Manybikes retweeted
🚨 THIS is the speech that should terrify every American.
Senator Tim Sheehy just dropped the most brutal, unfiltered truth about Iran you’ll ever hear.
For 47 years the Iranian regime has been hunting us — vaporizing Marines, skinning Americans alive on camera, cutting our troops in half with EFPs, and celebrating every death.
They don’t care who you voted for.
They don’t care where you live.
They want every single one of us raped, burned, and cut into pieces.
This isn’t politics.
This is a death cult that has been at war with America since 1979… and we’ve been pretending otherwise.
Watch the full speech.
Every. Single. Second.
Then share it.
Because the regime that did this to our brothers is still standing.
Iran has never paid the real price.
It’s time they do.
Manybikes retweeted
BOOM: This is it—the “Democracy Files” top-level summary
If you’re wondering what all the buzz is about from @DataRepublican and @CynicalPublius, I walk you through it.
Sedition? Color Revolution? You decide.
Manybikes retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: A Biden-appointed judge just ordered Trump’s viral "$5,000 to Americans" ad SCRUBBED right before the midterms.
They want to silence the truth, but it’s already backfiring massively. The establishment is terrified.
Do NOT let them censor this. RETWEET AND SHARE EVERYWHERE! 🇺🇸
Manybikes retweeted
Doctors, “We accept your insurance” does not answer “What will I owe?”
A patient paying toward a deductible has every reason to compare that amount with your cash price.
Give them an offer worth considering.
Choose services you can price completely. Explain what the patient gets, put the cash price on your website, and let them book.
You do not need to solve every hospital bill in America before pricing an office visit.
Start with the care you control.
Your receptionist deserves a better sales tool than “We’ll know after the claim processes.”
Manybikes retweeted
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent,
My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov.
The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison.
I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return.
I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something.
Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act.
Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged.
Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working.
A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats.
This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried.
There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go.
Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him.
I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them.
This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one.
Three things would change the math overnight.
Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined.
End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.
And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them.
Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine.
I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it.
Respectfully,
Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
Manybikes retweeted
Elon Musk is looking for ways to cut fraud and waste from Social Security and Medicare
Here’s a big one:
Biden Signed H.R. 7691 Qualifying Refugees From Ukraine TO CLAIM SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS
- H.R. 7691 was signed into law on May 21, 2022
- H.R. 7691 also opened pathways for Ukrainian parolees to access mainstream federal benefits typically reserved for refugees, like Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and Refugee Medical Assistance (RMA)
- In October 2024, the Department of Homeland Security extended parole and work authorization for Ukrainians under the Uniting for Ukraine program, keeping them eligible for such benefits through 2025 and beyond if they reapply successfully
I’ve shared mainstream media reports confirming hundreds of thousands of Ukraine citizens are claiming American Social Security Benefits and have never paid in
“President Joe Biden Signed H.R. 7691 Qualifying Refugees From Ukraine to claim Social Security Benefits
- They're not paying into the system
- They're not from this country
- They didn't help build this country
“So riddle me this. How how how are they getting SSI checks? You know, the money that is taken out of every paycheck that we get every time we get a paycheck, that chunk of money that they take.
How are Ukrainian refugees getting SSI checks? Make me understand that. Please make me understand that. Because they're trying to work us until we die So that we don't get the SSI check. So, how?
How how is that happening? Somebody please make me understand because the math is not mathing”
Manybikes retweeted
Ukraine is not a sovereign nation. It is a rogue regime, captured by the Deep State, and serves as a proxy of the Democrats.
The Ukrainian military forces are pawns, and they are being used to damage Trump in the midterms, just like Deep State are using the IRGC to sabotage global oil prices as well.
Ukraine and Iran are proxies of the Deep State, and the Dems are on the same team. What Zelensky is doing right now is waging direct war on the United States and attempting to interfere in our elections, on behalf of the Democrats, and Trump is having none of it.
Shit just got real.
Manybikes retweeted
SNAP, EBT, food stamps shouldn’t be federal taxpayer funded in the first place…is not within the purview of any of the 17 federal powers enumerated in our Constitution. Charity should be voluntary and not forced via taxation. It’s an individual states issue at best.
Manybikes retweeted
Want cheaper college?
Stop subsidizing it.
Want cheaper healthcare?
Stop subsidizing it.
Want cheaper homes?
Stop subsidizing mortgages.
Want cheaper groceries?
Stop subsidizing sugar and corn.
Want fewer homes wrecked by floods?
Stop subsidizing building in flood zones.
Manybikes retweeted
Why do we have to pass a law for that? It is already illegal for illegals to be receiving Medicaid. WTF?
Manybikes retweeted
The things I do for you: I translated Governor Maura Healey’s speech into English.
Manybikes retweeted
We have Lawfare.
We have Barfare (using bar discipline proceedings to try to destroy and cow Republican lawyers from litigating).
Elias wages both.
