Married Vet, Math background. I provide 1-1 coaching/based therapy yielding you joy & confidence. Eyes On The Prize | Prov. 28:1 Make Therapy Great Again
Joined June 2024
- Tweets26.8K
- Following568
- Followers6.2K
- Likes173K
Based Therapist | Marchese Methods retweeted
PSA to people who HAVE to bitch on longposts when they could just keep scrolling. There's an ancient technique to keep that ADHD physical anxiety at bay
I'll demonstrate.
“It’s basic English to type like a normal person”
Not only is this a nothing statement, but also redundant, and also libspeak. Are your politics Basic Human Decency and Just Being A Good Freaking Person
“For some reason this is the type of language that X promotes”
This is the language of perpetual external locus of control. X actually reflects what you tell it you want, so if you’re seeing that don’t complain because that’s what you can’t help but engage with
“Negro talk” obscures that language develops and moves and flows and evolves, particularly online, and has new more accurate use and phrases. As if I even used anything so “terminally online” or “incel talk” both of which, ironically, are Les “terminally online” phrases. Most people don’t even really know what an “incel” is. “Unironically” try using that with a person who’s not online.
We’re not doing the performative and obligatory “say nice thing” part of “some of your analyses have been spot on”, especially since that’s such a feminine backhanded compliment. Every single one of my analyses is objectively correct actually, and you’ll never manage to construct an argument against them, because you’re wrong and driven by emotional antecedents, where every “point” and “belief” you have is just some self-serving nonsense that makes you feel like a tough guy.
You’re never going to “critique” my points, you’re never going to do anything. You’ll keep making the college excuse but simultaneously LARP that you’re Very Serious, and after college it’ll be whatever else.
What an oxymoron too, if you don’t have time to make a serious argument then shut the fuck up with the unsusbtantive drive-by desperate attempts to patronize me to make up for feeling stupid when happening across my posts
I have quite a few new groyper moots, so bringing this up to the front for your enjoyment. A comprehensive analysis that applies to Captive Coper, Fugitive Coper, and Goyle
Based Therapist | Marchese Methods retweeted
One of the mythologies to break about what BASTE therapy entails is that it's still "just freekarino whining and complaining and venting and emotional masturbation" (not that bro thinks this).
The based label should be enough to imply that's not present, but many people still get "scared" of that for lack of a better term.
That's not necessarily in the antitherapycel way, and all of my clients deeply understand instantly what working with me actually is like. They rightfully under their current understanding suspect that it's just exposing oneself emotionally and getting some kind of validation and enablement.
Yet, if you're conscious of that then you can rest assured you won't let enablement get the best of you and sink you into being a Cope Theorist Id Slave. You won't let yourself do that. In fact, relying on a comfort heuristic of never addressing emotions to maintain the "comfort" of sitting in masculine toughness is ironically operating on an emotion, fear, and betrays a masculine ethos of Eyes On The Prize.
That said, cathartic venting is important in the therapeutic process. Much of pathology is a burial of feelings rather than feeling them pursuant to processing. It's cognitive/emotional reps. Retards, shitlibs, and women take this and run with it to the cope hills to say things like "real men show their emotions", which is just a cope excuse to solicit sympathy, be needy, and never strengthen one's emotions and tolerances.
That said, a skilled and baste therapist (literally me) not only gives room for catharsis, but gives room for it expressed without therapy-speak f_(a)_qqy little lines like "how does that make you feel". Any time I do have to ask for feelings words, I'll more so say something like "walk me through how you experienced that". However, this doesn't mean I get neurotic, it's fine to use the feelings question appropriately, especially when the person is having a hard time identifying their feelings. Sometimes I'll say the feeling for them, and it's usually words like "frustrated" rather than "you sound hurt". Essentially, I carefully give room for it without people having to feel like we're in foidtherapy.
Most of the time it looks like us broing out and loling about how gay and retarded either everything is or whatever person/issue they're dealing with is.
MarcheseMethods(.)com for 1-1 BASTE therapy and coaching
Based Therapist | Marchese Methods retweeted
I’m gonna go lookup ID and superego again. This may be your best post among many.
Based Therapist | Marchese Methods retweeted
Have you submitted "girlfriendguys" into the DSM yet? Because you should.
