Pinned Tweet
Opus 5.5 could turn every AI agent run into an improvement for the next one.
It turns corrections into reusable skills, tests, rules and memory, so your AI system gets smarter instead of starting from scratch.
In this article, I show you how.
Opus 5.5 is great for motion design but...
add /mechanica to turn Claude into a cinematic mechanical motion design studio
• Realistic 3D engines with individually modeled moving parts
• Cinematic exploded-view animations with smooth camera movements and detailed reveals
• Interactive 3D cutaways, airflow simulations, and components you can pull apart
send this to your Claude:
mechanica-atlas.vercel.app/
Lunar retweeted
Opus 5.5 + /anatomy-reveal is f*cking insane for motion design
• Real 3D anatomy reveals from a photo or name
• Exploded views with moving parts
• Clean motion films with typography, blur, and studio-level transitions
This is basically a motion design studio inside Claude
Send these skills to your Claude: typingmind.com/skills/annngu… skills.wheresryan.sh/anatomy
A DGX Spark, half a cow and a flamethrower is a crazy prize pool for a hackathon.
But that's kind of what makes this one fun.
It's basically built for devs, vibe coders, indie hackers and AI builders who just need an excuse to finally ship something.
Build an app, deploy it on Synteq, and QRT the announcement with proof it's live.
Everyone also gets $20 in free credits to start.
🤝 Paid partnership
Vibecode an app and win a supercomputer.
Or half a Cow 🐂 and a Flamethrower 🔥...
Introducing Synteq Hack(athon).
We’re giving out a DGX Spark, AirPods Max, Chipotle credits and more, plus get $20 in free credits to start building.
synteq.com/hack
Andrej Karpathy:
"Prompting is going away. Delete everything, keep Graph."
In just 69 minutes, he shows how to build graphs and why they're the only layer that survives in the end
Prompts → Agents → Loops → Graphs
a loop keeps one agent running until the job is done
a graph decides which agents exist and what each one passes to the next
anyone can build an agent, almost nobody builds the graph that runs them
watch it today, then save the full guide on graphs below before everyone starts catching up ↓
example with motion design: xitter.cf/LunarResearcher/status…
Opus 5.5 + /anatomy-reveal is f*cking insane for motion design
• Real 3D anatomy reveals from a photo or name
• Exploded views with moving parts
• Clean motion films with typography, blur, and studio-level transitions
This is basically a motion design studio inside Claude
Send these skills to your Claude: typingmind.com/skills/annngu… skills.wheresryan.sh/anatomy
Opus 5.5 + /anatomy-reveal is f*cking insane for motion design
• Real 3D anatomy reveals from a photo or name
• Exploded views with moving parts
• Clean motion films with typography, blur, and studio-level transitions
This is basically a motion design studio inside Claude
Send these skills to your Claude: typingmind.com/skills/annngu… skills.wheresryan.sh/anatomy
Space Bunny was already strong, and M3.1 Flash is basically the improved version of it.
The score that stands out to me is 74% on DeepSWE, because that points directly to stronger coding capability for real agent workflows. I can rely more on it.
And it's doing that while running 3x faster than M3. I’d say it’s the best-value Flash model for agentic coding right now.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: Space Performance + Bunny Speed
🚀🐰 Yes, Space Bunny - which has topped global leaderboards with 200T+ tokens - was an earlier version of M3.1 Flash.
💰Redefining the performance economics of agentic AI. M3.1 Flash achieves frontier-level intelligence across key tasks such as Cowork (Automation-Bench: 62%; ALE: 30%), Coding (DeepSWE: 74%) and Visual Reasoning (BabyVision: 91%), at 1/3 the cost of M3 and 3x the speed.
API pricing (flat rate): $0.15 / $0.60 per 1M input/output tokens, with cache reads at $0.015 / 1M tokens.
Model weights will arrive on Oct 23.
API: platform.minimax.io
M Plan: minimax.io/m-plan
MiniMax Code for desktop: agent.minimax.io/download
Google Brain founder Andrew Ng:
"100% of my tasks are done by AI agents. Loops and Graphs did it. Prompting is gone."
