Average Swedish dad. When the kids are sound asleep I drop Netflix in favor of late night research figuring out how Western propaganda brainwashes us.
Sweden
Joined November 2019
- Tweets31.4K
- Following632
- Followers2K
- Likes19.7K
Martin retweeted
Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the grave of his older brother, Viktor, who died in the Nazi Siege of Leningrad.
Out of a pre-war population of 3.2 million people, 1 million civilians died during the Siege. That’s almost 1 in 3 people.
This doesn’t even count Red Army losses.
The unspeakable atrocities committed by Germany against Russia are not taught in schools in NATO nations.
On this day in 1941, Nazi Germany and its allies begin the Siege of Leningrad, one of the longest, brutal & destructive sieges in history.
It would last for 2 years, 4 months, 2 weeks & 5 days. The goal was not to occupy the city, but to starve it into extinction.
By early 1942, an estimated 100,000 people were dying in Leningrad a month, mostly from starvation. Due to the desperation, at the worst point of the siege, workers only received 250 grams of bread a day, their dependents only received 125 grams.
In total desperation, people boiled wallpaper paste for starch, chewed their leather belts, and even scraped glue from furniture to eat.
The harsh cold of the Russian winter was faced with no electricity, no heat, and no fuel, with Leningrad’s citizens freezing to death in -30 degrees Celsius.
Up to 1.5 million Red Army soldiers & civilians died in the siege in a heroic sacrifice to ensure that the city does not fall to the Nazis.
Adolf Hitler wanted to wipe out the city bearing Vladimir Lenin’s name, and exterminate the population who he viewed as sub-human. The resilience of the people of Leningrad outlasted defeated Hitler’s hatred.
Martin retweeted
A NOTE ON THE VICTORY OF ALTERNATIVE FOR GERMANY (AfD)
In democratic regional elections, German voters handed one party – AfD – a decisive victory. This is the sovereign decision of voters in a sovereign country, and therefore it is inappropriate to portray the election result as the end of democracy or as something terrifying.
Generally speaking, when governing parties fail to address illegal migration, adopt militant positions and support wars, and refuse to acknowledge the alarming impact of European climate policy on competitiveness, they lose elections and are replaced by other parties that often offer simple, but nevertheless concrete, solutions.
I have only one wish: that this result in the German regional elections does not lead to war with Russia being presented as the only way to distract from the defeat of the governing parties. Because, as the old saying goes, Germany does not make small mistakes.
Martin retweeted
Ukraine and its European values:
Footage shows a group of people beating a man for his dissenting opinion, for criticizing the conscription centers, the forced use of the Ukrainian language, and corrupt individuals.
After the beating, the man is threatened and told to shut up and delete his own social media account, or he himself will be deleted.
It is obvious that there is no freedom of expression, pluralism, or democracy in Ukraine; it is telling that the regime, in this state, wants to join its friends in the EU...
Martin retweeted
Dass am Stand der ukrainischen Veteranenvereinigung NS-Symbole zur Schau gestellt wurden, störte den Verteidigungsminister bei seinem Rundgang am Sonntag auf dem Veteranentag in Berlin nicht.
Weitere Eindrücke vom Veteranentag findet ihr hier: jungewelt.de/artikel/525130.…
Martin retweeted
My neurodivergent friends who are scientists tell me with the number of neurodivergent scientists “it is far more likely autism causes vaccines”
Martin retweeted
You literally sanctioned me for exercising my freedom of speech.
Freedom of speech is the foundation of our strong and vibrant European democracy.
We are proud of it. We will protect it.
Because the @EU_Commission is the guardian of our values.
Martin retweeted
The U.S. Tomahawk missiles that struck a girls' school in Iran were manufactured using components from the United Kingdom.
The school was struck two or even three times.
It was no accident.
Martin retweeted
Reflecting on Scott Adams' viral bombshell: "The anti-vaxxers clearly won, you're the winners"? Dropped three years ago, it hits deeper now after his passing from prostate cancer. Deeply grateful for his courage in speaking out.
Martin retweeted
Senator Lindsey Graham says that the United States needs to give Ukraine Tomahawk missiles and needs to “go all in” if Russia rejects this new peace deal.
Lindsey is one of the worst, this is just pathetic.
Martin retweeted
"The Amish are a perfect example of a large group of people who are largely unvaccinated."
"And we can't find an autistic kid who is unvaccinated."
"You just don't find any of these chronic diseases in the Amish."
Martin retweeted
17% vs. 57%: The Staggering Chronic Illness Difference Between Unvaxxed and Vaxxed Kids A Major Study Found—Before It Was Buried.
A bombshell revelation from attorney Aaron Siri exposes a systemic corruption of science that has left parents in the dark for decades.
Leading up to 2013, the U.S. government paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review ALL existing science to confirm the safety of the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule.
Their finding? “The studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule… have not been conducted.”
They found ZERO studies comparing the long-term health of fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children. The IOM could only conclude “there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe”—a far cry from proving it is safe.
They noted such a study was possible using large medical databases. A 2015 CDC white paper even outlined how to do it. Yet, the government never did.
In 2017, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sought to answer this critical question. They met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center—a mainstream, pro-vaccine doctor who conducts clinical trials for companies like Moderna.
He agreed to conduct the study.
Using actual medical records from 2000-2016, his team compared children with no vaccines to those who had one or more. The sample was large: ~2,000 unvaxxed vs. ~16,000 vaxxed.
The results were staggering, and all statistically significant. Compared to the unvaccinated, vaccinated children had:
▪️ 4.29x higher rate of ASTHMA
▪️ 3.03x higher rate of ATOPIC DISEASE
▪️ 5.96x higher rate of AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE
▪️ 5.53x higher rate of NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS
- Including 3.28x DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY
- And 4.47x SPEECH DISORDER
For conditions like ADHD, learning disabilities, and intellectual disabilities, there were HUNDREDS of cases in the vaccinated group and ZERO in the unvaccinated.
The overarching finding: By age 10, only 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic illness. Among the vaccinated, that number skyrocketed to 57%.
This was the study that was never done. The one the IOM called for. And its findings were devastating to the official narrative.
So what happened? The study was completed in early 2020… and then buried.
Aaron Siri states that the researchers, despite affirming the study was well-designed, refused to publish it. Dr. Zervos reportedly said he “didn’t want to lose his job.” The co-author said she “did not want to make doctors uncomfortable.”
This is the corruption of science in plain sight. Studies that confirm the desired outcome are published. Those that don’t are shoved in a drawer.
We must be able to have honest science to ensure we are protecting children from infectious diseases without causing widespread chronic harm.
The public deserves the truth.
Martin retweeted
Parliament just passed a law that effectively eliminated the independence of Ukraine’s main anti-corruption bodies—the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO).
They’re now comfortably tucked into Zelensky’s pocket.
So, what do the experts on 🇺🇦 'struggling democracy' have to say about this?
And what about those who still believe Zelensky is the Second Coming?
The photo was taken from MP Zhelezniak's Telegram, who is very critical of this move.
