Andres 🇻🇦 retweeted
Christianity stands as the most beneficial. Its emphasis on an ordered, knowable universe, human dignity, and charity drove the scientific revolution, universities, hospitals, abolitionism, and modern rights. Christian-heritage societies still lead global metrics on development, freedom, and innovation.
Radical Islam has proven the most damaging today. Islamist groups account for the large majority of terrorism deaths worldwide in recent data, with associated patterns of lower development and restricted rights in many majority-Muslim countries.
Andres 🇻🇦 retweeted
‼️BOMBSHELL: The last Conservative PM of Canada, Stephen Harper goes PUBLIC
says that all 3 major news networks in Canada...."would meet to coordinate their coverage of me"
In Canada, "we have 3 MSNBCs"
Andres 🇻🇦 retweeted
The evidence of habitual, systematic, substantial plagiarism by @WesleyLHuff is overwhelming and was not contested in his response.
The only question that remains is whether this was gross negligence or whether he knew what he was doing was wrong and tried to conceal it.
Let me be clear: This is decidedly NOT mundane sloppiness. Wes’ response seems tailored to give his audience that impression, but it is not remotely plausible in light of the evidence that has been presented.
Any reasonable person in his position would have known that the ways in which he appropriated from and failed to attribute sources was not acceptable. His response is woefully inadequate because it fails to offer a plausible explanation for why he behaved in this manner that doesnt presuppose consciousness of guilt (but he also doesnt express contrition/take responsibility in a way that recognized that this implicate his moral integrity).
youtube.com/watch?v=RdrHr819…
Andres 🇻🇦 retweeted
Did Wes Huff commit plagiarism?
#maklelan3550
youtu.be/bbxN1NXmGtI
Andres 🇻🇦 retweeted
An individual known as "Dr Maleek" warns SNEAKO to fall in line, or else he will release the blackmail on him. (It's rumoured to be a sex tape with several men)
"When I see you, you're going to behave."
November 3, 2026
Andres 🇻🇦 retweeted
The only Republican to flip a seat in the house made an anti-immigration ad that appealed specifically to White people.
Andres 🇻🇦 retweeted
I met a white Dutch-descended South African girl last month. She’s a staunch liberal who supports mass immigration to Europe. Astounding, truly - “accelerationism” is bullshit.
Andres 🇻🇦 retweeted
America, it is said, is suffering from intolerance – it is not. It is suffering from tolerance. Tolerance of right and wrong, truth and error, virtue and evil, Christ, and chaos. Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded.
Andres 🇻🇦 retweeted
Republican Senate nominee Mike Rogers appearing with Democrat U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens at Perfecting Church in Detroit
Andres 🇻🇦 retweeted
Correct.
I’m seeing a lot of responses suggesting female applicants could be just that much better to account for their higher acceptance rates at MIT.
That’s probably not true by quantitative metrics, though MIT could very easily just release some raw numbers — they won’t, of course, which tells you what the answer is.
I say probably not true because if you look at male:female distributions at the top ranges of SAT scores, men outperform women by a fair degree. The College Board that administers the SAT interestingly doesn’t explicitly give score breakdowns by gender anymore (why would that be?)
Here’s some data from 2011 with M:F SAT distributions at >1500.
There are 1.5-2x more boys that score a 1500+ than there are women.
There are a lot of great options for these very smart boys not getting into MIT, and I’m sure the girls admitted are very impressive and will do fine at MIT. But let’s be honest about what’s happening here.
It’s even worse than Anish notes here because boys make up 61% of the top SAT scores. So despite that fact and the fact that men apply about 2x as often to MIT; @MIT admits more women every year than men. It’s impossible for this to be merit based. Just mathematically impossible.
Andres 🇻🇦 retweeted
It’s even worse than Anish notes here because boys make up 61% of the top SAT scores. So despite that fact and the fact that men apply about 2x as often to MIT; @MIT admits more women every year than men. It’s impossible for this to be merit based. Just mathematically impossible.
17,000 men apply to MIT
8900 women apply to MIT
600 men were accepted
612 women were accepted
If we assume male and female applicants to MIT are roughly the same, the probability this happens by chance, let alone every year for a while
The probability of a sex blind admission process creating this result is 1 in 4 × 10³¹