In just 30 minutes, he explains how self-improving agents actually work and what makes them possible
Chat → Agents → Loops → Graphs
a loop delivers finished work instead of just a draft
a graph decides what gets worked on before anything starts running
worth more than most $500 agentic engineering courses, and it's completely free
watch it today
then save the full graph engineering guide below before everyone starts catching up ↓
Lunar retweeted
Andrej Karpathy:
"Prompting is going away. Delete everything, keep Graph."
In just 69 minutes, he shows how to build graphs and why they're the only layer that survives in the end
Prompts → Agents → Loops → Graphs
a loop keeps one agent running until the job is done
a graph decides which agents exist and what each one passes to the next
anyone can build an agent, almost nobody builds the graph that runs them
watch it today, then save the full guide on graphs below before everyone starts catching up ↓
whoever leaked this has bigger balls than sense
someone at Anthropic put 80 AI helpers on one project, gave them twelve hours, and measured what actually came back usable
the two older models turned in 980 and 876 finished pieces of work, and almost none of it was worth keeping
turns out the newest helpers won for a reason nobody wants to hear: they went into their own corners and stopped touching each other's work
i pointed two helpers at one document last week and got two confident versions of it
i kept the one i wrote myself
Claude Opus 5.5 is the version of this you can actually use: one early tester had it audit and fix 200,000 lines of code in under three hours
the older Opus 5 needed more than 20 hours for the same job
you already pay around $20 a month for one chat window, and the setup that won in that report is simple:
one helper with one job it owns
run it tonight in the chat you already have, it takes 3 moves
write the one job each helper owns in a single sentence before opening a second chat
keep every helper in its own chat with one document, so two of them never rewrite the same thing
add a third only when you can clearly say what it owns without repeating a job that's already taken
save this, then open the piece below
read the full guide below
Lunar retweeted
this is seriously getting out of hand.
someone figured out that the most powerful way to use Grok and Claude Opus isn't to ask them questions.
it's to make them investigate each other's answers.
and the interface looks like something out of a classified intelligence agency.
it's called ECLIPSE.
most people still open ChatGPT, ask one question, trust the answer and move on.
this takes the exact opposite approach.
Grok hunts for information. Opus tries to find everything wrong with it. neither gets to call something a discovery until the other has challenged it.
the entire setup comes down to 4 moves:
→ give Grok one question: "what's happening right now that almost nobody is paying attention to?"
→ let it connect news, market movements, public data and seemingly unrelated events
→ send those connections to Opus, whose only job is to attack the reasoning, look for missing evidence and expose weak conclusions
→ put everything into one intelligence terminal where the strongest connections rise to the surface and the noise disappears
now look at the screen.
every node is a potential connection. every line is a relationship worth questioning. every anomaly is something that might deserve a closer look.
and here's what people are missing:
the advantage isn't having the smartest AI.
it's having two different AIs that aren't allowed to blindly agree.
one searches.
one challenges.
you investigate what survives.
no copying answers between 12 tabs.
no reading the same explanation rewritten five different ways.
no pretending a confident answer is automatically a correct one.
2 models. 1 intelligence terminal. an entirely different way to investigate information.
we spent the last three years learning how to talk to AI.
the next shift is learning how to make AI systems question each other.
and most people are still arguing over which chatbot is better.
steal this and read full guide below
this is seriously getting out of hand.
someone figured out that the most powerful way to use Grok and Claude Opus isn't to ask them questions.
it's to make them investigate each other's answers.
and the interface looks like something out of a classified intelligence agency.
it's called ECLIPSE.
most people still open ChatGPT, ask one question, trust the answer and move on.
this takes the exact opposite approach.
Grok hunts for information. Opus tries to find everything wrong with it. neither gets to call something a discovery until the other has challenged it.
the entire setup comes down to 4 moves:
→ give Grok one question: "what's happening right now that almost nobody is paying attention to?"