Based Therapist | Marchese Methods retweeted
"I have sex with more than one woman therefore I'm tough and masculine"
A man like this is entirely dependent on women for their identity, self-respect and self-worth.
If a pretty smile and a "yes" can make him feel like the king of the world, the lack of one can do the opposite.
They can try to mitigate the risk of their addiction/dependency by dispersing it among many women, but how they see themselves will always remain firmly in the hands of women, or a woman.
They are needy slaves, addicts.
A man's mental point of origin must be God, or if he's an atheist, himself, to be a man and not a slave.
The general and everyone there has no idea what the fuck “Zionist state” even means. This is just a self-serving tough guy who wanted to let everyone know how COURAGEOUS AND BASTE he is.
He knew what the answer was. “Zionist” is libspeak btw
Based Therapist | Marchese Methods retweeted
She even changed her username xD
An absolute roast of the tallest order from @MarcheseMethods
She knows us moids are helpless to women's desire because she has a lot of sex, and moids are helpless to women's desire because they're beneath women in inter psychic power and needy unlike celestial powerful women btw.
She has a lot of sex so she knows a thing or two about sex. She has a lot of sex because she's really hot btw guys, and hot girls are like, cool and valuable. Men she knows you're not predators, so give her your emotional vulnerability, especially because she'll have sex with you, because she likes to have a lot of sex, a Very Serious High Order Intellectual thing to like. Not many people like to have sex, and if they do it's about being an animal, unlike her, who likes sex because it's some magical celestial experience for her. She'll provide that for you too btw, so you can rest assured you can give your sexuality to her safely.
If you think you can argue anything she says, you can't, because she has had so much sex with so many men that she knows what she's talking about. How could she not? Experience means she knows what sex feels like, and knowing what something feels like is a Very Accurate way to arrive at truth. All that knowing what sex feels like gave her insight into the Very Complicated Celestial Intricacies of sex, a Very Complicated subject of much intellectual intrigue, with serious mathematical depth, logical depth, and structure that we need a ton of rational analysis of, which is comprised of examining how we feel when we have sex, a very rational thing. Sex is not something we share in common with the lowest level and most simple life forms, not some preprogrammed simple reward mechanism for successful reproduction. It's the most complicated thing in existence, because like, there's a bunch of different feelings it can provoke in us, and feelings are very high order and complicated too.
Good thing we have such an intellectual on the frontlines having a lot of sex for all of us so we can know what sex feels like, using her gift that is she's hawt enough to be able to have a lot of sex with a lot of men. She will continue to have a lot of sex, which she can because she's still that hawt btw, purely for our sake and not because she has a pathological Id Slavery issue and uses sex as a way to confer value upon herself amidst feeling valueless for never Superego aligning.
A woman who has a lot of sex is speaking (she can because she's hawt btw), listen and learn.
Based Therapist | Marchese Methods retweeted
This was the funniest thing I've read in a long time, it made my day lol.
After the slightest confrontation, the girlfriendguys have realized how hollow, cucked, vaginal, enslaved, and emasculated their gay little "Enjoy The Decline", "No Fault Divorce is BASTE aykshually" and "Feminism is here to stay" is. What happened to What's Your Plannn brooo and Dude Just Adapt Broooo
But suddenly posting like this is an act and dance. It's not real, they don't authentically hold this. Instead, they're doing this because they will neurotically do anything it takes to appear to have a seat at the Tough And Cool Kids Table to pacify their neurotic castration anxiety. They don't have a rational construction for their little world, consequently it can't withstand argumentation, so they'll just morph to LARP as serious about fixing things to patch up that inconsistency.
Girlfriendguys don't get to participate in this actually. You don't get tough guy credit, you don't get to parasocially identify with anyone standing up to leftists, shitlibs, femtards, bullies. Perhaps the most sleezy thing of all. Give it another year or so of the culture decidedly pushing back feminism and suddenly these dorks will say they have a plan, and condescendingly lecture everyone about doing something. Somehow they'll have the credit, just like how they're mysterious Red Pill Clergy but nobody has ever heard of them until well after the days of The Red Pill, and with no way for their claims to their precious Red Pill religion to be verified.
