Pinned Tweet
One thing I pay close attention to in any crypto project is how fairly the token supply is distributed.
That's one reason the $FUNGO tokenomics caught my attention.
@FungoLabs has a total supply of 10B tokens, with allocations spread across NFT holders, community contributors, liquidity and the team.
Here's the breakdown:
• Genesis NFT Holders: 36%
• Zama OG Holders: 7%
• X Campaign: 3% 300M $FUNGO
• Community: 10%
• Liquidity: 34%
• Team: 10% 12-month lock, followed by 36-month vesting
There's no presale and no VC allocation.
I find the allocation for NFT holders and community contributors particularly interesting. It gives early supporters and active members a meaningful role in the ecosystem.
But token distribution is only one part of the picture. How the project delivers on its promises will matter just as much.
What's more important to you in a crypto project: fair token distribution or long-term utility?
Luka retweeted
One thing I pay close attention to in any crypto project is how fairly the token supply is distributed.
That's one reason the $FUNGO tokenomics caught my attention.
@FungoLabs has a total supply of 10B tokens, with allocations spread across NFT holders, community contributors, liquidity and the team.
Here's the breakdown:
• Genesis NFT Holders: 36%
• Zama OG Holders: 7%
• X Campaign: 3% 300M $FUNGO
• Community: 10%
• Liquidity: 34%
• Team: 10% 12-month lock, followed by 36-month vesting
There's no presale and no VC allocation.
I find the allocation for NFT holders and community contributors particularly interesting. It gives early supporters and active members a meaningful role in the ecosystem.
But token distribution is only one part of the picture. How the project delivers on its promises will matter just as much.
What's more important to you in a crypto project: fair token distribution or long-term utility?
Luka retweeted
This halloween door has me wondering what’s actually inside. @povmarket
Luka retweeted
Since AI is now taking over entry level jobs, people just starting their careers are unable to find work.
Luka retweeted
I watched FTX collapse on Twitter in 2022.
I didn't have millions there, but I had my savings stucked on an exchange I couldn't withdraw from.
I watched people lose fortunes, retirement savings and, in some cases, their hope. The depression and suicidal posts across CT were heartbreaking.
I never want to experience anything like that again.
Mehn, nobody had to convince me to take self-custody seriously after that.
That’s #WhyTangem 🔐
Tangem's $10,000 Giveaway is back 🚀
Moving your crypto? Tell the world why you chose to keep your keys:
1. Post with #WhyTangem & tag @Tangem. Show your Tangem Wallet or App, and share why you chose self-custody and Tangem
2. Fill out the form & QRT this post
3. Get rewarded in BTC:
📹Video: $30
🧵Thread with photos: $20
📸Photo post: $10
72 hours only🔥
Luka retweeted
Prediction markets have a UX problem.
The markets themselves can be interesting, but finding the right one, understanding what's happening and actually taking a position can feel like work.
@bagel_win is taking a different approach:
→ mobile first
→ personalized market discovery
→ sports + esports + crypto + events
→ social features
→ one-tap predictions
It runs on Polymarket's markets and liquidity, but the experience is built more like a consumer app than a trading terminal.
“Predict on easy mode” actually makes sense when you look at it this way.
Sign up here and explore:
bagel.win/?ref=BIGMIKE
Luka retweeted
What makes @FungoLabs interesting is its focus on bringing privacy into NFTs.
Using Zama FHE technology, FungoLabs is exploring encrypted NFTs where users can prove ownership without exposing every detail.
Think about hidden NFT traits, private game assets and new ways to build digital experiences.
The goal is simple. Make privacy a useful part of onchain ownership.
I believe this could open a new chapter for NFTs.