→ let it connect news, market movements, public data and seemingly unrelated events
→ send those connections to Opus, whose only job is to attack the reasoning, look for missing evidence and expose weak conclusions
→ put everything into one intelligence terminal where the strongest connections rise to the surface and the noise disappears
now look at the screen.
every node is a potential connection. every line is a relationship worth questioning. every anomaly is something that might deserve a closer look.
and here's what people are missing:
the advantage isn't having the smartest AI.
it's having two different AIs that aren't allowed to blindly agree.
one searches.
one challenges.
you investigate what survives.
no copying answers between 12 tabs.
no reading the same explanation rewritten five different ways.
no pretending a confident answer is automatically a correct one.
2 models. 1 intelligence terminal. an entirely different way to investigate information.
we spent the last three years learning how to talk to AI.
the next shift is learning how to make AI systems question each other.
and most people are still arguing over which chatbot is better.
steal this and read full guide below
Lunar retweeted
Andrej Karpathy:
"Prompting is slowly fading away
Delete everything else and keep the graph"
In this 1-hour lecture, he explains how to build graphs and why they're the layer that survives
The part most people overlook:
LLMs → Prompts → Agents → Graphs
Everything before the graph is just another step
The graph is where the system eventually ends up
Watch it first
Then read the full guide on graph engineering below
Personal agents get a lot more interesting once they stop living in one app.
Photon 2.0 is pushing that pretty hard.
Your agent can now reach you through Email, Voice, Telegram, SMS, WhatsApp and more.
So the same agent can text you, call you, or show up wherever you already spend time instead of making you open another interface.
That feels like the direction agents were always supposed to go.
Photon is also giving Beta users $100 in credits to try the new setup.
🤝 Paid partnership
We are giving $100 to everyone building messaging agents.
Introducing Photon 2.0: bring your agent to iMessage, voice, email, WhatsApp, Telegram, and SMS in one click.
Claim your credits → photon.codes/beta
Andrej Karpathy:
"Prompting is slowly fading away
Delete everything else and keep the graph"
In this 1-hour lecture, he explains how to build graphs and why they're the layer that survives
The part most people overlook:
LLMs → Prompts → Agents → Graphs
Everything before the graph is just another step
The graph is where the system eventually ends up
Watch it first
Then read the full guide on graph engineering below
One of the dumbest parts of AI video right now is getting a clip you actually like, then having to regenerate it because the sound is wrong.
That's why MireloAI SFX 2.0 makes sense to me.
Keep the video. Keep the dialogue. Rebuild just the sound effects and ambience around what's actually happening on screen.
No re-prompting the whole clip, no digging through sound libraries, and it can keep the same sound consistent across cuts.
Feels like a pretty obvious missing piece for AI video workflows.
Just try @MireloAI.
🤝 Paid partnership
AI Videos finally sound real.
Introducing Mirelo SFX 2.0.
It watches your video, cuts the music you never prompted, keeps the dialogue, and builds a full sound design synced to the action and consistent across any length clips.
You’ve made it look right. We’ll make it sound right.
Live today through our API, on @runwayml and @fal.
Other platforms coming soon. (Thread)
Tobi Lütke (Shopify CEO) just released Shop MCP. This prompt turns Opus 5.5 into an AI shopping agent that actually finds, compares, and prepares purchases from 1B+ products.
It's f*cking unreal...
Send it to Opus 5.5, and thank me later. Then read the full guide for Opus 5.5 Shopping Agent Engineering.
Lunar retweeted
Dylan Field (Figma CEO) just released a prompt that turns Opus 5.5 into a design-to-code factory that actually builds and ships working apps from Figma designs.
It's f*cking unreal...
Send it to Opus 5.5, and thank me later. Then read the full guide for Opus 5.5 Design-to-Code Engineering.
Dylan Field (Figma CEO) just released a prompt that turns Opus 5.5 into a design-to-code factory that actually builds and ships working apps from Figma designs.
It's f*cking unreal...
Send it to Opus 5.5, and thank me later. Then read the full guide for Opus 5.5 Design-to-Code Engineering.