These dorks are duplicitous, traitors, the enemy within your ranks. Their pathological low self esteem and hedonism knows no bounds, their only loyalty and only actions on the world are not even for their own benefit, but rather for their own pleasure and ego indulgence in le "I have sex with more than one woman therefore I'm tough and masculine 😏😏😏😏😏"
Another note on le "Youwr nawt a wreel fewrapithst" in response to me Being Mean ™, is that tacitly admits they interface with me and the world as vulnerable.
They feel perpetually vulnerable, weak, disempowered, and are constantly expressing it, feeling exposed even if they're playing some kind of game.
Hence, if I respond by Being Mean, they resort to crying & saying I'm a bully, feeling justified in being a helpless victim, and me being a jerk who took advantage of that.
Essentially these types of people are imagining interacting with me as therapist-client even without them booking a session with me, because their interaction with me is an ask for help, which is really an ask for enablement, something I'm supposed to do because the Therapy Religion mandates Being Nice, which they take to mean "makes me feel pleasure and goodies at all times". Since it's a religion I'm supposed to Be Nice at all times, since it's a matter of morality not business. It's my duty to them to give this in charity, and particularly that morality of Be Nice is really Be Nice to that specific person, because they can only conceptualize morality as not just hunter gatherer utility but rather hunter gatherer utility for them, which of course they measure by "good feelings = moral good / bad feelings = moral bad"
F_(a)_qqots think that they are like the state and therapists are the clergy, such that therapists have religious authority but they have final authority, which means they can revoke your authority whenever they feel like it.
In this case, they think their religion requires the therapist “priestly” class to Be Nice all the time, to everyone, under every circumstance.
Pretty amusing that he was skimming replies and found this one, implying seethe and looking for something he vaguely felt he could le OWN me over. If you were to ask him “according to what” he would stutter and stammer.
Not only is this gay in terms of I only really owe my clients my compassion, not f_(a)_qqots, if anything what many people need help with is seeing that it’s okay for them to stand up to bullies and retards. I got the idea to become a therapist from doing this then young men asking me how I did it, especially when these interactions include subtle condescension that gives them plausible deniability to gaslight you into thinking they weren’t taking down to you. You get to Be Mean to people who are rude to you actually, and it doesn’t require an explanation, and it doesn’t require some homo eroticism over “communication skills”. The likes of these people, like toddlers, will only ever respond to negative and positive feelings enforcement. So to make them stop being rude you hit them back psychically tenfold.
Furthermore, in their eternal low IQ, they can’t conceptualize doing anything without emotional antecedent neuroticism and identification. If I’m “Mean” to anyone, that implies I carry that capacity, which means I’m a “risk” to my clients. They can’t fathom meanness not consumed by hatred, so they presume if you’re mean you’re like them and just hateful and will psychologically assault everyone.
Related 1
xitter.cf/MarcheseMethods/status…
Always amusing when I construct a linear, rational, intricate psychoanalysis and there’s a stupid woman in my replies who doesn’t like it. Biggest reasons are:
1. She feels stupid for not getting it and not being able to articulate the same way
2. She doesn’t like the truth of it
Typical reply; “erm you’re PSYCHOTIC seek help”, because to a lizard brain baby it’s “crazy” to defy your lazy little instincts to conserve calories in typing more than 280 characters.
But another one is “gwiftew” or “youw not a wreel fewrapithst”, because women think they actually define therapy and psychology. Which, according to them, is essentially “person who makes people feel good and comfy”.
Even if that were the case, I don’t owe that to anyone except my clients. So it’s really “enabler of women”, because women are deities to themselves.
They really think they can declare “you’re not a therapist” because they *feel like you’re not*, which especially amuses me because their typical regard for therapists is their le edukayshun and Evidence Based Practice ™. Me and you can’t say therapists are wrong because they’re educated, but if we’re educated and say things they don’t like then they can declare by feelings and vibes your education is null and void. Suddenly they’re above education.
There are so many more based therapists than you would think btw. It is one of the original fields to attract high IQ autists, and started with rationalism. Anyone who takes an interest in the truth and arriving at actualization will conclude on what’s considered “far right”. While the field attracts dumb women because they think it’s about playing nice and cuddles, there are a number of us who see the full picture and thereby become therapists to help you organize your mind to a place of peace.