But given all of his attempts to interfere with sensible election measures to stop illegals from voting, to get real signature verification, and to enforce state election rules instead of allowing any mailed-in ballot imaginable to be counted, regardless of its provenance or verifiability, I must coin a new term:
MARXFARE™️
And Elias is MARXFARE™️’s field general.
MARXFARE™️ is using the law to try to create a one-party monopoly and thus eventually a one-party dictatorship, just like Communist China has.
See the diagram. Not all Lawfare is Marxfare™️, though there is a lot of overlap (some Lawfare is just harassment of Republicans, raising their relative costs to operate — not good but likely not Republic-ending). But all Barfare is both Lawfare and Marxfare™️.
And Marxfare™️ and Barfare are Republic-ending cancers.
Manybikes retweeted
Why we KNOW fossil fuels played a completely negligible role in the rise of atmospheric CO₂
in plain English
1. Carbon has a fingerprint.
Carbon atoms come in two stable kinds. One is a little heavier than the other. Every source of carbon on Earth has its own mix of heavy and light atoms, and scientists measure that mix as a single number. Think of it as a fingerprint. Coal, oil, and gas have a fingerprint of minus 28. Carbon dioxide bubbling out of the ocean has a fingerprint of minus 8. Volcanoes are minus 5. Dissolving limestone is 0. A lower number means lighter carbon. These fingerprints are measured facts, and the IPCC uses the same numbers.
2. You can read the fingerprint of whatever is being added to the air.
When carbon is added to the atmosphere, the atmosphere's fingerprint drifts toward the fingerprint of what was added. In 1958 Charles Keeling showed a simple way to read off the fingerprint of the added carbon directly from the air measurements. It is a graph. Plot the air's fingerprint against the amount of CO₂ in the air in a certain way and you get a straight line. Where that line meets the edge of the graph is the fingerprint of the net addition. This is not a computer model. It is bookkeeping. You count the heavy atoms, you count the light atoms, and the answer follows. Nothing about oceans, forests, or weather goes into it.
3. The fingerprint of the added carbon is minus 13.
Koutsoyiannis (2024) did this with the four Scripps monitoring stations in Alaska, California, Hawaii, and the South Pole, using records from about 1978 to today. Every station gives the same answer: minus 13.2, give or take 0.2. These are the same records the IPCC relies on. Two completely separate measurements say the same thing. A Caribbean sponge that grows in yearly layers, like tree rings, records ocean carbon back to about the year 1500. Its fingerprint is about minus 13 for all five centuries, with no drift. Air trapped in Antarctic ice at Law Dome, analyzed by Köhler et al. (2006), also gives minus 13. Three different materials, three different laboratories, five hundred years, one number.
4. Simple mixing math sets the range from the modern data alone.
Every carbon atom added to the air came either from fossil-fuel combustion or from some non-fossil-fuel source: the ocean, volcanoes, rock weathering, plants and soil. The fingerprint of the mix tells you how much came from each. It works like mixing paint. If you mix black and white and get a very light gray, you know there was very little black. Fossil-fuel carbon is the black, at minus 28. The ocean is the white, at minus 8. The measured mix is minus 13, much closer to the ocean than to fossil fuel.
The modern record from 1978 to today does not by itself pin down the exact fingerprint of the non-fossil-fuel carbon. It could be anywhere from minus 8 (pure ocean) down to minus 13 (matching the mix exactly). Run the mixing math across that whole range and the fossil-fuel share comes out somewhere between zero and 26 percent. That is what we know from the modern data alone: not more than 26 percent, possibly zero. The exact answer comes in step 6.
5. The official claim is impossible under any assumption.
The IPCC, NASA, NOAA, EPA, and Engelbeen, Hannon, and Burton (2024) say fossil-fuel combustion caused essentially all of the rise. That is close to 100 percent. "Dominant" by any normal meaning is at least 80 percent. Run the mixing math backwards and ask what the non-fossil-fuel carbon would have to look like for each of those claims to be true:
- For fossil fuel to be even a bare 50 percent, the non-fossil-fuel carbon would need a fingerprint of plus 1.6. No carbon source on Earth is that heavy.
- For 80 percent, it would need a fingerprint of plus 46. That is more than 20 times heavier than the heaviest source that exists.
- For 90 percent, it would need plus 120, about 60 times heavier than anything on Earth.
- For 100 percent, it would need to be infinitely heavy.
The official claims do not fall a little short. They require carbon sources that do not exist.
6. Five hundred years of no change gives the exact answer: essentially ZERO (0% fossil-fuel sources).
The modern data left one unknown: the fingerprint of the non-fossil-fuel carbon. The sponge and ice-core records supply it. In the year 1500 there was essentially no fossil-fuel burning, so the fingerprint of the added carbon then, minus 13, came entirely from non-fossil-fuel sources. That fixes the unknown at minus 13. Since 1500, fossil-fuel burning has grown about ten thousand times over. If fossil-fuel carbon were any real part of the added carbon, the fingerprint would have slid toward minus 28 as burning grew. It did not move. It is still minus 13 today. Put minus 13 for the non-fossil-fuel carbon and minus 13.2 for the modern mix into the mixing math and fossil fuel's share of the added carbon comes out at about 1 percent, which is zero within the measurement error. The range of zero to 26 percent from step 4 collapses to a single answer: essentially zero.
