D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy) header
D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy) profile picture

Litigation counsel in Toronto. Advisory, Governance. Contributor Canadian Lawyer, Lawyers Daily/Law360, Law Times.

Toronto
Joined March 2011
Photo by D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy)Photo by D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy)Photo by D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy)Photo by D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy)Photo by D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy)Photo by D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy)Photo by D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy)Photo by D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy)Photo by D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy)Photo by D. Jared Brown (@LitigationGuy)
D. Jared Brown retweeted
For non-lawyers: This is a HUGE story! Weil is legal royalty. Founded in 1931. $2.1 billion in revenue last year. One of the most powerful law firms on Wall Street. Lehman Brothers. General Motors. Enron. Weil handled their bankruptcies. These are the lawyers you call when your company’s collapse is going to end up in a history book. Now they reportedly need restructuring counsel themselves. A wind-down would be a stunning end to a 95-year-old institution. How does this happen?
NEW: Brian Resnick from Davis Polk restructuring team now on scene at Weil and wind-down now being actively discussed among options: ft.com/content/69ccfcb0-3f5e…
107
107
30
1,173
436,327
At one point this was the objective of civil rights laws. Now its considered controversial.
Danielle Smith says Bill 33 would ban Alberta public institutions from hiring based on "race, religious beliefs, gender or gender identity" and end "mandatory diversity, equity and inclusion training in provincial bodies."
2
1
13
628
Every election in Toronto I seem to wake up the day after wondering who my neighbours are.
2
12
718
The lawn sign tally never seems to be indicative.
57
Bat signal is up.
Canada's anti-immigrant sentiment softening, according to new poll nationalpost.com/news/canada…
1
148
Super cool receiving this Hole in One Certificate from @SrixonGolf today!
1
14
406
Now that Carney has his majority, it is clear that the bat signal went out amongst progressives to restart the destructive mass migration policies.
The Federal Liberals Want To Restart Full Blown Immigration SOON Which is the WORST possible outcome for Canada It's so ridiculously obvious that the only people who benefit from mass Immigration are Big Business & the Rich The Psyop begins, news items & "experts" commenting
3
16
328
Canada's Traban.
This is who and what the recklessly inept Liberal bureaucracy is competing against - abusing Canadian tax dollars and moving Canada backwards economically and technologically. - already lost burning through $50 billion we could have spent on hospitals and schools but they wanted to bet against Tesla on EVs. Total failure. - now giving Telesat billions of taxpayer dollars to ‘compete’ with StarLink and SpaceX. Telesat is a US hedge fund company so badly managed for so long it has a negative price to earnings ratio. But it has a Liberal donor CEO Who hasn’t met a single timeline or target - ever - while Musk is making a car fly. We need to end this horrible - and deeply politicized - capital allocation and start partnering with the best firms in the world instead of creating fake govt funded imitations that burn taxpayers.
1
97
D. Jared Brown retweeted
Elon proofing? First the Liberals punched a $50 billion hole in Canadas budget competing on EVs against Tesla and losing all of it. Now they’ve given Telesat - owned by American hedge funds - more govt money than its entire market cap - to provide a subscale weak copycat of StarLink without the capabilities, scale or economics. And they’ll pay SpaceX for it to work. The federal govt is horrible at capital allocation. Using debt to fund failed business models the private markets won’t touch is stupidly wasteful. Doing it betting against far superior scale companies run by @elonmusk is totally insane.
If Elon-proofing Canada is actually a national strategy, Carney wins 300 seats when an election is called
51
238
23
1,676
63,356
Anyone looking around at the permanent Hamas marches and take overs of the public spaces and sees white nationalism has lost their marbles.
The rise in white nationalist activity and other hate-motivated behaviour is alarming. We need to take action to make sure Ottawa remains a safe and welcoming city for everyone. At the beginning of the next term of council, I will bring faith and community leaders together to find specific ways to stand up against hate, stop the recruiting of youth in schools, and ensure everyone is safe and feels safe in Ottawa. I’ll work with the Ottawa Police Service to double the resources in their Hate Crime Unit. There is no place for hatred and racism in our city, and there never will be. marksutcliffe.ca/media/2026/…
1
2
13
273
That's a wrap on golf season. Started with an Ace, then left, right, in the woods, shoulder surgery and back.
2
14
248
The @CDNConstFound really seems to get it done on these court challenges. They get outcomes.
Ottawa's attempt to sidestep the Constitution has been defeated once again. For the second time, the courts have rejected the federal government's attempt to claim powers that belong to the provinces. This is a major victory for Canadian federalism and a powerful affirmation of the constitutional limits on government power.
2
8
250
While Canada props up its own insolvent "traban" satellite internet company. We really are like soviet Russia.