Related 2
xitter.cf/MarcheseMethods/status…
> Erm. Concerning that you're a therapist (because you're supposed to enable my cope and make me feelsie goodsie and that's not what you're doing).
> I don't speak English because I'm insentient, so I totally can't even pick up on the logic and point you make. Instead I can vaguely map a handful of the words you said to emotions, which I mapped to negative ones.
> Negative emotions bad, so what you said is bad. Negative emotions means not true, so what you said is not true.
> To resolve I will impotently repeat my instructions for what to feel. I am saying good feeling things, listen to how good they sound, that means they're true. See how what I said makes you feel good? If I say them harder they're more true, and you should feel gooder. That way you'll get that my concept is good and true, because you'll feel its goodness.
> I have hunter gatherer felt heuristic logic. It vaguely feels correct to say there are these silly "preferences", because uh, like people different. That seems right, and my brain feels like it's right. It feels like it's right because I am a woman who defines the word attraction or attractive as "he's categorically fuckable", which requires more than looks. I don't understand what you're saying about physical appearance being one vector and appraising that vector independent of others. Also attraction means "perfect scenario male with every possible need met, for relationship and sex". Attractive actually just kind of means anything that makes me feel good.
> I'm defensive and scared about what you're saying, because I don't like the possibility of male sexuality having that much power over me because sexuality is my only power and that strips it from me. So I have to make like there are significant standards for it to feel powerful. I also feel social shame because attraction from just a body is considered shallow, simple, fiendish. It also hurtsies my feelsies because it would mean my entire schema of the world is wrong, which makes me feel stupid.
This is what I mean when I say people don't speak English, they just mumble feelings noises back and forth. They cannot understand words, and cannot understand the rational arguments and constructions they come together for.
Based Therapist | Marchese Methods retweeted
Marchese Maxxing is the panacea
MarcheseMethods dot com for 1-1 coaching/based therapy where I help you navigate and change your complex thoughts, feeling, and behaviors to yield you purpose, confidence, results and peace
Also, me and French OG collaborated a while back. Link below
Libtards live in eternal Id Slavery and Superego neglect, consequently they hate themselves.
Hence, any increment of intimacy is threatening because you’ll *know* who they are, for which they presume you’ll hate them too. Even if slightly, any exposure is an existential threat, because they have absolutely no grounding healthy at least partially constructed sense of self and identity.
Moreover, they’re scared of affection because they feel guilty for receiving it because it’s *unearned* by them being indulgent Id Slaves.
The Marchese Conjecture is a RETVRN to DISCIPLINE. Superego alignment is the way forward, the way to transcendence, actualization, fulfillment. No more neurotransmitter slavery, no more hedonism, especially for you Rightdorks that halfass hedge by being mediocrities and very bare minimum superego aligned pursuant to excused cooming.
She knows us moids are helpless to women's desire because she has a lot of sex, and moids are helpless to women's desire because they're beneath women in inter psychic power and needy unlike celestial powerful women btw.
She has a lot of sex so she knows a thing or two about sex. She has a lot of sex because she's really hot btw guys, and hot girls are like, cool and valuable. Men she knows you're not predators, so give her your emotional vulnerability, especially because she'll have sex with you, because she likes to have a lot of sex, a Very Serious High Order Intellectual thing to like. Not many people like to have sex, and if they do it's about being an animal, unlike her, who likes sex because it's some magical celestial experience for her. She'll provide that for you too btw, so you can rest assured you can give your sexuality to her safely.
If you think you can argue anything she says, you can't, because she has had so much sex with so many men that she knows what she's talking about. How could she not? Experience means she knows what sex feels like, and knowing what something feels like is a Very Accurate way to arrive at truth. All that knowing what sex feels like gave her insight into the Very Complicated Celestial Intricacies of sex, a Very Complicated subject of much intellectual intrigue, with serious mathematical depth, logical depth, and structure that we need a ton of rational analysis of, which is comprised of examining how we feel when we have sex, a very rational thing. Sex is not something we share in common with the lowest level and most simple life forms, not some preprogrammed simple reward mechanism for successful reproduction. It's the most complicated thing in existence, because like, there's a bunch of different feelings it can provoke in us, and feelings are very high order and complicated too.