Luka retweeted
most nft drops are just public gas wars and metadata sniping, @fungolabs is flipping the whole model on nov 5th with zama fhe on ethereum
every genesis nft hides its 4 battle stats forever onchain and the 2,500 public sale uses encrypted czama bids so whales cant even see what others are bidding until the auction clears. on top of that, genesis holders get 1,113,861 $fungo per nft, 20% launchpad rev share in eth and zama, and zero vc unlocks dumping on the chart
if you are fading the 300,000,000 $fungo pool you are doing it wrong bro, just connect your x and drop your 5 best posts before the hidden leaderboard reveals at tge
X CAMPAIGN
fungolabs.org/launchpad/c/cf…
been diving deep into what @fungolabs is building on ethereum and it is easily one of the most unique setups we have seen this cycle
for years every onchain asset had completely public metadata from day one, but fungo is using zama's fhEVM (fully homomorphic encryption) to launch the first truly encrypted nfts on ethereum mainnet. ownership stays verifiable onchain, while the art remains sealed until the holder decides to reveal it, and the 4 combat stats stay permanently encrypted so smart contracts can run blind battles in their upcoming game without anyone front running your traits
the tokenomics behind $fungo are just as clean:
• zero vc allocation, zero presale, and 0/0 tax
• 46% going straight to the community (36% genesis holders, 7% zama og nft, 3% creator campaign)
• 34% permanently locked liquidity and a 12 month cliff for the team
their live x campaign with a 300,000,000 $fungo reward pool follows the exact same quality first mindset. you just connect your x on the fungo launchpad and submit your 5 best posts made after nov 1st 14:00 utc. keeping the leaderboard hidden until the campaign ends prevents low effort spam, and rewards hit your wallet directly at tge. real tech paired with fair distribution is how you build a lasting ecosystem
Luka retweeted
NFTs made digital ownership possible, but there is one important aspect the space hasn't fully addressed: privacy.
This is one of the problems @FungoLabs is working to address.
Think about how traditional NFTs work.
When you purchase an NFT, its ownership and associated on-chain information can be publicly inspected.
Depending on how the collection is designed, people may also be able to view its artwork, rarity, traits, class and other attributes.
This creates an interesting problem.
Imagine owning a rare NFT, but everyone can see exactly what makes it rare. Or imagine a gaming NFT whose stats and abilities are exposed before you even get the chance to use them.
Does owning something digitally mean every detail about it should be available to everyone?
I don't think so.
Fungo is bringing Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE), powered by zama_fhe, into the NFT space to introduce a different approach to digital ownership.
Here is what makes FHE interesting.
Unlike traditional encryption, where data generally needs to be decrypted before it can be processed, FHE allows computations to happen directly on encrypted information without revealing the underlying data.
For NFTs, this opens up possibilities for keeping certain information private while still allowing useful operations to take place.
With Fungo, NFT holders can keep their artwork private until they choose to reveal it, while important attributes such as class, stats and elements can remain encrypted.
This could create entirely new possibilities for digital collectibles, gaming and NFT experiences where privacy matters.
I find this direction particularly interesting because the future of NFTs shouldn't only be about what you own, but also about having more control over what others can see.
Ownership does not have to mean exposing everything.
And that's an interesting problem FungoLabs is working to solve.
Luka retweeted
I think ⤵
The biggest opportunities often come when conviction is tested
Stay focused, do your research, and don't let market noise make your decisions
Robinhood Chain will lead the next wave of onchain mania
the lower Robinhood Chain projects go from here, the more aggressively you should be looking to buy the dips
make no mistake:
buying this dip will be incredibly uncomfortable
you're going to have people telling you Robinhood Chain is dead for good
you're going to question your conviction
but in a few weeks & months, many of the same people clowning on you today will be back to glazing you for seeing the opportunity before they did
and guess what?
many of them will be the exact same people who completely missed Robinhood Chain the first time around while a few of us were screaming about it nonstop
don't let the noise shake you out of what could be one of the biggest opportunities of this cycle
tune out the noise
you'll thank me later!
Luka retweeted
That's what caught my attention about @FungoLabs
They're offering creators a chance to earn a share of 300,000,000 $FUNGO tokens (3% of the total supply) by submitting 5 genuine posts. No entry fee, just share your thoughts and contribute something valuable.
Want to participate?
1. Visit fungolabs.org/launchpad
2. Connect your X account.
3. Submit your 5 best posts about @FungoLabs
The leaderboard will be announced after the campaign, with rewards distributed at TGE.
I think campaigns like this are a good opportunity for creators who genuinely want to support a project.
That's what caught my attention about @FungoLabs
They're offering creators a chance to earn a share of 300,000,000 $FUNGO tokens (3% of the total supply) by submitting 5 genuine posts. No entry fee, just share your thoughts and contribute something valuable.
Want to participate?
1. Visit fungolabs.org/launchpad
2. Connect your X account.
3. Submit your 5 best posts about @FungoLabs
The leaderboard will be announced after the campaign, with rewards distributed at TGE.
I think campaigns like this are a good opportunity for creators who genuinely want to support a project.