We announced an agreement to acquire a nationwide low-band spectrum license portfolio that will pave the way for @Starlink to become a major mobile carrier in the US. With this new spectrum and our Gen2 constellation, Starlink Mobile can ensure Americans have access to high-speed mobile broadband no matter where they are → spacex.com/updates#starlink-…
13
335
The opportunity cost on this wasted money is mind boggling
COLUMN: Canada’s bottomless climate change money pit Canadians were paying at least $503 billion on more than 500 federal, provincial and territorial programs, which doesn't include municipal ones. torontosun.com/opinion/colum…
1
3
20
425
The Managers of the Grift as discussed by @PardyBruce
James Burnham – The Trotskyist Who Saw How It Would End. He was a Trotskyist first. In the 1930s he was one of the leading Marxist intellectuals in America – building the movement, debating Trotsky himself by letter, believing in the revolution. But he was also an American. A practical mind, trained to look at what actually happens rather than what the theory promises. So he understood what it was really about – and explained to us how it would work out. 1. In 1940 he broke with Trotsky over one question: what was the Soviet Union? Trotsky said a workers’ state, temporarily deformed. Burnham looked at it and saw something else: a new ruling class. The workers owned nothing. The capitalists were gone. Someone else was in charge – the people who ran the machine. Trotsky spent much of his last year writing against him. Burnham was right. 2. In 1941 he generalized it in The Managerial Revolution. The future would belong neither to the capitalists nor to the workers, but to the managers – the administrators, technicians and bureaucrats who control things without owning them. Capitalism would fall, he wrote – but not to the working class. To the managers. The capitalist, who risks his own fortune, would be replaced by the manager, who risks nothing, owns nothing and runs everything. That is the whole difference. The capitalist pays for his own mistakes. The manager’s mistakes are always paid by someone else – the shareholder, the taxpayer, the citizen. Burnham saw the same class rising in Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany and New Deal America. Different flags, the same new masters. And he said what it meant: the end of capitalism and of freedom – even if the façade stayed standing. 3. Orwell read it, argued with it – and borrowed from it. The three superstates of 1984 come from Burnham. So does its ruling class, which owns everything collectively and nothing personally. 4. In 1943 came The Machiavellians. Burnham studied the realists – Machiavelli and his modern heirs, like Pareto – and drew the lesson idealists never want to hear: every society is run by an elite. The only question is whether there is more than one. Freedom does not come from the absence of elites. It comes from their competition – rival powers that check each other, a free press, an opposition that can actually win. A single elite with no rival is tyranny, whatever it calls itself. 5. Now look at what the long march actually produced. Not the rule of the workers. The rule of the managers – the administrators of the ministries, the regulators in Brussels, the HR departments, the editorial boards. The façade of capitalism still stands – but who actually rules? Corporate boards spending other people’s money on other people’s ideologies. Officials in Brussels. Directors of foundations and NGOs. No voter elected them. The revolution succeeded. Only the managers won it. Gramsci designed the march. Burnham told us who would be waiting at the end of it. A class that owns nothing, answers to no voter, pays for none of its mistakes, and runs almost everything. 6. In 1964 he wrote Suicide of the West. Its verdict: liberalism – the modern progressive kind, not the classical one – is "the ideology of Western suicide." It lets a civilization accept its own retreat and feel good about it. Every loss becomes a sign of progress. Sixty years later, it reads like a description of Brussels. 7. The ex-Trotskyist ended up a founding editor of National Review, and in 1983 Ronald Reagan gave him the Presidential Medal of Freedom. From Trotsky’s comrade to Reagan’s medal. He knew the left from the inside, and he had the American instinct to ask the only question that matters: not what the theory promises, but who ends up in charge. In 1941 his answer was the managers. It still is – unless a rival elite rises. For the first time in decades, one has: builders, not administrators. Burnham would have recognized the moment. Not a revolution – a rotation.
3
12
354
D. Jared Brown retweeted
The Advocates' Society's position rests on a petitio principii --they assume a premise that is not granted: namely that judges make decisions on the facts & the law. The question of whether she did in this case is properly in dispute, due to Ms. Sarkonak's excellent journalism.
It has come to my attention that I have been denounced by @Advocates_Soc for criticizing judicial decisions — and yes, individual judges. Here's the thing. When someone, for example, spends her lawyerly career writing op-eds in favour of migration and calling herself an activist, and then becomes a federal judge, and from that seat allows all sorts of undesirables to remain in Canada on weak grounds, people are free to draw a connection from A to B. When a judge, for example, spends his lawyer years advocating fiercely for more race-based law, and then later throws out gun charges of black men on his (unsupported) assertion that police were racist during their arrests, people are free to question whether he's really a fair adjudicator. When a judge, for example, says that a ban on drug trafficking is unconstitutional, and then *applauds* vigilante drug dealers for their self-proclaimed safe supply program — applauds them for supporting the business of organized crime and feeding the addictions of street people — that's beyond the pale. You're worried about democracy being poisoned? Worry about the judge who threw out Parliament's law against selling heroin because she felt it was "common sense" that it was supported by science. I agree that it's not right to criticize a judge personally for impartially applying the law and coming to an unpopular decision (which they may even privately disagree with). But when their professional history, or their conduct in court, suggests allegiance to a cause that they happen to be ruling softly on, it will get noticed. Bringing the administration of justice into disrepute is a two-way street, you know.
4
29
1
198
3,980
This would be a despressing and joyless way to go through life demanding strict ideological compliance with your political priors from your sporting heroes.
As a sports card collector, I owned some very high-end Ovechkin cards. I sold every single one of them because of his support for Putin. I did the exact same thing with my Gretzky cards after his support for Trump. For me, collecting isn’t just about value or greatness on the ice. If I lose respect for the person, I lose interest in owning their cards.
4
2
34
1,246
This doesn't come across as the product of a government confident in its policies and governance, but rather damage control.
Industry Minister Melanie Joly has written to the President of Stelco, warning them that the up to 500 layoffs in Hamilton constitutes a breach of their 2024 agreement with the federal government to maintain unionized employment until 2029. She is giving the company five days to present a plan or potentially face “an application to the superior court for orders that may include directing compliance, divestiture, or monetary penalties” #cdnpoli
1
6
215
What our Leaders say in private is what some of us have been saying for years. Mass migration policies are destructive.
4
25
483