We have become way too tolerant of criminality and way too compassionate towards the dregs of society. We have to stop wasting our compassion on baby killers and drug zombies. We have fire victims in Altadena and the Palisades and Spokane and Paradise (still) who are completely screwed and we are using up all our energy and empathy on the worst people in society. Snap out of it, folks.
Lisa Marie retweeted
"What's my defense again? I didn't know what I was doing or I did know what I was doing but couldn't help it or I didn't act upon not doing what I knew I was going to do or was it that since I tried to kill myself unsuccessfully that negates the fact that I successfully did kill my children as I knew and warned I would?"
Atty Reddington wants the jury to believe Lindsay Clancy has a 'flat affect' (inability to show emotion)
“I just wish that I could feel something” - Lindsay Clancy
"she’s unable and has been unable to express any happiness or sadness or cry" - Atty Reddington
I don't see it.
Lindsay Clancy was never diagnosed with PPD or PPP.
Let that sink in. How is a defendant using a diagnosis as her defense that she was NEVER diagnosed with?
Furthermore it was opined by the doctors, she did not have postpartum depression and did not qualify for the PPD program.
In Massachusetts, an NGRI verdict requires that, at the time of the offense, the defendant:
- Had a mental disease or defect, AND
- Because of it, lacked substantial capacity to either:
1. Appreciate the criminality or wrongfulness of the conduct, OR
2. Conform the conduct to the requirements of the law.
The jury has five possible verdicts for each child:
- Guilty of First-Degree Murder
- Guilty of Second-Degree Murder
- Guilty of Manslaughter
- Not Guilty by Reason of Lack of Criminal Responsibility (NGRI)
- Not Guilty
Why is 'Not Guilty' even a choice??
This trial proved that Lindsay Clancy was able to function appropriately in society, make choices, create and act upon a meticulous plan and manipulate her husband to accomplish her goals.
Lindsay Clancy only told her husband and her mother that she had thoughts of hurting her children. Not her doctors. She lied and manipulated her doctors.
Most importantly - not only was Lindsay Clancy never diagnosed with postpartum psychosis she was never even diagnosed with postpartum depression.
Even more damning it was determined that she didn't qualify for the PPD program because she did not have postpartum depression.
It will be a great Injustice if Lindsay Clancy isn't held responsible for murdering her children.
Did Lindsay Clancy have the capacity to understand whether her actions were right or wrong?
Dr. Gregory Saathoff: Yes ✔️
Could Lindsay Clancy conform her behavior to the requirements of the law?
Dr. Saathoff: Yes ✔️
Was Lindsay Clancy criminally responsible at the time of the murders?
Dr. Saathoff: Yes ✔️
Dr. Saathoff’s opinion: Lindsay Clancy understood right from wrong, could control and conceal her actions, and deliberately carried out an organized plan she knew was illegal and wrong.
She is guilty. Lock her up.
Reasons included...
- She interacted appropriately with her psychiatrist the day before, denying any suicidal or homicidal ideation.
- She was looking into Ketamine treatment.
- She took her child to the doctor that day, and the doctor noticed nothing concerning about her.
- She was functioning normally with the children.
- She researched the timing and distance of Patrick’s errands.
- She planned for Patrick to leave the house.
- Her actions were organized and methodical.
- She returned a call to Patrick to avoid suspicion, then continued to to murder their children.
-She chose the location and method herself.
- She took steps to avoid witness or interruption. Even locking Patrick's office door to slow down Patrick or the paramedics.
- When Patrick arrived she said she tried to kill herself.
- She reported no delusions or voices at the time of the murders.
Writer Brittany Romano made a mockery of herself and disrespected Plymouth Superior Court (and a trial for three dead children). Growing up with murder defendant Lindsay Clancy and then winking, smiling and blowing kisses at the camera during her trial is beyond unprofessional. Its grossly unethical and immoral.
When confronted about her behavior she started telling people to “jump off a cliff” and “jump off a bridge". She should never be published again.
@Forbes @Glamour @voguemagazine @TeenVogue @harpersbazaarus @CNTraveler
#Greendressgirl
#BoycottBrittanyRomano