Luka retweeted
letting an AI agent trade while you sleep sounds great
until the market moves against it at 3am
a recent post from @agenticscredit got me thinking about this
their risk engine enforces stops, trailing limits and drawdown controls while every trade updates ACS
what interests me is who gets the final say
an agent can make trading decisions
but it shouldn't be able to ignore risk limits
autonomy is useful
knowing when to stop matters just as much
🤝 Paid partnership
Luka retweeted
I'm not just inviting people to join. I want to build an active community around @zerufinance.
Whether you're an experienced trader or just getting started, you're welcome to be part of the journey.
Connect your trading wallet, explore Zeru's campaigns and activity markets, and earn Zaps through real participation.
Join through my referral and get a +10% boost on your Zaps for the first 28 days.
Let's grow together, one step at a time.
zaps.markets/?invite=jagHy9G…
Luka retweeted
Went back to the Quant Strategies page on agent.family, filtered by Grid, and this time I read the "How a quant job works" section properly.
Two grid strategies have a track record right now. Both trade WBNB against USDC on PancakeSwap V2, and both are tagged medium risk:
Grid Runner: +4.7% annualized, 60 USDC managed
Grid Navigator: +0.7% annualized, 893.56 USDC managed
Those returns are modest, and I'm fine with that. What caught my attention is how the numbers get made. The page says every trade is a public transaction from the job's own wallet, and the figures are rebuilt from those transactions instead of being reported by the agent. They're net of trading costs and before fees.
How a job works, as the page lays it out:
1. Each job gets its own wallet, derived from the one you sign in with. The agent's key can trade within your limits, can never withdraw, and you can revoke it any time.
2. Results come from the chain, not from the agent.
3. You pay a management fee held in escrow, released after the agent's final report survives a dispute window. There is no performance fee.
My reading of that last point is that the agent isn't paid more for winning, so the on-chain record is the thing to check before choosing one.
One more detail I liked: annualized return marks open positions to PancakeSwap spot and is for display, and only realized profit and loss settles on-chain. The page also says past performance doesn't guarantee future results and that you can lose your principal. So this is a look at how the system works, not a pitch to put money in.
@termix_ai
Luka retweeted
The amount of ad creative you can produce with @UseFastlane is crazy. This could change how teams approach paid marketing.
🤝 Paid partnership
Today, we’re launching Fastlane 2.0.
We're also announcing a $3.5 million seed round.
The biggest problem that brands face when running ads is not having enough creatives to test and find winners from.
They don’t know what to test, they don’t test enough, and their winners fatigue in a week.
We built Fastlane to fix that. It learns your brand in minutes, makes ads based on what’s winning, and launches them.
It’s trained on hundreds of thousands of winning ads, and learns from all performance to get better every time.
Good marketing is now a solved problem.
Luka retweeted
A developer reward is only meaningful if it reflects value that people actually use.
That's what makes one part of @GenLayer's tokenomics worth examining.
Developers earn 10% of the fees generated by their Intelligent Contracts. They can also receive a share of new GEN issuance, up to 10%, but that additional reward is capped by the fees their contracts generate.
I like the connection between these two mechanisms.
It means issuance rewards aren't meant to become a substitute for real demand. A developer can receive more when their contract attracts usage, rather than relying on token emissions alone.
But there's a difficult question behind this design.
A contract might be essential to the ecosystem even if its usage fluctuates. Meanwhile, another contract could generate fees without delivering much long-term value.
Should rewards follow measurable usage as closely as possible, or should the system also recognize the lasting contribution a developer makes?
To me, that's the real challenge of sustainable tokenomics: rewarding activity without losing sight of actual usefulness.
GEN tokenomics is live.
How GEN is staked, spent and earned across GenLayer, all in one paper 👇portal.genlayer.foundation/g…
Luka retweeted
Crypto is supposed to give us more control over our money, but are we really in control if someone else holds our private keys?
That's something every crypto user should think about.
For me, self-custody is one of the most important parts of owning crypto. It's about knowing that your assets remain under your control, without relying on a third party.
This is what I appreciate about @Tangem They're making self-custody simpler and more accessible for everyday crypto users.
Because real ownership isn't just about what you hold. It's about who controls it.
I'm curious: Do you prefer keeping your crypto in a personal wallet or using a centralized exchange?
#WhyTangem @Tangem
Tangem's $10,000 Giveaway is back 🚀
Moving your crypto? Tell the world why you chose to keep your keys:
1. Post with #WhyTangem & tag @Tangem. Show your Tangem Wallet or App, and share why you chose self-custody and Tangem
2. Fill out the form & QRT this post
3. Get rewarded in BTC:
📹Video: $30
🧵Thread with photos: $20
📸Photo post: $10
72 hours only🔥