
PhD candidate | Disability research | Meta-psychology | Open science | @metahag.bsky.social
Sweden
Joined April 2012
- Tweets294
- Following606
- Followers252
- Likes15.3K
Pinned Tweet
I’ve decided to start a blog! Primarily to practice writing and coding, but the content might be useful to others, so I’m sharing here. I’m open to feedback/suggestions if anyone’s interested! (I’ll just report any negative comments 🥰) elucidatescience.netlify.app…
Lucija Batinovic retweeted
A short primer on #reproducibility by our team is now out at @Curr_Protocols, intended for researchers who want to get into some good repro practices. Covers transparent reporting of methods, data sharing, and much more! Read at: doi.org/10.1002/cpz1.70299
Lucija Batinovic retweeted
I've created a shiny app to browse through all (now 3400) open science blog posts. There is a 'happening today' button. Among others, Rolf Zwaan in 2020 on sequential analyses rolfzwaan.blogspot.com/2020/…
For anyone who’s published systematic reviews, how often did you succeed in getting unpublished data by reaching out to authors? I don’t mean additional/IP data from published papers, but new data or data they could not get published.
Lucija Batinovic retweeted
I am stepping in as chair of IGDORE Sweden. Looking forward to taking IGDORE Sweden into the future together with affiliates and staff! My deepest thanks to outgoing chair Rebecca Willén for all she has done in founding the organization and building it to where it is today.
June News from IGDORE - mailchi.mp/b4ef699c967f/igdo…
Read about Carl Salk who left the university system for freer research – and meet IGDORE Sweden's new Board Chair.
Lucija Batinovic retweeted
Does anyone know of any opportunities (research, industry, academia, etc.) for a recent college grad with a B.S. in Neuroscience (3.8 GPA - graduated two years early) and lots of research experience (western blotting, immunohistochemistry, cell culture, flow cytometry, ELISAs)?
Lucija Batinovic retweeted
Replying to @MatthewBJane @Luce10101
Please don’t let it be problem behavior + intelligence. Please no
Nathan getting news outlets to report more on the plane accidents just to lay the grounds for the second season doesn’t even sound farfetched
Nathan Fielder watching all the plane accidents this year knowing it’s the worst thing for society but the best thing for #TheRehearsal
For people who published/conducted Stage 2 registered reports, have you ever had issues that required significant deviations from the Stage 1 and how have you handled this? Are there any instances where this did not lead to rejection?
Lucija Batinovic retweeted
After @UniLeidenNews proactively caved to gov threats by shutting down our international psych BA program, our newsletter now includes this blog calling for defending academic freedom in...the US.
‘Don’t just give in; defend academic freedom’.
You do see the irony, right?
Lucija Batinovic retweeted
The meta-analysis on the relationship between Fluoride and IQ by Taylor et al. (2025) that RFK Jr. has cited contains major methodological flaws and data integrity issues that we describe in the following pre-print (submitted to meta-psychology): osf.io/preprints/osf/zhm54_v…
BREAKING: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he plans to tell CDC to stop recommending fluoride in drinking water. apnews.com/article/fluoride-…
Lucija Batinovic retweeted
It's absolutely amazing the a PCIRR Stage 2 community endorsed manuscript automatically is accepted in a journal like Royal Society Open Science with no additional peer review needed.
Go PCIRR friendly journals!
rr.peercommunityin.org/about…
Why aren't there more journals joining?
Lucija Batinovic retweeted
I'm very grateful to have received a VICI grant. I'll work on the meaningful interpretation of effect sizes in psychology. It's an amazing opportunity to be able to create a team to work on this challenge in the next five years. nwo.nl/onderzoeksprogrammas/…
Lucija Batinovic retweeted
Svenska forskningsfinansiärer förespråkar i allt större utsträckning öppen vetenskap, men granskning av ansökningar om forskningsmedel sker fortfarande bakom stängda dörrar utan återkoppling till de sökande. Om du tycker att detta är märkligt, kommentera gärna eller skriv under min debattartikel om öppen granskning av ansökningar.
docs.google.com/document/d/1…




