Good thing we have such an intellectual on the frontlines having a lot of sex for all of us so we can know what sex feels like, using her gift that is she's hawt enough to be able to have a lot of sex with a lot of men. She will continue to have a lot of sex, which she can because she's still that hawt btw, purely for our sake and not because she has a pathological Id Slavery issue and uses sex as a way to confer value upon herself amidst feeling valueless for never Superego aligning.
A woman who has a lot of sex is speaking (she can because she's hawt btw), listen and learn.
She has a lot of sex with a lot of people, because like, she can, because she’s HAWT. We’re all VERY impressed with this feat of excellence, which has given her access to ✨experience✨ (feeling what sex is like), which is a goldmine of intellectual and psychological rigor. A woman who has sex is speaking, listen & learn.
Since she’s HAWT that means she doesn’t have to feel guilty for being an Id Slave, because like, sexual utility is THE continuum of morality and value, so if you have a lot of sex you’re AYKSHUALLY Superego aligned.
Also she’s too tough and independent for all that stupid shame about it. She doesn’t GIVE A FUCK DOOD. That makes her tough and powerful, which must mean she’s not too weak to tame the Id, which thereby means she’s Superego aligned. I’m “powerful” and the Superego is power itself, therefore I’m the Superego, therefore I’m aligned.
Analysis of this dork below. Most interestingly, this teenage boy in high school sexual conquest LARP is a symptom of Penis Envy, where they feel male sexual conquest as generally powerful. They feel helpless to it, and are envious of male power in us being the Superego incarnate, but falsely conflate this abstract power with sexual conquest, because it’s tangible and more observable.
They feel helpless and powerless to male sexual conquest because the men who can control sex, something they’re not used to. More deeply, they’re more helpless to their pleasure principle and tendency to indulgence, such that they get confused that despite their sexuality as *less easily activated* in terms of direct attraction, once it is activated, they can’t control themselves. Men may have “more of a sex drive”, but women have more of a pleasure and needy little baby for intimacy drive.
Hence they figure if they can just copy that they’ll have the same power level. Full analysis in the article
This didn't happen. She overheard this conversation nearby at a bar, gave a dirty look at the guy saying this, then he looked back at her, which she then took and ran with to the cope hills to then say "he just hit on me 😏😏😏😏😏😏"
This game is one in which she's flustered that a guy like that violates the female social edict orders of "not manipulating them", which they're perpetually neurotic about because they know themselves to be manipulable. The resentment is in that it "takes" women out of their safe and secure relationships, of course overlooking that they're accountable and take themselves out of their relationships actually.
The resentment further builds because they "know" that kind of guy won't do what he *makes them feel like* they'll do. It's *annoying* how enticing they are by way of their unapologetic confident nature, their ruthless pursuit of whatever they want, activating hunter gatherer "he has the capacity to bring me lots of gibs". Except, emotionally, he won't bring her gibs. She knows that he knows he can manipulate her, and it's further irritating that it's kind of attractive that he doesn't care to not manipulate her, because it tacitly communicates he thinks of her as "beneath" him, unworthy of respect. Despite it being unhealthy, it's *close enough* to emulating generalized masculine-feminine relational transactions, where she's in a position of being led or subordinate to him.
It's like how when you're with a woman and your relationship is falling apart, you've fought all day, but then she says something really sweet. It's annoying because she JUST communicated all kinds of rejection to you, played ego tough guy, but is now opening up to you. It feels inauthentic and dismissive of what was bothering you.
To reconcile, and *take back* her emotions and "value", she plays the game on "He (hawt guy) hit on me but I said no! Especially since he's just sOoOo gross!". This is reaction formation with the calculus that she gets to still *extract* that a hawt guy wanted her, implying she's hawt, also implying that she's hawtter than him, a foid double dip.
Moreover, the foidnip foid triple dip here emerges where she gets to feel tough and strong for rejecting him. This of course abuses that she already has the emotional fortress of investment in her husband, both as her feelings for him making it not so easy to jump ship and as "I already get most of what I want with him". She cope rationalizes this implies she has the power to reject a hawt jerk chad, of course obscuring the part where she can't do that without an emotional fortress. Even if, without the emotional fortress, she doesn't go on to bang him or whatever, it still feels like she banged him mentally if she found herself helpless to wanting to fuck him, especially since she knows what comes after that, which is disappointment and the usual gas station behavior.