7. Why this is knowledge, not opinion.
The conclusion rests on three things only:
- counting atoms,
- the standard measured fingerprints of fossil-fuel carbon and the other sources, and
- the Scripps, sponge, and ice-core records.
The IPCC uses all three. Anyone who accepts all three and rejects the conclusion is refusing to do arithmetic. The only way out is to throw away one of the three, and each one is a foundation of the IPCC's own work, and nobody has done so anywhere in the peer-reviewed literature.
8. What is actually happening.
Burning fossil fuel does put CO₂ into the air. That is measured at the smokestack. But a CO₂ molecule stays in the air only about four years on average before the ocean or plants take it back. So fossil-fuel CO₂ never piles up. Add up all fossil-fuel emissions since 1850 with that four-year turnover and only about 4 percent of the carbon in today's air came from fossil fuel. The growth in atmospheric CO₂ since the industrial revolution came from non-fossil-fuel sources.
Fossil fuel's share of that growth is essentially zero.
IPCC HUMAN CO₂ ATTRIBUTION PROVEN MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE
Fossil carbon contributes ≈ZERO to the observed rise in atmospheric CO₂.
The Keeling intercept has remained locked at δ¹³C_I ≈ −13‰ for five full centuries, while fossil emissions rose from essentially nothing to ~10 GtC yr⁻¹.
A large fossil fraction would have dragged the intercept toward −28‰. It didn't budge.
The only value consistent with a fixed intercept is
fossil fraction f ≈ 0.
IPCC’s own methods, own isotopic standards, and own data force the conclusion:
Human fossil emissions are not the cause of the rise in atmospheric CO₂. PERIOD.
The claim is mathematically dead.
Full mathematical proof:
bit.ly/NoHumanCO2
Manybikes retweeted
The climate change narrative has provided the perfect moral smokescreen for an immense global power shift.
We are watching the rise of globalism in real time—or rather, we are failing to see it, because no major media outlet bothers reporting it. While the world is distracted by headline conflicts in the Strait of Hormuz and the relentless war in Ukraine, global leadership is quietly changing hands.
This crossroads has been ignored and watered down for decades. Few report how Western nations have systematically degraded their own economies, shuttered manufacturing base load, and divided their communities while this geopolitical trade-off takes place.
Powerful, unseen interests are carving up the future of Western industrial assets, energy independence and national wealth. It is a tragic moment that threatens to reduce the West to secondary status permanently.
This quandary is fed almost entirely by Western weakness, short-term greed, and a total collapse of strategic foresight. Political leadership abandoned its industrial duty of care long ago, raising the inescapable question: how did they get away with it?
Western leadership hasn’t saved the planet—it has simply outsourced its wealth, power grid and supply chain security to a manufacturing hegemony led by China.
This opaque transition moves power toward transnational bodies like the UN and WEF, while shifting global economic weight directly to the BRICS bloc. Combined with unmanaged demographic shifts and deindustrialisation, Western societies are left fragmented, energy-starved, and structurally vulnerable.
When energy, manufacturing, and population baseline shift simultaneously, it represents the ultimate breakdown of governance and democratic accountability.
Manybikes retweeted
Great job @nickshirleyy , now come to Massachusetts and destroy @MassGovernor Maura Healey’s chances of reelection… Corruption is rampant here in Massachusetts…
Gavin Newsom Presidential Chances
DESTROYED as Nick Shirley EXPOSES Mass CRIMINAL California Fraud...
$10 million in daycare fraud in San Diego just led to twelve people being arrested by the Feds.
$12 million in homeless aid fraud resulted in three arrests.
And now Nick Shirley is exposing the failed high speed rail project that has already wasted $15 billion but has gone nowhere.
Newsom’s chances in 2028 are now tanking…
Manybikes retweeted
SNAP and Section 8 cost U.S. taxpayers $138 billion last year, and that is before Medicaid, SSI, and the rest. Food is expensive in part because 42 million people are buying groceries with a card someone else funded.
The damage is not only the bill. When tens of millions of people organize their month around a government check, they stop voting on the country and start voting on the benefit. Borders, crime, and debt become background noise next to the one question that matters to them: who will keep the groceries and the rent voucher flowing.
Milton Friedman put it plainly: you cannot simultaneously have free immigration and a welfare state.
Manybikes retweeted
It should no longer be permissible to say, when referring to a Cornography Caucus senator, “yeah, but he/she is from the state of [insert name of state dominated by Big Corn], so he/she has to take that position.”
I’m calling BS.
We all have industries that could benefit from forced consumption.
That doesn’t mean we should yield to those destructive impulses.
Sure, the Cornography Caucus raises a crap ton of money (that’s slightly more than a metric ton) from Big Corn.
That’s no excuse for doing something so fundamentally anti-free-market and anti-American as forcing every American to buy something they don’t want to buy!
