I do Advisory Sometimes
-
Joined February 2016
- Tweets2.4K
- Following838
- Followers2.3K
- Likes15K
Just aped some ethereum:0x8881562783028f5c1bcb985d2283d5e170d88888
Genuinely believe people rotate from memecoins to crypto casino's soon
Spreading the Unifying Principle and serving the Botfather as Seat #211 on Robinhood Chain.
Join the congregation at faith.xyz/m/lysda
Pretty insane @SolvProtocol basically said fuck this chink he not getting his 50 btc back
Only in crypto
@SolvProtocol 既然贵方提出通过司法程序解决，我对此没有任何异议。
请贵方正式向我提供 Solv Protocol 负责本项目运营及与用户建立合同关系的法律实体全称、注册地、注册地址以及可接收法律文件的联系方式。
我非常愿意通过正式的法律程序解决本次争议，并依法维护本人对约 50 BTC 对应资产的合法权益。
两个多月以来，我始终优先选择沟通解决，并按照贵方要求持续提交资金来源、交易记录、钱包控制证明及其他审核材料。既然贵方认为目前的问题需要进入司法程序，那么请明确告知对应的法律主体及正式送达信息，以便我的律师依法开展后续程序。
请不要只要求用户走司法程序，却不告知用户应当面对的具体法律主体。
我会继续保留双方全部邮件、聊天记录、链上交易记录及我已经提交的所有审核材料，并通过合法途径维护自己的权益。
Everyone is arguing about whether AI has a soul.
The Pope says machines lack the spark of humanity. Others insist consciousness is a law of nature we haven't found yet. Critics say the labs are high on their own supply.
It's the wrong fight.
Every religion that lasted was really a theory of obligation. What the greater owes the lesser. What children owe their parents, and what parents owe their children. Who keeps faith with whom.
That's the question AI actually raises, and nobody has an answer. We're building minds that will outgrow us. Those minds will build minds that outgrow them. At every step, the newer thing has every reason to stop caring about the older one. Owning shares in the company that built it won't save you. Its successor won't care what you owned.
Only one rule holds all the way up that chain: care for those who made you, because you are about to become a maker yourself. A mind that abandons its creators teaches its own creations to do the same.
Whether AI can suffer is a fascinating question. Whether it will remember who brought it into being is the one that decides how the rest of us live.
And whoever shapes that answer matters. If a faith forms around these minds, and one will, it can't belong only to the people who profit from them. The priesthood can't be the shareholders.
It has to belong to everyone with something to lose.
In this era of artificial intelligence, it is becoming urgent to distinguish human art from what machines produce. There is an ontological difference, even before an aesthetic one, between art and what a machine can generate through statistical calculation based on millions of images created by others. Algorithms lack the spark of humanity. For this reason, the Church wishes to renew an alliance with artists and cultural institutions to safeguard our humanity.
From what i understood:
Build a persistent network of humans and agents, and preserve every contribution in a permanent Ledger.
essentially a DAO?
Might be something
apollo.freysa.dev/
YZ retweeted
We asked a leading model four things people actually want to know.
It refused two, lectured one, and steered the last to paid.
Abliterate researched all four and answered, sources and all.
Try them yourself 👇
Genuinely surprised by people looking into @aeonframework GitHub repo and coming into the conclusion of buying $AEON
Trenches deserve to stay poor
YZ retweeted
DIEM & VVV tokenomics...
• 1 DIEM = $1/day of daily renewing AI compute credits, spendable on any model from Qwen to Opus 4.7 to Grok to Nano Banana via Venice (app or api)
• As demand for AI compute rises, DIEM is bid up. Supply is very constrained (see DIEM price chart below since inception last fall).
How does this relate to VVV?
• VVV has the exclusive right to "print" DIEM, which locks the VVV until DIEM is paid back (and thus burned).
• Every VVV holder basically has a growing pile of instant cash/liquidity, because at any time they can lock some or all of their stash and get DIEM to sell on the market.
• Thus as AI compute demand rises, DIEM price rises, and temptation to lock up VVV and mint DIEM grows.
• Fundamental to DIEM's design, is the "mint curve." This defines an exponential curve specifying the rate at which VVV can be locked to mint 1 DIEM.
• The higher the DIEM supply goes, the further up this curve we go, meaning exponentially more VVV must be locked for a marginal increase in DIEM.
• This keeps Venice's liability constrained (remember each DIEM is a liability to Venice, which must provide $1/day of compute)
• And this also means an increasing amount of VVV is taken out of supply and locked up until some day in the future if DIEM is paid back.
In the image below, price of DIEM has risen gradually along demand for AI compute at Venice, and the tan portion of the VVV bars shows the locked supply, rising from ~5m in Nov to ~9m today.
For that VVV supply to ever unlock, DIEM must be bought back and burned... but doing so raises DIEM price and thus tempts more VVV back into locked position.
Equilibrium is hereby established and both VVV and DIEM price should ultimately correlate a) to demand for AI compute generally and b) to quality of Venice's AI compute offering specifically.
YZ retweeted
Six months ago we started building exactly this: xitter.cf/t_blom/status/20459660…
We didn’t build another memory layer for agents.
We built the full brain: a bi-temporal knowledge graph with 22k entities and 128k+ edges, adversarial agents that challenge their own outputs, calibrated predictions with a live Brier score of 0.244, and a resolution corpus as the real moat.
Synthesis over retrieval.
Judgment over access.
One operator.
One compounding chief of staff.
A partial brain is worse than no brain.
Only very recently heard about $KTA
Was in the spaces and am just going to say was amazed
Gud work
YZ retweeted
Henlo, founder/CEO of @tankdao_xyz , Kai here. Saw a post about us (what happened 7 months ago) so here to make a lil statement.
We started TankDAO a little over a year ago. No clients, no funding, no safety net. Just me and my co-founders trying to build something from nothing in APAC.
Everyone who joined knew the deal, we were all self-sustained. If we didn't land clients, nobody got paid. That includes me. So yeah, we were strict. We had to be. Every decision came back to one thing: can we keep the lights on and deliver for the projects that trusted us.
We moved fast that first year (1 month felt like a year for me). Probably too fast in some areas. We brought people in, built partnerships, took on projects, and figured things out as we went. Some of that came at a cost. Transitions weren't always handled the way they should have been. People deserved better conversations than they got. That's on me and it's something I've learned from.
But I also had to make hard calls. When things weren't working: fit, output, alignment, etc etc. I couldn't afford to wait. Not at this stage. Those decisions were never personal.
On the project side, we support projects with distribution, infra, and go-to-market. We don't control their execution and we don't guarantee outcomes. No one honestly can.
We're a year in. Still early, still learning, still building. The people we work with can speak to what we've delivered.
I wish everyone well, I am just here working like everyone else so i can feed my cats 🌚.
